Predictors and outcomes of nursing students' engagement trajectories at the beginning of their program

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Pierre Cheyroux , Alexandre J.S. Morin , Philippe Colombat , Nicolas Gillet
{"title":"Predictors and outcomes of nursing students' engagement trajectories at the beginning of their program","authors":"Pierre Cheyroux ,&nbsp;Alexandre J.S. Morin ,&nbsp;Philippe Colombat ,&nbsp;Nicolas Gillet","doi":"10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study seeks to achieve a dynamic understanding of nursing students' engagement trajectories, of the predictive role of their levels of harmonious passion, obsessive passion, exposure to challenge and hindrance demands, and perceptions of institutional support in relation to their engagement trajectories. We also consider the implications of these trajectories for a variety of outcomes related to students' attitudes (i.e., dropout intentions and program satisfaction), psychological health<span> (i.e., negative affect and life satisfaction), and behaviors (i.e., performance and absenteeism). A sample of 2515 first-year nursing students were surveyed five times, with intervals of one month, over a four-month period during the first semester of their program. Our results revealed four profiles of students presenting High and Stable, Moderate and Decreasing, Low and Decreasing, and Moderate and Stable engagement trajectories. Harmonious and obsessive passion, challenge and hindrance demands, and institutional support were associated with these trajectories in a way that mainly supported our expectations. Trajectories characterized by lower levels of engagement were associated with higher levels of negative affect and absenteeism, and with lower levels of performance, program satisfaction, and life satisfaction. Conversely, trajectories characterized by higher levels of engagement were associated with lower levels of dropout intentions and higher levels of performance.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879123000775","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to achieve a dynamic understanding of nursing students' engagement trajectories, of the predictive role of their levels of harmonious passion, obsessive passion, exposure to challenge and hindrance demands, and perceptions of institutional support in relation to their engagement trajectories. We also consider the implications of these trajectories for a variety of outcomes related to students' attitudes (i.e., dropout intentions and program satisfaction), psychological health (i.e., negative affect and life satisfaction), and behaviors (i.e., performance and absenteeism). A sample of 2515 first-year nursing students were surveyed five times, with intervals of one month, over a four-month period during the first semester of their program. Our results revealed four profiles of students presenting High and Stable, Moderate and Decreasing, Low and Decreasing, and Moderate and Stable engagement trajectories. Harmonious and obsessive passion, challenge and hindrance demands, and institutional support were associated with these trajectories in a way that mainly supported our expectations. Trajectories characterized by lower levels of engagement were associated with higher levels of negative affect and absenteeism, and with lower levels of performance, program satisfaction, and life satisfaction. Conversely, trajectories characterized by higher levels of engagement were associated with lower levels of dropout intentions and higher levels of performance.

护理专业学生课程开始时参与轨迹的预测因素和结果
本研究旨在动态了解护生的敬业度轨迹,以及他们的和谐激情、强迫性激情、挑战和障碍需求的暴露水平,以及与他们的敬业度轨迹相关的制度支持的感知的预测作用。我们还考虑了这些轨迹对与学生态度(即退学意图和课程满意度)、心理健康(即消极影响和生活满意度)和行为(即表现和缺勤)相关的各种结果的影响。2515名一年级护理专业学生在第一学期的四个月时间里接受了五次调查,每次间隔一个月。我们的研究结果揭示了四种学生的参与轨迹:高且稳定、中等且减少、低且减少、中等且稳定。和谐与执着的激情,挑战与阻碍的需求,以及制度的支持都以一种主要支持我们期望的方式与这些轨迹相关联。参与水平较低的轨迹特征与较高水平的负面影响和缺勤有关,与较低水平的绩效、项目满意度和生活满意度有关。相反,高参与度的轨迹与低退学意图和高绩效相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Journal of Vocational Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vocational Behavior publishes original empirical and theoretical articles offering unique insights into the realms of career choice, career development, and work adjustment across the lifespan. These contributions are not only valuable for academic exploration but also find applications in counseling and career development programs across diverse sectors such as colleges, universities, business, industry, government, and the military. The primary focus of the journal centers on individual decision-making regarding work and careers, prioritizing investigations into personal career choices rather than organizational or employer-level variables. Example topics encompass a broad range, from initial career choices (e.g., choice of major, initial work or organization selection, organizational attraction) to the development of a career, work transitions, work-family management, and attitudes within the workplace (such as work commitment, multiple role management, and turnover).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信