Comparison of data-driven prediction methods for comprehensive coke ratio of blast furnace

IF 1.6 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xiuyun Zhai, Mingtong Chen
{"title":"Comparison of data-driven prediction methods for comprehensive coke ratio of blast furnace","authors":"Xiuyun Zhai, Mingtong Chen","doi":"10.1515/htmp-2022-0261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The emission of blast furnace (BF) exhaust gas has been criticized by society. It is momentous to quickly predict the comprehensive coke ratio (CCR) of BF, because CCR is one of the important indicators for evaluating gas emissions, energy consumption, and production stability, and also affects composite economic benefits. In this article, 13 data-driven prediction techniques, including six conventional and seven ensemble methods, are applied to predict CCR. The result of ten-fold cross-validation indicates that multiple linear regression (MLR) and support vector regression (SVR) based on radial basis function are superior to the other methods. The mean absolute error, the root mean square error, and the coefficient of determination (R 2) of the MLR model are 1.079 kg·t−1, 1.668, and 0.973, respectively. The three indicators of the SVR model are 1.158 kg·t−1, 1.878, and 0.975, respectively. Furthermore, AdaBoost based on linear regression has also strong prediction ability and generalization performance. The three methods have important significances both in theory and in practice for predicting CCR. Moreover, the models constructed here can provide valuable hints into realizing data-driven control of the BF process.","PeriodicalId":12966,"journal":{"name":"High Temperature Materials and Processes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Temperature Materials and Processes","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/htmp-2022-0261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The emission of blast furnace (BF) exhaust gas has been criticized by society. It is momentous to quickly predict the comprehensive coke ratio (CCR) of BF, because CCR is one of the important indicators for evaluating gas emissions, energy consumption, and production stability, and also affects composite economic benefits. In this article, 13 data-driven prediction techniques, including six conventional and seven ensemble methods, are applied to predict CCR. The result of ten-fold cross-validation indicates that multiple linear regression (MLR) and support vector regression (SVR) based on radial basis function are superior to the other methods. The mean absolute error, the root mean square error, and the coefficient of determination (R 2) of the MLR model are 1.079 kg·t−1, 1.668, and 0.973, respectively. The three indicators of the SVR model are 1.158 kg·t−1, 1.878, and 0.975, respectively. Furthermore, AdaBoost based on linear regression has also strong prediction ability and generalization performance. The three methods have important significances both in theory and in practice for predicting CCR. Moreover, the models constructed here can provide valuable hints into realizing data-driven control of the BF process.
高炉综合焦比数据驱动预测方法的比较
摘要高炉废气的排放一直受到社会的批评。快速预测高炉综合焦比具有重要意义,因为综合焦比是评价煤气排放、能耗和生产稳定性的重要指标之一,也影响着综合经济效益。本文将13种数据驱动的预测技术,包括6种常规方法和7种集成方法,应用于CCR的预测。十次交叉验证结果表明,基于径向基函数的多元线性回归(MLR)和支持向量回归(SVR)方法优于其他方法。MLR模型的平均绝对误差、均方根误差和决定系数(R2)为1.079 kg·t−1、1.668和0.973。SVR模型的三个指标为1.158 kg·t−1、1.878和0.975。此外,基于线性回归的AdaBoost还具有较强的预测能力和泛化性能。这三种方法对预测CCR具有重要的理论和实践意义。此外,本文构建的模型可以为实现BF过程的数据驱动控制提供有价值的提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
High Temperature Materials and Processes
High Temperature Materials and Processes 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: High Temperature Materials and Processes offers an international publication forum for new ideas, insights and results related to high-temperature materials and processes in science and technology. The journal publishes original research papers and short communications addressing topics at the forefront of high-temperature materials research including processing of various materials at high temperatures. Occasionally, reviews of a specific topic are included. The journal also publishes special issues featuring ongoing research programs as well as symposia of high-temperature materials and processes, and other related research activities. Emphasis is placed on the multi-disciplinary nature of high-temperature materials and processes for various materials in a variety of states. Such a nature of the journal will help readers who wish to become acquainted with related subjects by obtaining information of various aspects of high-temperature materials research. The increasing spread of information on these subjects will also help to shed light on relevant topics of high-temperature materials and processes outside of readers’ own core specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信