Sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Urology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000201
Cecile T Pham, Cameron J Parkin, James Kovacic, Siying Yeow, Yunzhi Yang, Danielle Delaney, Amanda Chung
{"title":"Sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.","authors":"Cecile T Pham, Cameron J Parkin, James Kovacic, Siying Yeow, Yunzhi Yang, Danielle Delaney, Amanda Chung","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited published data exist regarding the utility of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), consisting of only small case series, and, to our knowledge, no Australian data have been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SNM for treatment of NLUTD in Australian patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who received a permanent SNM implant between December 2014 and March 2021. Patients completed a urodynamic test preoperatively. They completed a 3-day bladder diary, uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual measurement preoperatively and at 6-month intervals postoperatively following SNM insertion. Urinary function, patient-reported outcome measures, and adverse events were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 patients received a permanent SNM implant. The mean duration of follow-up was 25 ± 20 months, with the majority (89%, n = 32) of patients reporting a >50% improvement on bladder diary evaluation. There was a significant increase in void volume (<i>p</i> < 0.001), decrease in postvoid residual (<i>p</i> < 0.001), decrease in voiding frequency (<i>p</i> < 0.001), decrease in incontinence episodes (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and decrease in pad number (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in peak flow (<i>p</i> = 0.21). There was no significant difference in SNM efficacy between patients with progressive or nonprogressive neurological conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation is a safe and effective therapy for NLUTD in the context of both progressive and nonprogressive neurological conditions. It should be offered more readily to patients with NLUTD as a minimally invasive treatment option with the potential to make clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":" ","pages":"280-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited published data exist regarding the utility of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), consisting of only small case series, and, to our knowledge, no Australian data have been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SNM for treatment of NLUTD in Australian patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who received a permanent SNM implant between December 2014 and March 2021. Patients completed a urodynamic test preoperatively. They completed a 3-day bladder diary, uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual measurement preoperatively and at 6-month intervals postoperatively following SNM insertion. Urinary function, patient-reported outcome measures, and adverse events were assessed.

Results: A total of 36 patients received a permanent SNM implant. The mean duration of follow-up was 25 ± 20 months, with the majority (89%, n = 32) of patients reporting a >50% improvement on bladder diary evaluation. There was a significant increase in void volume (p < 0.001), decrease in postvoid residual (p < 0.001), decrease in voiding frequency (p < 0.001), decrease in incontinence episodes (p = 0.002), and decrease in pad number (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in peak flow (p = 0.21). There was no significant difference in SNM efficacy between patients with progressive or nonprogressive neurological conditions.

Conclusions: Sacral neuromodulation is a safe and effective therapy for NLUTD in the context of both progressive and nonprogressive neurological conditions. It should be offered more readily to patients with NLUTD as a minimally invasive treatment option with the potential to make clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life.

Abstract Image

神经源性下尿路功能障碍患者的脊髓神经调控
背景:关于骶神经调节(SNM)治疗神经源性下尿路功能障碍(NLUTD)的应用的已发表的数据有限,仅包括小病例系列,据我们所知,澳大利亚尚未发表数据。本研究的目的是评估SNM治疗澳大利亚NLUTD患者的临床结果。方法:回顾性分析2014年12月至2021年3月期间接受永久SNM种植的患者。患者术前完成尿动力学检查。他们在术前和置入SNM后每隔6个月完成3天膀胱日记、尿流量测定和膀胱后残留测量。评估尿功能、患者报告的结果测量和不良事件。结果:共36例患者接受了永久SNM种植体。平均随访时间为25±20个月,大多数(89%,n = 32)患者报告膀胱日记评估改善了50%。排尿量显著增加(p < 0.001),排尿后残留减少(p < 0.001),排尿次数显著减少(p < 0.001),尿失禁次数显著减少(p = 0.002),尿垫数量显著减少(p < 0.001)。两组的峰值流量无显著差异(p = 0.21)。进展性或非进展性神经系统疾病患者的SNM疗效无显著差异。结论:骶神经调节对于进行性和非进行性神经系统疾病的NLUTD是一种安全有效的治疗方法。它应该更容易地提供给NLUTD患者,作为一种微创治疗选择,有可能在临床上有意义的改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信