“Count the Days by the Good Outcomes”: Family Farm Member Experiences with Stress and Coping

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Emily A. Paskewitz, Laura E. Miller, Victoria Bertram
{"title":"“Count the Days by the Good Outcomes”: Family Farm Member Experiences with Stress and Coping","authors":"Emily A. Paskewitz, Laura E. Miller, Victoria Bertram","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2218893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the last 50 years, the number of farms in the United States has declined by 33%, with family farms, which make up 96% of total farms, especially at risk. Despite dwindling numbers, the passion and heart of family farm members remain strong as they continue to farm. This study utilized stress and coping theory to explore family farm member experiences with stress and how they communicatively cope. Zoom interviews with 26 family farm members revealed two common stressors: (1) environmental and (2) financial. Participants also noted three coping strategies: (1) reframe to the family, (2) reframe to nature, and (3) reframe to the farmer identity. Results showed a complex network for managing stress that often characterizes objects as both stressor and coping technique. Theoretically, this article points to the importance of considering recurrent stressors, defined as stress generated from events outside of the individual’s ability to control, and that repeatedly occur within one’s environment. These data also highlight the need to integrate cognitive restructuring into stress and coping research, as participants reported reframing sources of stress as the sources for coping. Practically, we offer the following applied suggestions to address family farm member stress: (1) listen to and recognize farm stress and (2) teach coping skills.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"481 - 498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2218893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the last 50 years, the number of farms in the United States has declined by 33%, with family farms, which make up 96% of total farms, especially at risk. Despite dwindling numbers, the passion and heart of family farm members remain strong as they continue to farm. This study utilized stress and coping theory to explore family farm member experiences with stress and how they communicatively cope. Zoom interviews with 26 family farm members revealed two common stressors: (1) environmental and (2) financial. Participants also noted three coping strategies: (1) reframe to the family, (2) reframe to nature, and (3) reframe to the farmer identity. Results showed a complex network for managing stress that often characterizes objects as both stressor and coping technique. Theoretically, this article points to the importance of considering recurrent stressors, defined as stress generated from events outside of the individual’s ability to control, and that repeatedly occur within one’s environment. These data also highlight the need to integrate cognitive restructuring into stress and coping research, as participants reported reframing sources of stress as the sources for coping. Practically, we offer the following applied suggestions to address family farm member stress: (1) listen to and recognize farm stress and (2) teach coping skills.
“以好的结果来计算日子”:家庭农场成员的压力和应对经历
摘要过去50年 多年来,美国农场的数量下降了33%,家庭农场占农场总数的96%,尤其是面临风险的农场。尽管数量在减少,但随着家庭农场成员继续耕种,他们的热情和心仍然很强烈。本研究利用压力和应对理论来探索家庭农场成员的压力经历以及他们如何沟通应对。Zoom对26名家庭农场成员的采访揭示了两个常见的压力源:(1)环境和(2)财务。参与者还指出了三种应对策略:(1)重塑家庭,(2)重塑自然,(3)重塑农民身份。结果显示,管理压力的复杂网络通常将对象描述为压力源和应对技巧。从理论上讲,这篇文章指出了考虑反复压力源的重要性,反复压力源被定义为个人控制能力之外的事件产生的压力,并且在一个人的环境中反复发生。这些数据还强调了将认知重组纳入压力和应对研究的必要性,因为参与者报告称,将压力来源重新定义为应对来源。实际上,我们提出了以下实用建议来解决家庭农场成员的压力:(1)倾听和认识农场压力;(2)教授应对技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信