Introduction to the special issue on “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains”
{"title":"Introduction to the special issue on “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains”","authors":"Gregory R. Heim, Xiaosong (David) Peng","doi":"10.1002/joom.1216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technology Management (TM) has long held an important place in operations management (OM) literature. Since the 1990s, TM topics have made up a substantial portion of the papers published in <i>Journal of Operations Management</i> (JOM). Today, the speed of development and innovative uses of new technologies across the globe create many new research opportunities and challenges (Heim et al., <span>2021</span>), motivating the current special issue.</p><p>TM research often overlaps with other academic research fields (e.g., technology innovation in organization strategy, information technology [IT] in management information systems [MIS]). Yet, TM issues of interest to operations managers tend to differ in focus, detail, time horizon, and scope from the issues examined in those literatures. TM research in JOM usually delves into the within-firm interface between technology and process change as well as the performance impacts of technology on operations (as explained in the TM department's recent editorial [Heim et al., <span>2021</span>]).</p><p>Technology concerns the application of resources and skills by humans to achieve specific aims. Burgelman et al. (<span>2003</span>) defined technology as “theoretical and practical knowledge, skills, and artifacts that can be used to develop products and services as well as their production and delivery systems.” Along similar lines, Gaimon (<span>2008</span>) defined technology as “the embodiment and deployment of technical and scientific knowledge and discoveries that lead to the creation of goods and services.” Changes in technology can lead to substantial changes in the organization and accomplishment of work (Browning, <span>2020</span>; Heim & Peng, <span>2010</span>; Jaikumar, <span>1988</span>). TM<sup>1</sup> provides an inclusive term for managerial activities and academic research pertaining to the generation, deployment, and use of technology. Gaimon (<span>2008</span>) suggested the TM field addresses “how to develop, adapt, and exploit technological capabilities to create new or improved products or services to accomplish the strategic goals of an organization.”</p><p>Diverse contemporary technology developments provide many new research contexts and questions, seeding the research questions behind the innovative papers in this Special Issue. This diversity required that we keep an open mind regarding what research topics today reside among the scope of issues for TM research in OM and supply chain management (OM/SCM). The technology used today for process change may come in the form of software codes, hardware, material processing and handling technology, and consumer devices and enterprise applications. With an increasing need for global, real-time integration and coordination of demand and supply, operations managers must continue to evaluate and install new technology configurations to deploy processes that hopefully will accomplish their aims.</p><p>Ultimately, operations managers are responsible for making sure that the coordinated use of modern technology ensures the intended outcomes of operational systems, whether for local, idiosyncratic needs or global, enterprise needs. Today's operations managers are often actively involved in technology decisions, partnering with top management (and many other stakeholders) during technology selection, installation, and lifecycle decisions. Operations managers must nurture collaborative partnerships to ensure technology evaluation and implementation decisions are aligned with the sourcing and delivery needs of manufacturing and service operations.</p><p>With the above as context, we offer a collection of what we believe are excellent papers examining contemporary topics related to the special issue's theme of “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains.” We begin by first reviewing JOM's historical contributions to classic TM research themes and acknowledging the corpus of TM literature in JOM to which this SI contributes. This exercise then enables us to offer up initial responses to the questions, “What's missing?” and “What's next?”</p><p>The editorial is structured as follows. Section 2 discusses TM empirical research achievements to date, focusing on JOM. Section 3 introduces the papers in this special issue, suggests what research may still be missing, and points out where TM research efforts might focus next. Section 4 concludes and thanks the Reviewers and Editors who made this special issue possible.</p><p>As a prologue for the special issue, we gather existing JOM papers that fall within the historical scope of TM literature. In the early years of JOM (1980s), a focus on emerging technology and its consequences started with research enquiries into technology choice, group technology, and material requirements planning (MRP) systems. This research later transitioned toward impacts of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems (1990s). Post-2000 research examined implications of internet-based technology implemented then, dramatically affecting modern OM/SCM processes. Overall, JOM authors have made significant contributions to insights about OM/SCM technology and TM roles in OM/SCM.</p><p>We chose our list of JOM's TM articles to discuss in a structured manner. To identify articles, we performed searches on JOM's Elsevier and Wiley search engine websites<sup>2</sup> using terms such as “technology”, “technology management”, “IT”, “information technology”, “technology strategy”, “technology outsourcing”, and terms specifically related to each topic area. We considered whether each suggested paper fit within TM. The articles were subjectively categorized into groups. We synthesize the articles for each group. Still, the following discussion should not be viewed as comprehensive in a scientific sense.