Is “just googling it” good enough for first-year students?

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

College & Undergraduate Libraries Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10691316.2021.1894295

Maureen Richards

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This study analyzes citations by first-year students to determine what content they were citing and whether it was available through the open web or the library. Examining the role of these two places as content providers for academic work fills a gap in the literature. Most of the cited works were available through the library and the open web. As the line between content providers continues to blur, these results can help academic libraries prioritize what to teach students about information literacy, where to focus collection development efforts, and how to promote the discovery of library resources.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对于一年级的学生来说，“只是在谷歌上搜索”就足够了吗？

摘要本研究分析了一年级学生的引文，以确定他们引用的内容以及这些内容是否可以通过开放网络或图书馆获得。考察这两个地方作为学术工作内容提供者的作用，填补了文献中的空白。大多数被引用的作品都可以通过图书馆和开放网络获得。随着内容提供商之间的界限不断模糊，这些结果可以帮助学术图书馆优先考虑向学生教授什么信息素养，将收藏开发工作的重点放在哪里，以及如何促进图书馆资源的发现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

College & Undergraduate Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： College & Undergraduate Libraries enables libraries serving primarily undergraduate students to enhance the range of services, resources, and facilities offered to their constituents while also contributing to staff professional development. Whether focusing on public services, technical services, management, or technology, the journal highlights the fact that undergraduate libraries must collaborate with agencies both on and off campus in order to survive and thrive. In addition to numerous columns on current topics, typical contents include research-based articles, case studies, reports of best practices, an occasional literature review or product review, and opinion pieces.