Differentiating passive from active risk taking: the role of self-control and time perspective

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Tali Idan-Tzach, Ruty Keinan, Yoella Bereby-Meyer
{"title":"Differentiating passive from active risk taking: the role of self-control and time perspective","authors":"Tali Idan-Tzach,&nbsp;Ruty Keinan,&nbsp;Yoella Bereby-Meyer","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Passive risks are risks brought on, or magnified, by inaction (e.g., not getting vaccinated). They differ from active risks, which are incurred by actions people take, that put them at risk (such as smoking). Although (active) risk taking has been extensively studied, much less is known about passive risk taking and the personal tendencies associated with such behavior. We propose two individual traits—self-control (SC) and time perspective—that affect the inclination to take passive and active risks, albeit in distinct ways, contributing to the differentiation between the two types of risks. In four studies, we examine a model that suggests that a future time perspective mediates the association between SC and passive risk taking, while a present-hedonistic time perspective mediates the association between SC and active risk taking. The findings, based on both self-report questionnaires and actual behavior, support the model and its theoretical basis. Implications and future direction are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.2344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Passive risks are risks brought on, or magnified, by inaction (e.g., not getting vaccinated). They differ from active risks, which are incurred by actions people take, that put them at risk (such as smoking). Although (active) risk taking has been extensively studied, much less is known about passive risk taking and the personal tendencies associated with such behavior. We propose two individual traits—self-control (SC) and time perspective—that affect the inclination to take passive and active risks, albeit in distinct ways, contributing to the differentiation between the two types of risks. In four studies, we examine a model that suggests that a future time perspective mediates the association between SC and passive risk taking, while a present-hedonistic time perspective mediates the association between SC and active risk taking. The findings, based on both self-report questionnaires and actual behavior, support the model and its theoretical basis. Implications and future direction are discussed.

Abstract Image

区分被动和主动承担风险:自我控制和时间观的作用
被动风险是由不作为(例如,不接种疫苗)带来或放大的风险。它们不同于主动风险,主动风险是由人们采取的行动引起的,这些行动使他们处于危险之中(如吸烟)。虽然(主动的)冒险行为已经被广泛研究,但对于被动的冒险行为以及与这种行为相关的个人倾向,我们所知甚少。我们提出了两种个体特征——自我控制(SC)和时间视角——影响被动和主动风险倾向,尽管方式不同,但有助于区分两种类型的风险。在四项研究中,我们检验了一个模型,该模型表明未来时间观介导了SC与被动风险承担之间的关联,而现在享乐主义时间观介导了SC与主动风险承担之间的关联。基于自我报告问卷和实际行为的研究结果支持了该模型及其理论基础。讨论了影响和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad base of content and style. It publishes original empirical reports, critical review papers, theoretical analyses and methodological contributions. The Journal also features book, software and decision aiding technique reviews, abstracts of important articles published elsewhere and teaching suggestions. The objective of the Journal is to present and stimulate behavioral research on decision making and to provide a forum for the evaluation of complementary, contrasting and conflicting perspectives. These perspectives include psychology, management science, sociology, political science and economics. Studies of behavioral decision making in naturalistic and applied settings are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信