EXTRACTIVISMO, DERECHO Y CONFLICTO SOCIAL EN COLOMBIA

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Henry Bocanegra Acosta, Jorge Enrique Carvajal Martínez
{"title":"EXTRACTIVISMO, DERECHO Y CONFLICTO SOCIAL EN COLOMBIA","authors":"Henry Bocanegra Acosta, Jorge Enrique Carvajal Martínez","doi":"10.21017/REV.REPUB.2019.V26.A63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research article is the result of research on the project entitled, Public Policy, Law and Social Movements. The objective of this research is to present how popular consultations have been developed in Colombia regarding extraction processes. This is to demonstrate how this participation mechanism has become a tool for environmental advocacy and the fight of communities against the extractive model. The research question is how popular consultations are being used by Colombian society so as to question the extractive model? There search method tackles a socio-legal field as it confronts a social fact against a normative element of citizen participation, its approach is qualitative and the research tools stem from the documentary analysis. The article concludes that popular consultations in the context of the mining energy conflict have been important insofar as the communities affected by the extractivist model might exercise their right to decide whether or not to implement the energy mining model. The above-mentioned tools were innovative and effective; however, Colombian high courts have curtailed the effectiveness of these constitutional actions. \nDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2019.v26.a63","PeriodicalId":40477,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA REPUBLICANA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA REPUBLICANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21017/REV.REPUB.2019.V26.A63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research article is the result of research on the project entitled, Public Policy, Law and Social Movements. The objective of this research is to present how popular consultations have been developed in Colombia regarding extraction processes. This is to demonstrate how this participation mechanism has become a tool for environmental advocacy and the fight of communities against the extractive model. The research question is how popular consultations are being used by Colombian society so as to question the extractive model? There search method tackles a socio-legal field as it confronts a social fact against a normative element of citizen participation, its approach is qualitative and the research tools stem from the documentary analysis. The article concludes that popular consultations in the context of the mining energy conflict have been important insofar as the communities affected by the extractivist model might exercise their right to decide whether or not to implement the energy mining model. The above-mentioned tools were innovative and effective; however, Colombian high courts have curtailed the effectiveness of these constitutional actions. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2019.v26.a63
哥伦比亚的采掘主义、法律和社会冲突
这篇研究文章是对题为“公共政策、法律和社会运动”项目的研究成果。这项研究的目的是介绍哥伦比亚如何就提取过程开展民众协商。这是为了展示这种参与机制如何成为环境宣传和社区反对采掘模式的工具。研究问题是,哥伦比亚社会如何利用大众咨询来质疑采掘模式?该搜索方法处理了一个社会法律领域,因为它面对的是一个社会事实,而不是公民参与的规范元素,它的方法是定性的,研究工具来源于文献分析。文章的结论是,在采矿-能源冲突的背景下,公众协商非常重要,因为受采掘模式影响的社区可以行使决定是否实施能源采矿模式的权利。上述工具是创新和有效的;然而,哥伦比亚高等法院削弱了这些宪法行动的效力。DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2019.v26.a63
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: La Revista Republicana es una publicación semestral del Centro de Investigaciones de la Corporación Universitaria Republicana, institución universitaria ubicada en Bogotá D.C, Colombia. Tiene el propósito de visibilizar la producción académica de investigadores nacionales e internacionales concretada en artículos científicos que deben ser inéditos, resultado de proyectos de investigación preferiblemente terminados; en temas relacionados con el derecho y las ciencias sociales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信