ANOVA Assumptions

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
R. W. Emerson
{"title":"ANOVA Assumptions","authors":"R. W. Emerson","doi":"10.1177/0145482X221124187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue of the Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (JVIB), the article “Evaluating the use of tactile shapes in associative learning for people who are blind,” by Gupta, Mannheimer, Rao, and Balakrishnan reports the results of one-way ANOVA tests, but also notes results of something called “Levene’s test.” The mention of this test gives me a chance to talk about the assumptions behind a test like the one-way ANOVA. If readers will recall, a one-way ANOVA is a statistical test in which a dependent variable is compared across three or more groups. An example might be looking at the average height of people in North America, Africa, Europe, and Asia. An experimenter would collect a bunch of height data across those continents and could compare the average heights using an ANOVA test. But an experimenter should only use the ANOVA test if certain conditions are satisfied within the data. The first assumption is that the dependent measure is continuous, which means that it can have a value across a wide range and can have any value within that range. Height satisfies this requirement because people are a range of heights and can be any height within that range. The second assumption is that of normality, which is the assumption that the data for each group is drawn from a normally distributed population. A researcher could plot the heights of all the people in the dataset from each of the continents sampled and each sample should look like the standard bellshaped curve, with most heights being close to the average of the sample, and fewer people being much taller or much shorter. Plotting data is a quick way to check for normality. There are also statistical measures of normality. The shape of the bell curve has characteristics called “skewness” and “kurtosis.” One can think of skewness as how symmetrical the bell curve is and kurtosis as how pointy the curve is. If the bell curve of the plotted data is too lopsided (skewness of more than 1 or less than −1) or if it is too pointy (kurtosis of more than 3), then the sample of data is probably not normally distributed and another statistical test needs to be used. There are other tests that look at normality, but I will not get too deep in the weeds on that topic right now. The third assumption of data for an ANOVA test is that of independence, which means that the data in one group are not influenced by the data in another group and that the data in each group was gathered using random sampling. If height data from people in Turkey were included in both the European group and the Asian group, then those two groups would not be independent. Similarly, if a researcher only sampled people from Vancouver to represent all of North America, that would not be properly represented as a random sample of the continent. The final assumption of data for an ANOVA test is that of equal variances, and this is the point at which a test like Levene’s test comes into play. The assumption of equal variances means that the amount of spreading of scores in each group’s data is similar. Variance is calculated by adding the squared difference of each score from that score’s group average, then dividing that total by the number of scores in the group. It is related to SD because SD is the square Statistical Sidebar","PeriodicalId":47438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","volume":"116 1","pages":"585 - 586"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X221124187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this issue of the Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (JVIB), the article “Evaluating the use of tactile shapes in associative learning for people who are blind,” by Gupta, Mannheimer, Rao, and Balakrishnan reports the results of one-way ANOVA tests, but also notes results of something called “Levene’s test.” The mention of this test gives me a chance to talk about the assumptions behind a test like the one-way ANOVA. If readers will recall, a one-way ANOVA is a statistical test in which a dependent variable is compared across three or more groups. An example might be looking at the average height of people in North America, Africa, Europe, and Asia. An experimenter would collect a bunch of height data across those continents and could compare the average