The Policy of Targeted Elimination of Poverty and Its Faulty Implementation: Findings from County A of Guangdong Province (精准扶贫中的政策执行偏差——基于广东省A 县的扶贫经验)
{"title":"The Policy of Targeted Elimination of Poverty and Its Faulty Implementation: Findings from County A of Guangdong Province (精准扶贫中的政策执行偏差——基于广东省A 县的扶贫经验)","authors":"Wanqun Liu, Hui-Lan Lin","doi":"10.1163/22136746-01501006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A nationwide campaign for poverty-elimination has been underway for years. This article examines the task of “double implementation” 双到 of poverty-alleviation policies in County A, and discusses the obvious faults in the process and the complicated factors behind such faults, including the constraints of objective conditions, the mandatory requirements for poverty elimination as a political task, the malfunctioning of mechanisms for correcting mistakes, and local government’s redefinition of policy objectives, etc. All these factors work together to make the work of poverty-elimination deviate from its original objectives, as well as to make the mechanism of “inter-government complicity” function to legitimate such deviation.近年来,一场大规模的扶贫运动在全国轰轰烈烈的开展起来。本文以A县前两轮扶贫“双到”工作为例,指出扶贫政策在实践中存在着明显的执行偏差。通过考察扶贫政策的具体执行过程,发现扶贫政策执行偏差的生成机制复杂而多元,包括客观条件限制、硬性扶贫政治任务约束、纠偏机制失灵、地方政府的政策目标替代等。这些因素之间相互交叠、彼此嵌套,使得扶贫工作逐步偏离原初的政策目标,并通过“政府间的共谋”的机制得以“合法化”。","PeriodicalId":37171,"journal":{"name":"Rural China","volume":"15 1","pages":"157-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22136746-01501006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-01501006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A nationwide campaign for poverty-elimination has been underway for years. This article examines the task of “double implementation” 双到 of poverty-alleviation policies in County A, and discusses the obvious faults in the process and the complicated factors behind such faults, including the constraints of objective conditions, the mandatory requirements for poverty elimination as a political task, the malfunctioning of mechanisms for correcting mistakes, and local government’s redefinition of policy objectives, etc. All these factors work together to make the work of poverty-elimination deviate from its original objectives, as well as to make the mechanism of “inter-government complicity” function to legitimate such deviation.近年来,一场大规模的扶贫运动在全国轰轰烈烈的开展起来。本文以A县前两轮扶贫“双到”工作为例,指出扶贫政策在实践中存在着明显的执行偏差。通过考察扶贫政策的具体执行过程,发现扶贫政策执行偏差的生成机制复杂而多元,包括客观条件限制、硬性扶贫政治任务约束、纠偏机制失灵、地方政府的政策目标替代等。这些因素之间相互交叠、彼此嵌套,使得扶贫工作逐步偏离原初的政策目标,并通过“政府间的共谋”的机制得以“合法化”。
The Policy of Targeted Elimination of Poverty and Its Faulty Implementation: Findings from County A of Guangdong Province
A nationwide campaign for power optimization has been under way for years This article examines the task of "double implementation" double to of power admission policies in County A, and discusses the objective faults in the process and the applied factors behind such faults, including the constraints of objective conditions, the mandatory requirements for power determination as a political task, the malfunctioning of mechanisms for correcting mistakes, In recent years, a large-scale poverty alleviation campaign has been vigorously carried out across the country. This article takes the first two rounds of poverty alleviation "double arrival" work in County A as an example, pointing out that there are obvious implementation deviations in poverty alleviation policies in practice. By examining the specific implementation process of poverty alleviation policies, it was found that the generation mechanisms of deviation in poverty alleviation policy implementation are complex and diverse, including objective conditions constraints, rigid poverty alleviation political task constraints, failure of correction mechanisms, and substitution of policy objectives by local governments. These factors overlap and nest with each other, gradually deviating from the original policy objectives of poverty alleviation work, and being "legalized" through the mechanism of "collusion between governments".