Information Science Students’ Emotional Response to Copyright

Q2 Social Sciences
Sara Rachel Benson, Melissa G. Ocepek
{"title":"Information Science Students’ Emotional Response to Copyright","authors":"Sara Rachel Benson, Melissa G. Ocepek","doi":"10.3138/jelis-2020-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright intersects with every field of Library and Information Science (LIS) from archival and preservation practices to reference services and academic librarianship. However, copyright instruction is still lacking in many Information Science programs across the country ( Cross & Edwards, 2011 ; Schmidt & English, 2015 ). The sudden move to remote online education in the spring of 2020 due to a global pandemic highlighted the importance of understanding copyright exceptions and, especially, the power of fair use to quickly provide resources to a wide variety of patrons with novel needs. The need for accessible copyright education for all information professionals has never been stronger. However, engaging with copyright often provokes cognitive as well as affective uncertainty, likely due to the fear and anxiety that can come from the threat of serious financial and reputational consequences. Logically, it seems that librarians might feel less anxious about copyright if they had participated in formalized training about copyright focused on legal issues impacting library and information professionals. To understand this likely correlation, the researchers queried students using a qualitative survey both before and after taking an eight-week intensive copyright course that paired legal expertise with an everyday approach to material designed to demystify the law. Using phenomenographic methodology, the investigators asked their information science students how they attempt to answer copyright questions and how they feel about doing so. The results provide evidence supporting the need for more robust copyright education in schools of information science, as such training to help future librarians to feel more prepared to answer copyright questions and less anxious about intersections between copyright and their field of librarianship before they enter the workforce.","PeriodicalId":37587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2020-0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Copyright intersects with every field of Library and Information Science (LIS) from archival and preservation practices to reference services and academic librarianship. However, copyright instruction is still lacking in many Information Science programs across the country ( Cross & Edwards, 2011 ; Schmidt & English, 2015 ). The sudden move to remote online education in the spring of 2020 due to a global pandemic highlighted the importance of understanding copyright exceptions and, especially, the power of fair use to quickly provide resources to a wide variety of patrons with novel needs. The need for accessible copyright education for all information professionals has never been stronger. However, engaging with copyright often provokes cognitive as well as affective uncertainty, likely due to the fear and anxiety that can come from the threat of serious financial and reputational consequences. Logically, it seems that librarians might feel less anxious about copyright if they had participated in formalized training about copyright focused on legal issues impacting library and information professionals. To understand this likely correlation, the researchers queried students using a qualitative survey both before and after taking an eight-week intensive copyright course that paired legal expertise with an everyday approach to material designed to demystify the law. Using phenomenographic methodology, the investigators asked their information science students how they attempt to answer copyright questions and how they feel about doing so. The results provide evidence supporting the need for more robust copyright education in schools of information science, as such training to help future librarians to feel more prepared to answer copyright questions and less anxious about intersections between copyright and their field of librarianship before they enter the workforce.
信息科学专业学生对版权的情感反应
版权涉及图书馆和信息科学(LIS)的各个领域,从档案和保存实践到参考服务和学术图书馆。然而,全国各地的许多信息科学项目仍然缺乏版权指导(Cross&Edwards,2011;Schmidt和English,2015)。由于全球疫情,2020年春季突然转向远程在线教育,突显了理解版权例外的重要性,尤其是公平使用的力量,可以快速为各种有新需求的顾客提供资源。对所有信息专业人员进行无障碍版权教育的需求从未像现在这样强烈。然而,从事版权工作往往会引发认知和情感上的不确定性,这可能是由于严重的财务和声誉后果带来的恐惧和焦虑。从逻辑上讲,如果图书馆员参加了针对影响图书馆和信息专业人员的法律问题的正式版权培训,他们似乎不会对版权感到焦虑。为了了解这种可能的相关性,研究人员在参加为期八周的版权强化课程前后对学生进行了定性调查,该课程将法律专业知识与旨在揭开法律神秘面纱的日常材料方法相结合。研究人员使用现象学方法,询问了信息科学专业的学生如何试图回答版权问题,以及他们对此的感受。研究结果提供了证据,支持信息科学学校需要更强有力的版权教育,这样的培训可以帮助未来的图书馆员在进入工作岗位之前,更好地准备好回答版权问题,减少对版权和图书馆工作领域之间交叉点的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (JELIS) is a fully refereed scholarly periodical that has been published quarterly by the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) since 1960. JELIS supports scholarly inquiry in library and information science (LIS) education by serving as the primary venue for the publication of research articles, reviews, and brief communications about issues of interest to LIS educators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信