The Pragmatic Structure of the Responsive Message and the Typology of Feedback Forms in the Blog Text

Alexandra A. Aslanova
{"title":"The Pragmatic Structure of the Responsive Message and the Typology of Feedback Forms in the Blog Text","authors":"Alexandra A. Aslanova","doi":"10.29025/2079-6021-2022-3-169-182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a linguistic analysis of various types of feedback in accordance with their pragmatic role and functional load in the format of interlocutors’ blog interaction. In the context of blog communication, dialogical relationships between senders and recipients of stimulating messages, which are a prerequisite for the exchange of opinions, are based on the respondent’s planned feedback. The differences between explicit and implicit feedback with stimulating messages are revealed. A working hypothesis is put forward that in blog communication, in comparison with oral spontaneous communication, implicit feedback plays a more constructive role and has a specific functional load due to the respondent’s delayed (asynchronous) response to the stimulus, the reactive activation of the means of establishing and maintaining phatic contact with the interlocutor and the subjective detailing of the dictal and/or modus content of the stimulating message. Due to the time and/or spatial distance between the interlocutors, as well as the presence of multiple respondents, feedback is predetermined by the addressee’s expectations regarding the planned interaction, and not by the fact of mutual recognition of individual intentions that characterize oral spontaneous communication. The projected response and mental representations of an imaginary responsive respondent shed light on the pragmatic differences between stimulating and responsive messages, through which the participants of the communication plan to continue the exchange of information and emotions. The repertoire of communicative strategies that acquire essential importance in the process of overcoming the problems of establishing and maintaining feedback in computer-mediated communication is determined. The current aspects of designing the interfaces of blogging platforms that influence the pragmatic contexts of feedback implementation are discussed. It is established that in blog interaction, when initiating a stimulating judgment, the lack of feedback can be a natural phenomenon that does not affect the effectiveness of communication. This idea confirms the hypothesis put forward and outlines the prospects for research.","PeriodicalId":34231,"journal":{"name":"Aktual''nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktual''nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-3-169-182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article provides a linguistic analysis of various types of feedback in accordance with their pragmatic role and functional load in the format of interlocutors’ blog interaction. In the context of blog communication, dialogical relationships between senders and recipients of stimulating messages, which are a prerequisite for the exchange of opinions, are based on the respondent’s planned feedback. The differences between explicit and implicit feedback with stimulating messages are revealed. A working hypothesis is put forward that in blog communication, in comparison with oral spontaneous communication, implicit feedback plays a more constructive role and has a specific functional load due to the respondent’s delayed (asynchronous) response to the stimulus, the reactive activation of the means of establishing and maintaining phatic contact with the interlocutor and the subjective detailing of the dictal and/or modus content of the stimulating message. Due to the time and/or spatial distance between the interlocutors, as well as the presence of multiple respondents, feedback is predetermined by the addressee’s expectations regarding the planned interaction, and not by the fact of mutual recognition of individual intentions that characterize oral spontaneous communication. The projected response and mental representations of an imaginary responsive respondent shed light on the pragmatic differences between stimulating and responsive messages, through which the participants of the communication plan to continue the exchange of information and emotions. The repertoire of communicative strategies that acquire essential importance in the process of overcoming the problems of establishing and maintaining feedback in computer-mediated communication is determined. The current aspects of designing the interfaces of blogging platforms that influence the pragmatic contexts of feedback implementation are discussed. It is established that in blog interaction, when initiating a stimulating judgment, the lack of feedback can be a natural phenomenon that does not affect the effectiveness of communication. This idea confirms the hypothesis put forward and outlines the prospects for research.
博客文本中回应信息的语用结构与反馈形式的类型学
本文根据不同类型的反馈在对话者博客互动形式中的语用作用和功能负荷,对其进行了语言学分析。在博客交流的背景下,刺激性信息的发送者和接收者之间的对话关系是交换意见的先决条件,是基于受访者有计划的反馈。揭示了带有刺激信息的外显反馈和内隐反馈之间的差异。提出了一个工作假设,即在博客交流中,与口头自发交流相比,由于受访者对刺激的延迟(异步)反应,内隐反馈发挥了更具建设性的作用,并具有特定的功能负荷,与对话者建立和保持亲密联系的手段的反应性激活,以及刺激信息的格言和/或方式内容的主观细节。由于对话者之间的时间和/或空间距离,以及多个受访者的存在,反馈是由受访者对计划互动的期望预先确定的,而不是由口头自发交流中个人意图的相互认可这一事实预先确定的。想象中的回应者的投射反应和心理表征揭示了刺激性信息和回应性信息之间的语用差异,沟通参与者计划通过这些信息和情绪继续交流。确定了在克服计算机媒介通信中建立和保持反馈的问题的过程中获得重要意义的通信策略。讨论了博客平台界面设计的当前方面,这些方面会影响反馈实现的语用语境。在博客互动中,当发起一个刺激性的判断时,缺乏反馈可能是一种自然现象,不会影响沟通的有效性。这一观点证实了提出的假设,并概述了研究前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信