Reliability and Validity Evidence of Two Distance Education Learning Environments Scales

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
T. Brown, Luke S Robinson, K. Gledhill, Mong-lin Yu, Stephen T. Isbel, C. Greber
{"title":"Reliability and Validity Evidence of Two Distance Education Learning Environments Scales","authors":"T. Brown, Luke S Robinson, K. Gledhill, Mong-lin Yu, Stephen T. Isbel, C. Greber","doi":"10.1080/08923647.2022.2065147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students more than ever are completing their university studies online. At the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, most higher education providers were required to move to exclusively deliver online curriculum. It is therefore imperative that educators have access to psychometrically sound measures of students’ online learning experiences. The reliability and validity properties of the Distance Education Learning Environments Scale (DELES) and Student Engagement in the e-Learning Environment Scale (SELES) were examined. A sample of 151 Australian undergraduate students completed the DELES and SELES after completing their studies online during 2020 due to Covid-19. Cronbach alpha coefficients, subscale item correlations and linear regression analyses were completed with bootstrapping. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the SELES subscales ranged from .68 to .93 and .75 to .96 for the DELES subscales. The within subscale correlations ranged from .29 to .66 for the SELES (p < .001) and .30 to .68 for the DELES (p < .001) and the between subscale correlations ranged from .18 to .75 (p < .001) respectively. Regression findings indicated that the SELES and DELES subscale models each accounted for 56.6% and 22.2% of the unique variance of the DELES Enjoyment, respectively. These findings present important psychometric evidence about the DELES and SELES.","PeriodicalId":46327,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Distance Education","volume":"37 1","pages":"199 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Distance Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2065147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Students more than ever are completing their university studies online. At the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, most higher education providers were required to move to exclusively deliver online curriculum. It is therefore imperative that educators have access to psychometrically sound measures of students’ online learning experiences. The reliability and validity properties of the Distance Education Learning Environments Scale (DELES) and Student Engagement in the e-Learning Environment Scale (SELES) were examined. A sample of 151 Australian undergraduate students completed the DELES and SELES after completing their studies online during 2020 due to Covid-19. Cronbach alpha coefficients, subscale item correlations and linear regression analyses were completed with bootstrapping. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the SELES subscales ranged from .68 to .93 and .75 to .96 for the DELES subscales. The within subscale correlations ranged from .29 to .66 for the SELES (p < .001) and .30 to .68 for the DELES (p < .001) and the between subscale correlations ranged from .18 to .75 (p < .001) respectively. Regression findings indicated that the SELES and DELES subscale models each accounted for 56.6% and 22.2% of the unique variance of the DELES Enjoyment, respectively. These findings present important psychometric evidence about the DELES and SELES.
两种远程教育学习环境量表的信度和有效性证据
摘要学生们比以往任何时候都更多地在网上完成他们的大学学业。在新冠肺炎大流行开始时,大多数高等教育提供者被要求完全提供在线课程。因此,教育工作者必须能够获得对学生在线学习体验的心理测量。考察了远程教育学习环境量表(DELES)和电子学习环境学生参与度量表(SELES)的信度和有效性。由于新冠肺炎,151名澳大利亚本科生在2020年完成在线学习后完成了DELES和SELES。Cronbachα系数、分量表项目相关性和线性回归分析通过自举完成。SELES分量表的Cronbachα系数为.68至.93,DELES分量表为.75至.96。SELES的分量表内相关性范围为.29至.66(p<0.001),DELES的分量范围为.30至.68(p<001),分量表间相关性范围分别为.18至.75(p<.001)。回归结果表明,SELES和DELES分量表模型分别占DELES享受独特方差的56.6%和22.2%。这些发现为DELES和SELES提供了重要的心理测量证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Distance Education
American Journal of Distance Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信