Interspecific differences in microhabitat use expose insects to contrasting thermal mortality

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Maria Vives-Ingla, Javier Sala-Garcia, Constantí Stefanescu, Armand Casadó-Tortosa, Meritxell Garcia, Josep Peñuelas, Jofre Carnicer
{"title":"Interspecific differences in microhabitat use expose insects to contrasting thermal mortality","authors":"Maria Vives-Ingla,&nbsp;Javier Sala-Garcia,&nbsp;Constantí Stefanescu,&nbsp;Armand Casadó-Tortosa,&nbsp;Meritxell Garcia,&nbsp;Josep Peñuelas,&nbsp;Jofre Carnicer","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecotones linking open and forested habitats contain multiple microhabitats with varying vegetal structures and microclimatic regimes. Ecotones host many insect species whose development is intimately linked to the microclimatic conditions where they grow (e.g., the leaves of their host plants and the surrounding air). Yet microclimatic heterogeneity at these fine scales and its effects on insects remain poorly quantified for most species. Here we studied how interspecific differences in the use of microhabitats across ecotones lead to contrasting thermal exposure and survival costs between two closely-related butterflies (<i>Pieris napi</i> and <i>P. rapae</i>). We first assessed whether butterflies selected different microhabitats to oviposit and quantified the thermal conditions at the microhabitat and foliar scales. We also assessed concurrent changes in the quality and availability of host plants. Finally, we quantified larval time of death under different experimental temperatures (thermal death time [TDT] curves) to predict their thermal mortality considering both the intensity and the duration of the microclimatic heat challenges in the field. We identified six processes determining larval thermal exposure at fine scales associated with butterfly oviposition behavior, canopy shading, and heat and water fluxes at the soil and foliar levels. Leaves in open microhabitats could reach temperatures 3–10°C warmer than the surrounding air while more closed microhabitats presented more buffered and homogeneous temperatures. Interspecific differences in microhabitat use matched the TDT curves and the thermal mortality in the field. Open microhabitats posed acute heat challenges that were better withstood by the thermotolerant butterfly, <i>P. rapae</i>, where the species mainly laid their eggs. Despite being more thermosensitive, <i>P. napi</i> was predicted to present higher survivals than <i>P. rapae</i> due to the thermal buffering provided by their selected microhabitats. However, its offspring could be more vulnerable to host-plant scarcity during summer drought periods. Overall, the different interaction of the butterflies with microclimatic and host-plant variation emerging at fine scales and their different thermal sensitivity posed them contrasting heat and resource challenges. Our results contribute to setting a new framework that predicts insect vulnerability to climate change based on their thermal sensitivity and the intensity, duration, and accumulation of their heat exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"93 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.1561","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ecotones linking open and forested habitats contain multiple microhabitats with varying vegetal structures and microclimatic regimes. Ecotones host many insect species whose development is intimately linked to the microclimatic conditions where they grow (e.g., the leaves of their host plants and the surrounding air). Yet microclimatic heterogeneity at these fine scales and its effects on insects remain poorly quantified for most species. Here we studied how interspecific differences in the use of microhabitats across ecotones lead to contrasting thermal exposure and survival costs between two closely-related butterflies (Pieris napi and P. rapae). We first assessed whether butterflies selected different microhabitats to oviposit and quantified the thermal conditions at the microhabitat and foliar scales. We also assessed concurrent changes in the quality and availability of host plants. Finally, we quantified larval time of death under different experimental temperatures (thermal death time [TDT] curves) to predict their thermal mortality considering both the intensity and the duration of the microclimatic heat challenges in the field. We identified six processes determining larval thermal exposure at fine scales associated with butterfly oviposition behavior, canopy shading, and heat and water fluxes at the soil and foliar levels. Leaves in open microhabitats could reach temperatures 3–10°C warmer than the surrounding air while more closed microhabitats presented more buffered and homogeneous temperatures. Interspecific differences in microhabitat use matched the TDT curves and the thermal mortality in the field. Open microhabitats posed acute heat challenges that were better withstood by the thermotolerant butterfly, P. rapae, where the species mainly laid their eggs. Despite being more thermosensitive, P. napi was predicted to present higher survivals than P. rapae due to the thermal buffering provided by their selected microhabitats. However, its offspring could be more vulnerable to host-plant scarcity during summer drought periods. Overall, the different interaction of the butterflies with microclimatic and host-plant variation emerging at fine scales and their different thermal sensitivity posed them contrasting heat and resource challenges. Our results contribute to setting a new framework that predicts insect vulnerability to climate change based on their thermal sensitivity and the intensity, duration, and accumulation of their heat exposure.

Abstract Image

微生境使用的种间差异使昆虫面临截然不同的热死亡率
连接开放生境和森林生境的过渡带包含多种具有不同植被结构和小气候制度的微生境。过渡带是许多昆虫的宿主,它们的发育与它们生长的小气候条件密切相关(例如,寄主植物的叶子和周围的空气)。然而,在这些细微尺度上的小气候异质性及其对昆虫的影响,对大多数物种的量化仍然很差。在这里,我们研究了跨过渡带的微生境利用的种间差异如何导致两种密切相关的蝴蝶(Pieris napi和P. rapae)之间热暴露和生存成本的对比。我们首先评估了蝴蝶是否选择了不同的微栖息地进行产卵,并量化了微栖息地和叶面尺度的热条件。我们还评估了寄主植物的质量和可用性的同步变化。最后,我们量化了不同实验温度下幼虫的死亡时间(热死亡时间[TDT]曲线),以预测其热死亡率,同时考虑了田间小气候热挑战的强度和持续时间。我们确定了六个决定幼虫热暴露的过程,这些过程与蝴蝶产卵行为、树冠遮荫以及土壤和叶面上的热量和水通量有关。开放微生境的叶片温度比周围空气温度高3 ~ 10℃,而封闭微生境的叶片温度更为缓冲均匀。微生境利用的种间差异与田间热死亡率和TDT曲线吻合。开放的微生境带来了严重的热挑战,而耐热蝴蝶P. rapae则能更好地抵御这种挑战,该物种主要在这里产卵。尽管napi对温度更敏感,但由于其所选择的微生境提供了热缓冲,预计其存活率高于油菜。然而,在夏季干旱期间,其后代可能更容易受到寄主植物稀缺的影响。综上所述,蝴蝶与小气候和寄主植物变化的不同相互作用以及它们不同的热敏性使它们面临着不同的热量和资源挑战。我们的研究结果有助于建立一个基于昆虫热敏感性和热暴露强度、持续时间和积累的气候变化脆弱性预测的新框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信