Short versus Long-Leg Hip Spica After Closed Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Comparative Study

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohamad S Yasin, Mohammed S Alisi, Y. Hammad, Omar Q Samarah, Freih O Abu Hassan
{"title":"Short versus Long-Leg Hip Spica After Closed Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective Comparative Study","authors":"Mohamad S Yasin, Mohammed S Alisi, Y. Hammad, Omar Q Samarah, Freih O Abu Hassan","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S353279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Closed reduction (CR) is a standard treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after failed conservative treatment. After CR, the affected hip is held in the reduced position by a spica cast that typically extends below the knee (long). Above knee (short) spica cast is an alternative technique utilized by some pediatric orthopedic surgeons. We aimed to compare short versus long spica cast after CR in terms of success rate and complications. Methods Patients who underwent CR with short or long hip spica cast over a 3-year period (2016–2019) were evaluated for the success (sustainability of the reduction) and complications. The acute and long-term success were recorded retrospectively. Acute success was defined as concentric reduction of the hip confirmed by intraoperative arthrogram and immediate postoperative CT scan. Long-term success was defined as maintained reduction at 12 months’ post reduction. Results Forty-seven patients were included in our study. Long spica casts were used in 24 patients and short ones in the remaining 23. The overall acute and long-term success rates were 83% and 66%, respectively. The acute success rate of long spica was 87.5%, while short spica achieved 78.2%. On the long term, the success rate of short spica was higher than long one (73.9% vs 58.3%). Cox regression analysis showed that the type of cast (short vs long spica) was not correlated with acute success (P = 0.405), long-term success (P = 0.263), residual dysplasia (P = 0.405), or avascular necrosis (P = 0.053). Conclusion CR in DDH is an important line of management in the younger patient population and can save them an invasive open surgery later in life. A short leg spica could represent an easier and likely as successful alternative to the traditional long spica. More prospective future research is needed to validate our observational findings. Level of Evidence III.","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"71 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S353279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Closed reduction (CR) is a standard treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after failed conservative treatment. After CR, the affected hip is held in the reduced position by a spica cast that typically extends below the knee (long). Above knee (short) spica cast is an alternative technique utilized by some pediatric orthopedic surgeons. We aimed to compare short versus long spica cast after CR in terms of success rate and complications. Methods Patients who underwent CR with short or long hip spica cast over a 3-year period (2016–2019) were evaluated for the success (sustainability of the reduction) and complications. The acute and long-term success were recorded retrospectively. Acute success was defined as concentric reduction of the hip confirmed by intraoperative arthrogram and immediate postoperative CT scan. Long-term success was defined as maintained reduction at 12 months’ post reduction. Results Forty-seven patients were included in our study. Long spica casts were used in 24 patients and short ones in the remaining 23. The overall acute and long-term success rates were 83% and 66%, respectively. The acute success rate of long spica was 87.5%, while short spica achieved 78.2%. On the long term, the success rate of short spica was higher than long one (73.9% vs 58.3%). Cox regression analysis showed that the type of cast (short vs long spica) was not correlated with acute success (P = 0.405), long-term success (P = 0.263), residual dysplasia (P = 0.405), or avascular necrosis (P = 0.053). Conclusion CR in DDH is an important line of management in the younger patient population and can save them an invasive open surgery later in life. A short leg spica could represent an easier and likely as successful alternative to the traditional long spica. More prospective future research is needed to validate our observational findings. Level of Evidence III.
髋关节发育不良闭合复位后短腿和长腿髋关节Spica的回顾性比较研究
目的闭合复位(CR)是保守治疗失败后髋关节发育不良(DDH)的标准治疗方法。CR后,受影响的髋关节通过通常延伸到膝盖以下(长)的骨针石膏固定在复位位置。膝上(短)骨石膏是一些儿科整形外科医生使用的一种替代技术。我们旨在从成功率和并发症方面比较CR后的短和长spica石膏。方法对在3年内(2016年至2019年)接受短或长髋关节骨石膏CR的患者的成功率(复位的可持续性)和并发症进行评估。对急性和长期成功进行回顾性记录。急性成功被定义为通过术中关节造影和术后立即CT扫描确认的髋关节同心复位。长期成功被定义为在减少后12个月保持减少。结果本研究共纳入47例患者。24名患者使用了长管型,其余23名患者使用短管型。总的急性和长期成功率分别为83%和66%。长期来看,短突的成功率高于长突(73.9%vs 58.3%)。Cox回归分析表明,石膏类型(短突与长突)与急性成功率(P=0.405)、长期成功率(P=0.0263)、残余发育不良(P=0.40 5)无关,结论DDH的CR是年轻患者群体的一条重要的治疗途径,可以挽救他们以后的侵入性开放手术。短腿五香可能是传统长五香的一种更容易且可能成功的替代品。未来还需要更多前瞻性的研究来验证我们的观测结果。证据等级III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信