heights using an ANOVA test. But an experimenter should only use the ANOVA test if certain conditions are satisfied within the data. The first assumption is that the dependent measure is continuous, which means that it can have a value across a wide range and can have any value within that range. Height satisfies this requirement because people are a range of heights and can be any height within that range. The second assumption is that of normality, which is the assumption that the data for each group is drawn from a normally distributed population. A researcher could plot the heights of all the people in the dataset from each of the continents sampled and each sample should look like the standard bellshaped curve, with most heights being close to the average of the sample, and fewer people being much taller or much shorter. Plotting data is a quick way to check for normality. There are also statistical measures of normality. The shape of the bell curve has characteristics called “skewness” and “kurtosis.” One can think of skewness as how symmetrical the bell curve is and kurtosis as how pointy the curve is. If the bell curve of the plotted data is too lopsided (skewness of more than 1 or less than −1) or if it is too pointy (kurtosis of more than 3), then the sample of data is probably not normally distributed and another statistical test needs to be used. There are other tests that look at normality, but I will not get too deep in the weeds on that topic right now. The third assumption of data for an ANOVA test is that of independence, which means that the data in one group are not influenced by the data in another group and that the data in each group was gathered using random sampling. If height data from people in Turkey were included in both the European group and the Asian group, then those two groups would not be independent. Similarly, if a researcher only sampled people from Vancouver to represent all of North America, that would not be properly represented as a random sample of the continent. The final assumption of data for an ANOVA test is that of equal variances, and this is the point at which a test like Levene’s test comes into play. The assumption of equal variances means that the amount of spreading of scores in each group’s data is similar. Variance is calculated by adding the squared difference of each score from that score’s group average, then dividing that total by the number of scores in the group. It is related to SD because SD is the square Statistical Sidebar
方差分析假设
在本期《视觉障碍与失明杂志》(JVIB)上,Gupta、Mannheimer、Rao和Balakrishnan的文章《评估盲人在联想学习中触觉形状的使用》报告了单向方差分析测试的结果,但也注意到了一种名为“Levene测试”的结果。“提到这个测试让我有机会谈论像单向方差分析这样的测试背后的假设。如果读者还记得的话,单因素方差分析是一种统计测试,其中一个因变量在三个或更多组之间进行比较。一个例子可能是北美、非洲、欧洲和亚洲的平均身高。实验者会收集这些大陆的一组身高数据,并使用方差分析测试来比较平均身高。但实验者只有在数据中满足某些条件的情况下才应该使用方差分析测试。第一个假设是依赖度量是连续的,这意味着它可以在一个宽范围内具有一个值,也可以在该范围内具有任何值。身高满足这一要求,因为人的身高是一个范围,可以是该范围内的任何身高。第二个假设是正态性,即假设每组的数据来自正态分布的总体。研究人员可以绘制数据集中每个大洲所有人的身高图,每个样本都应该看起来像标准的钟形曲线,大多数人的身高都接近样本的平均值,而身高或身高要高得多或更短的人更少。绘制数据是检查正常性的一种快速方法。还有正常性的统计衡量标准。钟形曲线的形状具有被称为“偏斜度”和“峰度”的特征。人们可以将偏斜度视为钟形曲线的对称程度,将峰度视为曲线的尖度。如果绘制数据的钟形曲线过于偏斜度(偏斜度大于1或小于−1)或过于尖斜度(峰度大于3),那么数据样本可能不是正态分布的,需要使用另一个统计检验。还有其他测试着眼于正常性,但我现在不会对这个话题太深入。方差分析检验数据的第三个假设是独立性,这意味着一组中的数据不受另一组中数据的影响,并且每组中的数据都是使用随机抽样收集的。如果土耳其人的身高数据同时包括在欧洲组和亚洲组中,那么这两个组就不会是独立的。同样,如果研究人员只对温哥华的人进行抽样,以代表整个北美,那么这就不能被恰当地代表为整个大陆的随机样本。方差分析检验的最后一个数据假设是方差相等,这就是像Levene检验这样的检验发挥作用的点。方差相等的假设意味着每组数据中得分的分布量相似。方差的计算方法是将每个分数与该分数的组平均值的平方差相加,然后将总数除以组中的分数。它与SD有关,因为SD是方形统计边栏
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness is the essential professional resource for information about visual impairment (that is, blindness or low vision). The international peer-reviewed journal of record in the field, it delivers current research and best practice information, commentary from authoritative experts on critical topics, News From the Field, and a calendar of important events. Practitioners and researchers, policymakers and administrators, counselors and advocates rely on JVIB for its delivery of cutting-edge research and the most up-to-date practices in the field of visual impairment and blindness. Available in print and online 24/7, JVIB offers immediate access to information from the leading researchers, teachers of students with visual impairments (often referred to as TVIs), orientation and mobility (O&M) practitioners, vision rehabilitation therapists (often referred to as VRTs), early interventionists, and low vision therapists (often referred to as LVTs) in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信