Ideološki sukobi i obrazovanje u Hrvatskoj

Q3 Social Sciences
Lucija Šikuten
{"title":"Ideološki sukobi i obrazovanje u Hrvatskoj","authors":"Lucija Šikuten","doi":"10.5613/rzs.50.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to explore ideological conflicts related to the attempted implementation of the Complete Curricular Reform in Croatia. This analysis is used as a basis for the evaluation of the process of conservative modernisation, as theorised by Michael Apple. The paper is based on the case study methodology and qualitative content analysis. The analysed contents were articles from the three most widely read news sites in Croatia, websites of prominent actors and the document of the National Curriculum Framework. The paper argues that the representatives of all groups pushing for a conservative modernisation were part of the public debate, but they were not all equally represented, nor did they demonstrate all the characteristics identified by Apple. The most prominent groups in the debate were the mutually related groups of neo-conservatives and (religious) authoritarian populists, who are committed to preserving the Croatian identity and the Christian tradition in education. Although the analysis identifies many elements of conservative modernisation, these are still not sufficient to fully confirm its presence in Croatia. Specifically, what is missing is a greater influence of the neoliberal policy in education that would be included in market competition. However, it seems that Croatia is moving in that direction.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":"50 1","pages":"61-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5613/rzs.50.1.3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija za Sociologiju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.50.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to explore ideological conflicts related to the attempted implementation of the Complete Curricular Reform in Croatia. This analysis is used as a basis for the evaluation of the process of conservative modernisation, as theorised by Michael Apple. The paper is based on the case study methodology and qualitative content analysis. The analysed contents were articles from the three most widely read news sites in Croatia, websites of prominent actors and the document of the National Curriculum Framework. The paper argues that the representatives of all groups pushing for a conservative modernisation were part of the public debate, but they were not all equally represented, nor did they demonstrate all the characteristics identified by Apple. The most prominent groups in the debate were the mutually related groups of neo-conservatives and (religious) authoritarian populists, who are committed to preserving the Croatian identity and the Christian tradition in education. Although the analysis identifies many elements of conservative modernisation, these are still not sufficient to fully confirm its presence in Croatia. Specifically, what is missing is a greater influence of the neoliberal policy in education that would be included in market competition. However, it seems that Croatia is moving in that direction.
克罗地亚的意识形态冲突与教育
本文旨在探讨与克罗地亚试图实施完全课程改革有关的意识形态冲突。这一分析被用作评估迈克尔·苹果所提出的保守现代化进程的基础。本文采用案例研究法和定性内容分析相结合的方法。分析的内容是克罗地亚三个阅读量最大的新闻网站的文章、知名人士的网站和国家课程框架文件。该论文认为,推动保守派现代化的所有团体的代表都是公众辩论的一部分,但他们并不是所有人都有平等的代表性,也没有表现出苹果所确定的所有特征。辩论中最突出的群体是相互关联的新保守派和(宗教)威权民粹主义者,他们致力于在教育中维护克罗地亚身份和基督教传统。尽管分析确定了保守现代化的许多因素,但这些因素仍然不足以完全证实其在克罗地亚的存在。具体而言,缺少的是新自由主义政策对教育的更大影响,这将被纳入市场竞争。然而,克罗地亚似乎正在朝着这个方向前进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revija za Sociologiju
Revija za Sociologiju Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信