{"title":"Simulation of energy dissipation downstream of labyrinth weirs by applying support vector regression integrated with meta-heuristic algorithms","authors":"Amin Mahdavi-Meymand, Wojciech Sulisz","doi":"10.1016/j.jher.2021.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In this study, multi-tracker optimization algorithm (MTOA), particle swarm<span> optimization (PSO), and differential evolution (DE) algorithms were integrated with support vector regression (SVR) to predict energy dissipation downstream of labyrinth weirs (Δ</span></span><em>E</em><span>). In order to evaluate the performance of these methods, the results are compared with corresponding outcome obtained by applying two other methods, namely, multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) and multiple linear regressions methods (MLR). The input parameters comprise the discharge, the upstream flow depth, the crest length of a single cycle of the labyrinth weir, the width of a single cycle of the labyrinth weir, the apex width, the number of labyrinth weir cycles, the sidewall angle, and the height of weir. The results indicate that the meta-heuristic algorithms substantially improve the performance of SVR. The results show that the integrative methods, SVR-MTOA, SVR-PSO, and SVR-DE, are more accurate than the MLPNN and the MLR. In average, the integrative methods provide 39.63% more accurate results than the MLPNN and 79.34% more accurate results than the MLR. The average RMSE and </span><em>R<sup>2</sup></em> for the integrative methods are 0.0054 m and 0.977, respectively. Among all integrative methods, the SVR-MTOA yields the best results, with <em>RMSE</em> = 0.0044 m and <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> = 0.986.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49303,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydro-environment Research","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 91-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydro-environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570644321000915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In this study, multi-tracker optimization algorithm (MTOA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and differential evolution (DE) algorithms were integrated with support vector regression (SVR) to predict energy dissipation downstream of labyrinth weirs (ΔE). In order to evaluate the performance of these methods, the results are compared with corresponding outcome obtained by applying two other methods, namely, multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) and multiple linear regressions methods (MLR). The input parameters comprise the discharge, the upstream flow depth, the crest length of a single cycle of the labyrinth weir, the width of a single cycle of the labyrinth weir, the apex width, the number of labyrinth weir cycles, the sidewall angle, and the height of weir. The results indicate that the meta-heuristic algorithms substantially improve the performance of SVR. The results show that the integrative methods, SVR-MTOA, SVR-PSO, and SVR-DE, are more accurate than the MLPNN and the MLR. In average, the integrative methods provide 39.63% more accurate results than the MLPNN and 79.34% more accurate results than the MLR. The average RMSE and R2 for the integrative methods are 0.0054 m and 0.977, respectively. Among all integrative methods, the SVR-MTOA yields the best results, with RMSE = 0.0044 m and R2 = 0.986.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to provide an international platform for the dissemination of research and engineering applications related to water and hydraulic problems in the Asia-Pacific region. The journal provides a wide distribution at affordable subscription rate, as well as a rapid reviewing and publication time. The journal particularly encourages papers from young researchers.
Papers that require extensive language editing, qualify for editorial assistance with American Journal Experts, a Language Editing Company that Elsevier recommends. Authors submitting to this journal are entitled to a 10% discount.