Physical Performance in Elderly Outpatients with Subclinical Hypothyroidism Compared with Euthyroid Counterparts

Abraham Vázquez-Garcia, L. C. Ibarra, J. Villarreal-Pérez, R. Meza, D. Gámez, J. Platt, Guillermo Guajardo-Álvarez, David E. Saucedo, Francisco Torres-Pérez
{"title":"Physical Performance in Elderly Outpatients with Subclinical Hypothyroidism Compared with Euthyroid Counterparts","authors":"Abraham Vázquez-Garcia, L. C. Ibarra, J. Villarreal-Pérez, R. Meza, D. Gámez, J. Platt, Guillermo Guajardo-Álvarez, David E. Saucedo, Francisco Torres-Pérez","doi":"10.4172/2167-7948.1000212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There continues to be controversy on the clinical relevance of elderly mild subclinical hypothyroidism (SH), defined as a TSH elevation (4.0-9.99 μIU/L) with normal free thyroxin levels. \nObjective: To compare physical performance (PP) in elderly individuals with a TSH level above normal range versus normal counterparts. Design: Case-control study of ambulatory patients enrolled between January 2009 and December 2010. Setting: Outpatient geriatric service. \nParticipants: Elderly individuals 65-84 years old (y/o) with SH and without conditions known to affect physical mobility. \nMeasurements: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was performed. The statistical analysis used the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (M-H-OR) method and Student’s t test with an alpha of 0.05. Results: Of the183 individuals screened, 28 (15.3%) had SH. The study response was 89.3%, thus 25 individuals with SH were compared to 27 euthyroid controls matched by age and sex. Gender and age influence SPPB, increased age was associated with <4 points balance: 13.8% in 65-74 y/o vs. 44.0% in 75-84 y/o, χ2=6.1, p<0.05; strength of dominant leg and SPPB score were higher in men than women (both, p<0.05). Body mass index was higher in SH than controls in men (29.3 ± 2 vs. 23.4 ± 3, t=3.2, <0.02). Women with SH had a worse SPPB score than the control group, M-H-OR=8.4, p<0.05. Confidence intervals of mean gait speed were 0.73-0.95 vs. 0.98-1.14 m/s, respectively with results in men lacking significance. Chair stands were longer in SH than controls: 13.5 ± 2.4 vs. 10.0 ± 1.7 seconds for men and 20.6 ± 12.6 vs. 14.8 ± 2.9 seconds for women, both p<0.05. \nConclusions: These data suggests an association between SH and lower physcial performance. This warrants further study to define if T4 supplementation improves physcial performance, thus preventing frailty.","PeriodicalId":91565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thyroid disorders & therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-7948.1000212","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thyroid disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7948.1000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There continues to be controversy on the clinical relevance of elderly mild subclinical hypothyroidism (SH), defined as a TSH elevation (4.0-9.99 μIU/L) with normal free thyroxin levels. Objective: To compare physical performance (PP) in elderly individuals with a TSH level above normal range versus normal counterparts. Design: Case-control study of ambulatory patients enrolled between January 2009 and December 2010. Setting: Outpatient geriatric service. Participants: Elderly individuals 65-84 years old (y/o) with SH and without conditions known to affect physical mobility. Measurements: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was performed. The statistical analysis used the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (M-H-OR) method and Student’s t test with an alpha of 0.05. Results: Of the183 individuals screened, 28 (15.3%) had SH. The study response was 89.3%, thus 25 individuals with SH were compared to 27 euthyroid controls matched by age and sex. Gender and age influence SPPB, increased age was associated with <4 points balance: 13.8% in 65-74 y/o vs. 44.0% in 75-84 y/o, χ2=6.1, p<0.05; strength of dominant leg and SPPB score were higher in men than women (both, p<0.05). Body mass index was higher in SH than controls in men (29.3 ± 2 vs. 23.4 ± 3, t=3.2, <0.02). Women with SH had a worse SPPB score than the control group, M-H-OR=8.4, p<0.05. Confidence intervals of mean gait speed were 0.73-0.95 vs. 0.98-1.14 m/s, respectively with results in men lacking significance. Chair stands were longer in SH than controls: 13.5 ± 2.4 vs. 10.0 ± 1.7 seconds for men and 20.6 ± 12.6 vs. 14.8 ± 2.9 seconds for women, both p<0.05. Conclusions: These data suggests an association between SH and lower physcial performance. This warrants further study to define if T4 supplementation improves physcial performance, thus preventing frailty.
亚临床甲状腺功能减退症老年门诊患者与甲状腺功能正常患者的身体表现比较
背景:关于老年轻度亚临床甲状腺功能减退症(SH)的临床相关性仍存在争议,SH被定义为TSH升高(4.0-9.99μIU/L),游离甲状腺素水平正常。目的:比较TSH水平高于正常范围的老年人与正常人的身体表现(PP)。设计:2009年1月至2010年12月期间入选的门诊患者的病例对照研究。设置:老年门诊服务。参与者:65-84岁(y/o)患有SH且没有已知影响身体活动的条件的老年人。测量:进行了短物理性能电池(SPPB)。统计分析采用Mantel Haenszel比值比(M-H-OR)法和Student t检验,α为0.05。结果:在筛选的183名个体中,28名(15.3%)患有SH。研究应答率为89.3%,因此将25名患有SH的个体与27名按年龄和性别匹配的甲状腺功能正常对照进行比较。性别和年龄影响SPPB,年龄增加与<4分平衡相关:65-74年为13.8%,75-84年为44.0%,χ2=6.1,p<0.05;男性的优势腿力量和SPPB评分高于女性(均p<0.05)。SH的体重指数高于男性对照组(29.3±2 vs.23.4±3,t=3.2,<0.02)。SH女性的SPPB评分低于对照组,M-H-OR=8.4,p<0.05。平均步态速度的置信区间分别为0.73-0.95和0.98-1.14 m/s,男性的结果缺乏显著性。SH的椅子支架比对照组长:男性为13.5±2.4秒对10.0±1.7秒,女性为20.6±12.6秒对14.8±2.9秒,均p<0.05。结论:这些数据表明SH与较低的身体表现之间存在关联。这就需要进一步研究,以确定补充T4是否能改善身体机能,从而预防虚弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书