<sup>3</sup> We simply hope to convey the enormous breadth of TM research insights from JOM as well as provide context for the Special Issue.</p><p>We next summarize prior TM literature from JOM. We first group JOM's TM studies into classic TM topics about how to make sense of technology, evaluate and select technology, innovate via technology and diffuse technology to users, choose and adopt technology, design/redesign technology, use and react to technology, learn via technology, develop technology, integrate technology, improve firm performance via technology-enabled operations and supply chains, and outsource technology-enabled systems and services. We then group salient JOM TM studies by their technology application focus: manufacturing, service, retail, healthcare, enterprise/inter-enterprise, e-business, and new product/new service technology. We acknowledge papers in JOM often incorporate two or more TM themes, making any categorization of prior papers imprecise. Still, while our classification is by no means perfect, it is illustrative of the topical associations for historical TM papers from JOM.</p><p>Given the many ongoing developments in technology, technological innovation in products and services, and TM across the globe, we believe it is a fantastic time to work on TM research. We have enjoyed guiding the submitted papers through the review process and hope we have been fair with our guidance and decisions about which papers to ultimately include in this special issue. We also hope the reader will enjoy reading this special issue as much as we have enjoyed working through the process of developing the authors' manuscripts.</p><p>Finally, we note this special issue is the product of many individuals' efforts. We deeply thank the many Special Guest Editors, Associate Editors, Editorial Review Board members, and Reviewers who contributed their time and talents to serve in developmental roles for the special issue. Without their efforts to nurture the papers, this special set of papers about modern technology developments would not have come to fruition.</p><p><b>Special Issue Guest Editors:</b></p><p>Gregory R. Heim, Texas A&M University</p><p>Xiaosong (David) Peng, Lehigh University</p><p>Guangzhi Shang, Florida State University (handled one paper due to conflict of interest with the other Guest Editors)</p><p><b>Associate Editors:</b></p><p>Anupam Agrawal, Texas A&M University</p><p>Daniel Q. Chen, Texas Christian University</p><p>Adrian Choo, Michigan State University</p><p>David Dobrzykowski, University of Arkansas</p><p>Yan Dong, University of South Carolina</p><p>Cheryl Druehl, George Mason University</p><p>Matthias Holweg, University of Oxford</p><p>Kevin Linderman, Pennsylvania State University</p><p>Guanyi Lu, Florida State University</p><p>Rich Metters, Texas A&M University</p><p>Annibal Sodero, The Ohio State University</p><p>Rui Souza, Catholic University of Portugal</p><p>Martin Spring, Lancaster University</p><p>Gregory Stock, Northern Arizona University</p><p>Sriram Thirumalai, Texas Christian University</p><p>Stephan Wagner, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich</p><p>Frank Weingarten, ESADE Business School</p><p>Kefeng Xu, The University of Texas at San Antonio</p><p><b>Special Issue Guest Associate Editors:</b></p><p>Ednilson Bernardes, West Virginia University</p><p>Jun Li, University of Michigan</p><p><b>Editorial Review Board and Ad Hoc Reviewers:</b></p><p>George Ball, Indiana University</p><p>Aaron Bonnett, Texas A&M University</p><p>Alistair Brandon-Jones, University of Bath</p><p>Carlos Candido, University of Algarve</p><p>Tsan-Ming Choi, National Taiwan University</p><p>Howard Chuang, National Chengchi University</p><p>Yun-Kung Chung, Yuan-Ze University</p><p>Pamela Danese, University of Padova</p><p>Xin (David) Ding, Rutgers Business School</p><p>Michael Dixon, Utah State University</p><p>Kevin Dooley, Arizona State University</p><p>Necati Ertekin, University of Minnesota</p><p>Shaokun Fan, Oregon State University</p><p>Jordana George, Texas A&M University</p><p>Jing Gong, Lehigh University</p><p>Jury Gualandris, Western University</p><p>Xiaowen Huang, Miami University</p><p>Noyan Ilk, Florida State University</p><p>Xingzhi Jia, Renmin University of China</p><p>Justin Kistler, University of Tennessee, Knoxville</p><p>Maneesh Kumar, Cardiff University</p><p>Hugo Lam, The University of Liverpool</p><p>Benn Lawson, University of Cambridge</p><p>Seung Jun Lee, Chung-Ang University</p><p>Xiaojin Liu, Virginia Commonwealth University</p><p>Mayukh Majumdar, University of San Diego</p><p>Erika Marsillac, Old Dominion University</p><p>Brett Massimino, Virginia Commonwealth University</p><p>Saif Mir, Lehigh University</p><p>Ujjal Mukherjee, University of Illinois</p><p>Adegoke Oke, Arizona State University</p><p>Carrie Queenan, University of South Carolina</p><p>Yoonseock Son, University of Notre Dame</p><p>Jon Stauffer, Texas A&M University</p><p>Fabian Sting, Erasmus University</p><p>Caroline Swift, University of Delaware</p><p>Frédéric Thiesse, University of Würzburg</p><p>Sriram Venkataraman, University of South Carolina</p><p>Ivanka Visnjic, ESADE Business School</p><p>Matthew Walsman, Rutgers University</p><p>Lan Wang, University of Miami</p><p>Urban Wemmerlov, University of Wisconsin-Madison</p><p>Xun Xu, California State University, Stanislaus</p><p>Yang Yang, University of Texas at El Paso</p><p>Dawei (David) Zhang, Lehigh University</p><p>Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang, University of North Florida</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"68 6-7","pages":"536-559"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1216","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.1216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Technology Management (TM) has long held an important place in operations management (OM) literature. Since the 1990s, TM topics have made up a substantial portion of the papers published in Journal of Operations Management (JOM). Today, the speed of development and innovative uses of new technologies across the globe create many new research opportunities and challenges (Heim et al., 2021), motivating the current special issue.
