Quantifying transport safety success at the regional level: A guide to policy and practice on investment for G20

IF 6.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jingshun Zhang , Jiayi Hu , Xitong Wang , Lien Fang , Yi Jin , Muyang Li , Yangqing Liu , Anna Wu , Libin Wang , Ruining Liu , Yi Zhang , Faan Chen
{"title":"Quantifying transport safety success at the regional level: A guide to policy and practice on investment for G20","authors":"Jingshun Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiayi Hu ,&nbsp;Xitong Wang ,&nbsp;Lien Fang ,&nbsp;Yi Jin ,&nbsp;Muyang Li ,&nbsp;Yangqing Liu ,&nbsp;Anna Wu ,&nbsp;Libin Wang ,&nbsp;Ruining Liu ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Faan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.seps.2023.101715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dramatic numbers of road traffic casualties and resulting economic losses have posed significant obstacles to implementing sustainable development and are bound to disrupt economic stability and social well-being. Given these circumstances, it is vital for the government to evaluate the country's current road safety development in comparison with, and to learn from, the situations of better-performing countries. This study develops an efficient and comprehensive gauging system, which combines criteria importance through the intercriteria correlation (CRITIC), preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE II), and principal component analysis (PCA), namely CRITIC–PROMETHEE II–PCA, to provide the G20 countries with a tool for quantifying transport safety success. Comparisons of the results with those derived from other classical approaches confirm the robustness and feasibility of the proposed methodology across different socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds. This will allow policymakers to formulate corresponding reform measures and allocate investments rationally. This tool will notably enable the G20 to monitor road safety progress, set short- and long-term reform goals, introduce relevant regulations, and distribute investment and resources in a quick and timely manner. The proposed methodology could be used as a model for similar studies conducted in other parts of the world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22033,"journal":{"name":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101715"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123002276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dramatic numbers of road traffic casualties and resulting economic losses have posed significant obstacles to implementing sustainable development and are bound to disrupt economic stability and social well-being. Given these circumstances, it is vital for the government to evaluate the country's current road safety development in comparison with, and to learn from, the situations of better-performing countries. This study develops an efficient and comprehensive gauging system, which combines criteria importance through the intercriteria correlation (CRITIC), preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE II), and principal component analysis (PCA), namely CRITIC–PROMETHEE II–PCA, to provide the G20 countries with a tool for quantifying transport safety success. Comparisons of the results with those derived from other classical approaches confirm the robustness and feasibility of the proposed methodology across different socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds. This will allow policymakers to formulate corresponding reform measures and allocate investments rationally. This tool will notably enable the G20 to monitor road safety progress, set short- and long-term reform goals, introduce relevant regulations, and distribute investment and resources in a quick and timely manner. The proposed methodology could be used as a model for similar studies conducted in other parts of the world.

量化区域层面的运输安全成功:二十国集团投资政策和实践指南
大量的道路交通伤亡和由此造成的经济损失对实施可持续发展构成重大障碍,并势必破坏经济稳定和社会福利。鉴于这些情况,政府评估本国目前的道路安全发展,并与表现较好的国家进行比较,并向其学习,这一点至关重要。本研究开发了一个高效、全面的衡量系统,通过标准间相关性(CRITIC)、富集评价的偏好排序组织方法(PROMETHEE II)和主成分分析(PCA),即critical - PROMETHEE II - PCA,将标准重要性结合起来,为G20国家提供量化运输安全成功的工具。将结果与其他经典方法的结果进行比较,证实了所提出的方法在不同社会经济和人口背景下的稳健性和可行性。这将有利于政策制定者制定相应的改革措施,合理配置投资。该工具将使G20能够监测道路安全进展,制定短期和长期改革目标,制定相关法规,并快速及时地分配投资和资源。拟议的方法可以作为在世界其他地区进行的类似研究的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Socio-economic Planning Sciences
Socio-economic Planning Sciences OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
13.10%
发文量
294
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Studies directed toward the more effective utilization of existing resources, e.g. mathematical programming models of health care delivery systems with relevance to more effective program design; systems analysis of fire outbreaks and its relevance to the location of fire stations; statistical analysis of the efficiency of a developing country economy or industry. Studies relating to the interaction of various segments of society and technology, e.g. the effects of government health policies on the utilization and design of hospital facilities; the relationship between housing density and the demands on public transportation or other service facilities: patterns and implications of urban development and air or water pollution. Studies devoted to the anticipations of and response to future needs for social, health and other human services, e.g. the relationship between industrial growth and the development of educational resources in affected areas; investigation of future demands for material and child health resources in a developing country; design of effective recycling in an urban setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信