Pensamento Feminista Hoje: Perspectivas Decoloniais. Heloísa Buarque de Hollanda, editor. Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020 (ISBN: 978-85-69924-78-4)

IF 1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Erica L. Williams
{"title":"Pensamento Feminista Hoje: Perspectivas Decoloniais. Heloísa Buarque de Hollanda, editor. Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020 (ISBN: 978-85-69924-78-4)","authors":"Erica L. Williams","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2022.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I received the invitation to review Pensamento Feminista Hoje: Perspectivas Decoloniais (Feminist Thought Today: Decolonial Perspectives), I was excited to engage in this work that centers leading feminist scholars from around the world, published in Portuguese. However, my second thought was, they do realize that I’m a feminist anthropologist, and not a feminist philosopher, right? In this essay, I will offer a brief description and overview of the book, as well as a detailed description of a subset of essays that offer key contributions, from my perspective as a Black feminist anthropologist. A key strength of this book is the national, regional, linguistic, racial, and ethnic diversity of the contributors. Of the twenty-two contributors, eleven are from Brazil, two are from Ecuador, two are from Bolivia, and two are from the Dominican Republic, as well as one contributor each from Colombia, Argentina, Peru, Algeria, and Nigeria. Eight of the contributors self-identify as Black. In this sense, the editor, Heloisa Buarque de Hollanda, certainly reflects an awareness of the diversity of women’s lives and transnational feminist perspectives. The book is divided into three major sections: “Desafiando Matrizes” (Challenging Matrices); “Práticas Decolonais” (Decolonial Practices); and “Outras Línguas: Três Artistas Brasileiras” (Other Languages: Three Brazilian Artists). The editor admits that these divisions are arbitrary, and that they “reinforce the urgency of eliminating the binary between theory and practice” (30). The book consists of an introduction, sixteen chapters, and includes three artist profiles at the end. In the introduction, Buarque de Hollanda offers an overview of the decolonial turn, summarizing some of the key interventions of Nelson Maldonado-Torres, Anibal Quijano, and María Lugones. Maldonado-Torres defines the decolonial turn as “a movement of political and epistemological resistance to the logic of modernity/coloniality” (16). Buarque de Hollanda asserts that decolonial feminism “denounces the structural imbrication of notions of heteronormativity, racial classification, and the capitalist system” (17). She provides a chapter overview that highlights key interventions from the contributors, such as Julieta Paredes’s concept of “community feminism,” and Maria da Graça Costa’s argument that feminism is crucial to agroecology. The “Challenging Matrices” section opens with a foundational 1988 essay by Afro-Brazilian feminist scholar Lélia Gonzalez, which denounces how feminism has often “forgotten” about the racial question. Drawing upon Lacanian thought, Gonzalez argues that Black women have been “spoken about, defined and classified","PeriodicalId":47921,"journal":{"name":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2022.43","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When I received the invitation to review Pensamento Feminista Hoje: Perspectivas Decoloniais (Feminist Thought Today: Decolonial Perspectives), I was excited to engage in this work that centers leading feminist scholars