TM research often overlaps with other academic research fields (e.g., technology innovation in organization strategy, information technology [IT] in management information systems [MIS]). Yet, TM issues of interest to operations managers tend to differ in focus, detail, time horizon, and scope from the issues examined in those literatures. TM research in JOM usually delves into the within-firm interface between technology and process change as well as the performance impacts of technology on operations (as explained in the TM department's recent editorial [Heim et al., 2021]).
Technology concerns the application of resources and skills by humans to achieve specific aims. Burgelman et al. (2003) defined technology as “theoretical and practical knowledge, skills, and artifacts that can be used to develop products and services as well as their production and delivery systems.” Along similar lines, Gaimon (2008) defined technology as “the embodiment and deployment of technical and scientific knowledge and discoveries that lead to the creation of goods and services.” Changes in technology can lead to substantial changes in the organization and accomplishment of work (Browning, 2020; Heim & Peng, 2010; Jaikumar, 1988). TM1 provides an inclusive term for managerial activities and academic research pertaining to the generation, deployment, and use of technology. Gaimon (2008) suggested the TM field addresses “how to develop, adapt, and exploit technological capabilities to create new or improved products or services to accomplish the strategic goals of an organization.”
Diverse contemporary technology developments provide many new research contexts and questions, seeding the research questions behind the innovative papers in this Special Issue. This diversity required that we keep an open mind regarding what research topics today reside among the scope of issues for TM research in OM and supply chain management (OM/SCM). The technology used today for process change may come in the form of software codes, hardware, material processing and handling technology, and consumer devices and enterprise applications. With an increasing need for global, real-time integration and coordination of demand and supply, operations managers must continue to evaluate and install new technology configurations to deploy processes that hopefully will accomplish their aims.
Ultimately, operations managers are responsible for making sure that the coordinated use of modern technology ensures the intended outcomes of operational systems, whether for local, idiosyncratic needs or global, enterprise needs. Today's operations managers are often actively involved in technology decisions, partnering with top management (and many other stakeholders) during technology selection, installation, and lifecycle decisions. Operations managers must nurture collaborative partnerships to ensure technology evaluation and implementation decisions are aligned with the sourcing and delivery needs of manufacturing and service operations.
With the above as context, we offer a collection of what we believe are excellent papers examining contemporary topics related to the special issue's theme of “Technology management in a global context: From enterprise systems to technology disrupting operations and supply chains.” We begin by first reviewing JOM's historical contributions to classic TM research themes and acknowledging the corpus of TM literature in JOM to which this SI contributes. This exercise then enables us to offer up initial responses to the questions, “What's missing?” and “What's next?”
The editorial is structured as follows. Section 2 discusses TM empirical research achievements to date, focusing on JOM. Section 3 introduces the papers in this special issue, suggests what research may still be missing, and points out where TM research efforts might focus next. Section 4 concludes and thanks the Reviewers and Editors who made this special issue possible.
As a prologue for the special issue, we gather existing JOM papers that fall within the historical scope of TM literature. In the early years of JOM (1980s), a focus on emerging technology and its consequences started with research enquiries into technology choice, group technology, and material requirements planning (MRP) systems. This research later transitioned toward impacts of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems (1990s). Post-2000 research examined implications of internet-based technology implemented then, dramatically affecting modern OM/SCM processes. Overall, JOM authors have made significant contributions to insights about OM/SCM technology and TM roles in OM/SCM.
We chose our list of JOM's TM articles to discuss in a structured manner. To identify articles, we performed searches on JOM's Elsevier and Wiley search engine websites2 using terms such as “technology”, “technology management”, “IT”, “information technology”, “technology strategy”, “technology outsourcing”, and terms specifically related to each topic area. We considered whether each suggested paper fit within TM. The articles were subjectively categorized into groups. We synthesize the articles for each group. Still, the following discussion should not be viewed as comprehensive in a scientific sense.3 We simply hope to convey the enormous breadth of TM research insights from JOM as well as provide context for the Special Issue.
