Revolutionary Warfare? Assessing the Character of Competing Factions within the Boko Haram Insurgency

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Ed Stoddard
{"title":"Revolutionary Warfare? Assessing the Character of Competing Factions within the Boko Haram Insurgency","authors":"Ed Stoddard","doi":"10.1080/19392206.2019.1668632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The respective politico-military characters of the competing factions within the Boko Haram insurgency have not received as much academic attention as other features of the Boko Haram phenomenon. This article uses the concept of “revolutionary warfare” to examine and compare the two main factions. Traditionally applied to Marxist movements, this conceptualization is increasingly associated with violent Jihadist groups who combine a revolutionary ideology with a strategy based on winning popular support and a growing ability to militarily beat conventional forces. It argues that the “Islamic State West Africa Province” faction has adopted a revolutionary warfare approach based on increasingly sophisticated semi-conventional warfare and a simultaneous drive to win popular support. The Jama’at Ahl as-Sunnah lid-Da’wah wa’l-Jihad faction, while equally revolutionary in its goals, appears, for doctrinal reasons and due to pressure from the military, to be operating in contrast to key revolutionary warfare precepts.","PeriodicalId":44631,"journal":{"name":"African Security","volume":"12 1","pages":"300 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19392206.2019.1668632","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2019.1668632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT The respective politico-military characters of the competing factions within the Boko Haram insurgency have not received as much academic attention as other features of the Boko Haram phenomenon. This article uses the concept of “revolutionary warfare” to examine and compare the two main factions. Traditionally applied to Marxist movements, this conceptualization is increasingly associated with violent Jihadist groups who combine a revolutionary ideology with a strategy based on winning popular support and a growing ability to militarily beat conventional forces. It argues that the “Islamic State West Africa Province” faction has adopted a revolutionary warfare approach based on increasingly sophisticated semi-conventional warfare and a simultaneous drive to win popular support. The Jama’at Ahl as-Sunnah lid-Da’wah wa’l-Jihad faction, while equally revolutionary in its goals, appears, for doctrinal reasons and due to pressure from the military, to be operating in contrast to key revolutionary warfare precepts.
革命战争?博科圣地叛乱内部敌对势力的性质评估
摘要博科圣地叛乱中相互竞争的派系各自的政治军事特征并没有像博科圣地现象的其他特征那样受到学术界的关注。本文用“革命战争”的概念来考察和比较这两个主要派别。传统上应用于马克思主义运动,这种概念越来越多地与暴力圣战主义团体联系在一起,他们将革命意识形态与基于赢得民众支持和日益增强的军事打击常规部队能力的战略相结合。它认为,“伊斯兰国西非省”派系采取了一种基于日益复杂的半常规战争和同时争取民众支持的革命性战争方法。Jama'at Ahl as Sunnah lid-Da'wah wa'l-Jihad派系虽然在目标上同样具有革命性,但由于理论原因和军方的压力,其行动似乎与关键的革命战争准则形成了鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Security
African Security POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信