from around the world, published in Portuguese. However, my second thought was, they do realize that I’m a feminist anthropologist, and not a feminist philosopher, right? In this essay, I will offer a brief description and overview of the book, as well as a detailed description of a subset of essays that offer key contributions, from my perspective as a Black feminist anthropologist. A key strength of this book is the national, regional, linguistic, racial, and ethnic diversity of the contributors. Of the twenty-two contributors, eleven are from Brazil, two are from Ecuador, two are from Bolivia, and two are from the Dominican Republic, as well as one contributor each from Colombia, Argentina, Peru, Algeria, and Nigeria. Eight of the contributors self-identify as Black. In this sense, the editor, Heloisa Buarque de Hollanda, certainly reflects an awareness of the diversity of women’s lives and transnational feminist perspectives. The book is divided into three major sections: “Desafiando Matrizes” (Challenging Matrices); “Práticas Decolonais” (Decolonial Practices); and “Outras Línguas: Três Artistas Brasileiras” (Other Languages: Three Brazilian Artists). The editor admits that these divisions are arbitrary, and that they “reinforce the urgency of eliminating the binary between theory and practice” (30). The book consists of an introduction, sixteen chapters, and includes three artist profiles at the end. In the introduction, Buarque de Hollanda offers an overview of the decolonial turn, summarizing some of the key interventions of Nelson Maldonado-Torres, Anibal Quijano, and María Lugones. Maldonado-Torres defines the decolonial turn as “a movement of political and epistemological resistance to the logic of modernity/coloniality” (16). Buarque de Hollanda asserts that decolonial feminism “denounces the structural imbrication of notions of heteronormativity, racial classification, and the capitalist system” (17). She provides a chapter overview that highlights key interventions from the contributors, such as Julieta Paredes’s concept of “community feminism,” and Maria da Graça Costa’s argument that feminism is crucial to agroecology. The “Challenging Matrices” section opens with a foundational 1988 essay by Afro-Brazilian feminist scholar Lélia Gonzalez, which denounces how feminism has often “forgotten” about the racial question. Drawing upon Lacanian thought, Gonzalez argues that Black women have been “spoken about, defined and classified
今天的女权主义思想:非殖民化视角。Heloísa Buarque de Hollanda,编辑。里约热内卢:Bazar do Tempo,2020(国际标准图书编号:978-85-69924-78-4)
当我收到评论《Pensameto Feminista Hoje:Perspectivas Decolonias》(今日女权主义思想:非殖民化视角)的邀请时,我很高兴能参与这项以葡萄牙语出版的以世界各地领先女权主义学者为中心的工作。然而,我的第二个想法是,他们确实意识到我是一位女权主义人类学家,而不是女权主义哲学家,对吧?在这篇文章中,我将从我作为一名黑人女权主义人类学家的角度,对这本书进行简要描述和概述,并对一些有重要贡献的文章进行详细描述。这本书的一个关键优势是作者的国家、地区、语言、种族和民族多样性。在22个捐款人中,11个来自巴西,2个来自厄瓜多尔,2个玻利维亚,2个多米尼加共和国,哥伦比亚、阿根廷、秘鲁、阿尔及利亚和尼日利亚各有一个捐款人。其中八位贡献者自称为黑人。从这个意义上说,编辑Heloisa Buarque de Hollanda无疑反映了对女性生活多样性和跨国女权主义观点的认识。这本书分为三个主要部分:“Desafiando矩阵”(挑战矩阵);“Práticas Decolonais”(非殖民化实践);以及“Outras Línguas:Três Artistas Brasileiras”(其他语言:三位巴西艺术家)。编辑承认,这些划分是武断的,它们“加强了消除理论和实践之间二元性的紧迫性”(30)。这本书由十六章的引言组成,最后包括三个艺术家简介。在引言中,Buarque de Hollanda概述了非殖民化的转变,总结了Nelson Maldonado Torres、Anibal Quijano和María Lugones的一些关键干预措施。马尔多纳多·托雷斯将非殖民化转向定义为“对现代性/殖民主义逻辑的政治和认识论抵抗运动”(16)。Buarque de Hollanda断言,非殖民化女权主义“谴责非规范性、种族分类和资本主义制度概念的结构性重叠”(17)。她提供了一章概述,重点介绍了作者的关键干预措施,如Julieta Paredes的“社区女权主义”概念,以及Maria da Graça Costa关于女权主义对农业生态学至关重要的论点。“挑战矩阵”部分以1988年非裔巴西女权主义学者Lélia Gonzalez的一篇基础文章开场,该文章谴责女权主义如何经常“忘记”种族问题。冈萨雷斯借鉴拉康主义思想,认为黑人女性已经“被谈论、定义和分类”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信