We next summarize prior TM literature from JOM. We first group JOM's TM studies into classic TM topics about how to make sense of technology, evaluate and select technology, innovate via technology and diffuse technology to users, choose and adopt technology, design/redesign technology, use and react to technology, learn via technology, develop technology, integrate technology, improve firm performance via technology-enabled operations and supply chains, and outsource technology-enabled systems and services. We then group salient JOM TM studies by their technology application focus: manufacturing, service, retail, healthcare, enterprise/inter-enterprise, e-business, and new product/new service technology. We acknowledge papers in JOM often incorporate two or more TM themes, making any categorization of prior papers imprecise. Still, while our classification is by no means perfect, it is illustrative of the topical associations for historical TM papers from JOM.
Given the many ongoing developments in technology, technological innovation in products and services, and TM across the globe, we believe it is a fantastic time to work on TM research. We have enjoyed guiding the submitted papers through the review process and hope we have been fair with our guidance and decisions about which papers to ultimately include in this special issue. We also hope the reader will enjoy reading this special issue as much as we have enjoyed working through the process of developing the authors' manuscripts.
Finally, we note this special issue is the product of many individuals' efforts. We deeply thank the many Special Guest Editors, Associate Editors, Editorial Review Board members, and Reviewers who contributed their time and talents to serve in developmental roles for the special issue. Without their efforts to nurture the papers, this special set of papers about modern technology developments would not have come to fruition.
Special Issue Guest Editors:
Gregory R. Heim, Texas A&M University
Xiaosong (David) Peng, Lehigh University
Guangzhi Shang, Florida State University (handled one paper due to conflict of interest with the other Guest Editors)
Associate Editors:
Anupam Agrawal, Texas A&M University
Daniel Q. Chen, Texas Christian University
Adrian Choo, Michigan State University
David Dobrzykowski, University of Arkansas
Yan Dong, University of South Carolina
Cheryl Druehl, George Mason University
Matthias Holweg, University of Oxford
Kevin Linderman, Pennsylvania State University
Guanyi Lu, Florida State University
Rich Metters, Texas A&M University
Annibal Sodero, The Ohio State University
Rui Souza, Catholic University of Portugal
Martin Spring, Lancaster University
Gregory Stock, Northern Arizona University
Sriram Thirumalai, Texas Christian University
Stephan Wagner, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Frank Weingarten, ESADE Business School
Kefeng Xu, The University of Texas at San Antonio
Special Issue Guest Associate Editors:
Ednilson Bernardes, West Virginia University
Jun Li, University of Michigan
Editorial Review Board and Ad Hoc Reviewers:
George Ball, Indiana University
Aaron Bonnett, Texas A&M University
Alistair Brandon-Jones, University of Bath
Carlos Candido, University of Algarve
Tsan-Ming Choi, National Taiwan University
Howard Chuang, National Chengchi University
Yun-Kung Chung, Yuan-Ze University
Pamela Danese, University of Padova
Xin (David) Ding, Rutgers Business School
Michael Dixon, Utah State University
Kevin Dooley, Arizona State University
Necati Ertekin, University of Minnesota
Shaokun Fan, Oregon State University
Jordana George, Texas A&M University
Jing Gong, Lehigh University
Jury Gualandris, Western University
Xiaowen Huang, Miami University
Noyan Ilk, Florida State University
Xingzhi Jia, Renmin University of China
Justin Kistler, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Maneesh Kumar, Cardiff University
Hugo Lam, The University of Liverpool
Benn Lawson, University of Cambridge
Seung Jun Lee, Chung-Ang University
Xiaojin Liu, Virginia Commonwealth University
Mayukh Majumdar, University of San Diego
Erika Marsillac, Old Dominion University
Brett Massimino, Virginia Commonwealth University
Saif Mir, Lehigh University
Ujjal Mukherjee, University of Illinois
Adegoke Oke, Arizona State University
Carrie Queenan, University of South Carolina
Yoonseock Son, University of Notre Dame
Jon Stauffer, Texas A&M University
Fabian Sting, Erasmus University
Caroline Swift, University of Delaware
Frédéric Thiesse, University of Würzburg
Sriram Venkataraman, University of South Carolina
Ivanka Visnjic, ESADE Business School
Matthew Walsman, Rutgers University
Lan Wang, University of Miami
Urban Wemmerlov, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Xun Xu, California State University, Stanislaus
Yang Yang, University of Texas at El Paso
Dawei (David) Zhang, Lehigh University
Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang, University of North Florida
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement.
JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough.
Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification.
JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.