Awareness of Olfactory Dysfunction in Subjective Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Decline, and Alzheimer’s Disease

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 Neuroscience
R. Tahmasebi, S. Zehetmayer, E. Stögmann, Johann Lehrner
{"title":"Awareness of Olfactory Dysfunction in Subjective Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Decline, and Alzheimer’s Disease","authors":"R. Tahmasebi,&nbsp;S. Zehetmayer,&nbsp;E. Stögmann,&nbsp;Johann Lehrner","doi":"10.1007/s12078-019-09267-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hyposmia and metacognitive errors are related to aging, depression, male gender, and cognitive decline. The current study investigated the awareness of olfactory dysfunction in subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as well as the influence of additional factors.</p><p>A sample of 641 patients, including controls, SCD, non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), amnestic MCI (aMCI), and AD patients, was assessed with the Sniffin’ Sticks odor identification test (OIT) and the subjective olfactory capability (SOC) scale, in addition to measures of depressive symptoms, verbal memory, and executive functioning. Olfactory awareness groups were formed by means of the cutoffs of the OIT and the SOC.</p><p>Moderate and small, although significant, correlations between the OIT and the SOC were found among the study groups, with a significant discrimination of measured olfactory function via subjective assessment existing among controls but not among patients with AD. Of all AD patients, 34% overrated their sense of smell while 21% correctly identified themselves as being hyposmic, as opposed to corresponding 6% and 1% of healthy elderly. Overraters and correct hyposmic participants showed higher age and worse verbal memory and executive functions.</p><p>Reduced odor identification might underlie the same pathological changes within the brain as cognitive impairment and could serve as an additional marker for the development of AD.</p><p>Although people with AD are aware of hyposmia to some extent, the majority is affected by overestimation of the ability to smell, making the combination of subjective ratings and measures of olfactory function an interesting topic for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":516,"journal":{"name":"Chemosensory Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-019-09267-7","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosensory Perception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-019-09267-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Hyposmia and metacognitive errors are related to aging, depression, male gender, and cognitive decline. The current study investigated the awareness of olfactory dysfunction in subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as well as the influence of additional factors.

A sample of 641 patients, including controls, SCD, non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), amnestic MCI (aMCI), and AD patients, was assessed with the Sniffin’ Sticks odor identification test (OIT) and the subjective olfactory capability (SOC) scale, in addition to measures of depressive symptoms, verbal memory, and executive functioning. Olfactory awareness groups were formed by means of the cutoffs of the OIT and the SOC.

Moderate and small, although significant, correlations between the OIT and the SOC were found among the study groups, with a significant discrimination of measured olfactory function via subjective assessment existing among controls but not among patients with AD. Of all AD patients, 34% overrated their sense of smell while 21% correctly identified themselves as being hyposmic, as opposed to corresponding 6% and 1% of healthy elderly. Overraters and correct hyposmic participants showed higher age and worse verbal memory and executive functions.

Reduced odor identification might underlie the same pathological changes within the brain as cognitive impairment and could serve as an additional marker for the development of AD.

Although people with AD are aware of hyposmia to some extent, the majority is affected by overestimation of the ability to smell, making the combination of subjective ratings and measures of olfactory function an interesting topic for further research.

Abstract Image

嗅觉功能障碍在主观认知衰退、轻度认知衰退和阿尔茨海默病中的意识
低认知和元认知错误与衰老、抑郁、男性和认知能力下降有关。本研究探讨了主观认知衰退(SCD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者对嗅觉功能障碍的认识,以及其他因素的影响。641例患者,包括对照组、SCD、非遗忘性MCI (naMCI)、遗忘性MCI (aMCI)和AD患者,采用嗅嗅棒气味识别测试(OIT)和主观嗅觉能力(SOC)量表进行评估,此外还测量了抑郁症状、言语记忆和执行功能。嗅觉意识组是通过OIT和SOC的截断而形成的。在各研究组中发现OIT和SOC之间存在中度和小的相关性,尽管显著,通过主观评估测量的嗅觉功能在对照组中存在显著的区别,但在AD患者中没有。在所有AD患者中,34%的人高估了他们的嗅觉,而21%的人正确地将自己识别为嗅觉减退,而健康老年人中相应的比例为6%和1%。高估者和正确假设者表现出更高的年龄和更差的言语记忆和执行功能。气味识别能力的降低可能是大脑内与认知障碍相同的病理变化的基础,并可能作为AD发展的额外标志。尽管阿尔茨海默病患者在一定程度上意识到嗅觉不足,但大多数人都受到对嗅觉能力高估的影响,这使得主观评分和嗅觉功能测量的结合成为一个值得进一步研究的有趣话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemosensory Perception
Chemosensory Perception 农林科学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coverage in Chemosensory Perception includes animal work with implications for human phenomena and explores the following areas: Identification of chemicals producing sensory response; Identification of sensory response associated with chemicals; Human in vivo response to chemical stimuli; Human in vitro response to chemical stimuli; Neuroimaging of chemosensory function; Neurological processing of chemoreception; Chemoreception mechanisms; Psychophysics of chemoperception; Trigeminal function; Multisensory perception; Contextual effect on chemoperception; Behavioral response to chemical stimuli; Physiological factors affecting and contributing to chemoperception; Flavor and hedonics; Memory and chemoperception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信