S. Qi, Jinjin Wu, Yiwen Xu, Yiming Zhang, Raorao Wang, Kai Li, Yuanzhi Xu
{"title":"Chemical Stability and Antimicrobial Activity of Plasma-Sprayed Cerium Oxide-Incorporated Calcium Silicate Coating in Dental Implants.","authors":"S. Qi, Jinjin Wu, Yiwen Xu, Yiming Zhang, Raorao Wang, Kai Li, Yuanzhi Xu","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe aim of this study is to investigate the biological activity and antibacterial property of cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coatings (CeO2-CS) in dental implants.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nIn this study, MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on the plastic, Ti-6Al-4V, and the cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coatings (CeO2-CS) coating served as the blank, control, and CeO2-CS groups, respectively. A cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the biocompatibility. The osteoblastic differentiation of the MC3T3-E1 cells was also analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. The CCK-8 and counts of colony-forming units (CFUs) were used to detect the antibacterial activity of the coating on Enterococcus faecalis. The study showed that the cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coating (CeO2-CS) has better biocompatibility. Meanwhile, the ALP, OCN, and BSP mRNA expression levels in the CeO2-CS group were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05). The number of viable bacteria and the CFU results were significantly reduced in the CeO2-CS group (P < 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coatings (CeO2-CS) may promote the osteoblastic differentiation of osteoblasts. Meanwhile, the cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coating (CeO2-CS) showed strong antimicrobial activity on E. faecalis, with good biocompatibility.","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000937","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to investigate the biological activity and antibacterial property of cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coatings (CeO2-CS) in dental implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study, MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on the plastic, Ti-6Al-4V, and the cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coatings (CeO2-CS) coating served as the blank, control, and CeO2-CS groups, respectively. A cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the biocompatibility. The osteoblastic differentiation of the MC3T3-E1 cells was also analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. The CCK-8 and counts of colony-forming units (CFUs) were used to detect the antibacterial activity of the coating on Enterococcus faecalis. The study showed that the cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coating (CeO2-CS) has better biocompatibility. Meanwhile, the ALP, OCN, and BSP mRNA expression levels in the CeO2-CS group were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05). The number of viable bacteria and the CFU results were significantly reduced in the CeO2-CS group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coatings (CeO2-CS) may promote the osteoblastic differentiation of osteoblasts. Meanwhile, the cerium oxide-incorporated calcium silicate coating (CeO2-CS) showed strong antimicrobial activity on E. faecalis, with good biocompatibility.
期刊介绍:
Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.