{"title":"Dynamic study of immunoregulatory factors and tumor markers in patients with advanced gastric cancer before and after chemotherapy","authors":"Shi-Yu Jiang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2019.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the dynamic changes of immunoregulatory factors and tumor markers before and after chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom October 2015 to February 2018, 58 patients with chemotherapy AGC in our hospital were selected as gastric cancer group.According to the efficacy of chemotherapy they were divided into effective group, stable group and ineffective group.Meanwhile, 30 healthy persons were selected as normal group.The immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM), T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+ , CD4+ , CD8+ , CD4+ /CD8+ ) and related tumor markers (CEA, CA199, CA242) were compared before and after chemotherapy. \n \n \nResults \nThe levels of IgA((2.11±0.89) g/L), IgM((10.65±4.61) g/L), IgG((1.25±0.45) g/L), CD8+ ((28.12±3.56)%), CEA((40.33±16.24) μg/L), CA199((76.34±21.56) kU/L) and CA242((29.34±9.57)k U/L) in the gastric cancer group were significantly higher than those in the normal group IgA((0.93±0.36) g/L), IgM((6.46±3.59) g/L), IgG((0.65±0.32) g/L), CD8+ ((25.02±4.78)%), CEA((1.81±0.55) μg/L), CA199((7.51±2.67) kU/L), CA242((3.35±1.21) kU/L)(t=6.958, 3.600, 6.495, 3.435, 12.952, 17.370, 14.773, P<0.05), while CD3+ ((64.12±5.12)%), CD4+ ((34.12±4.10)%), CD4+ /CD8+ (1.09±0.28) were lower than the normal group (CD3+ (71.23±7.14)%, CD4+ (39.78±5.20)%, CD4+ /CD8+ (1.47±0.40))(t=5.376, 5.592, 5.192, P<0.05). The total effective rate of AGC patients in gastric cancer group was 79.31 % (46/58), and the ineffective rate was 20.69 % (12/58). IgA, IgG, IgM, and CD8+ in the effective group were significantly lower than those before chemotherapy (t=3.925, 3.745, 4.036, 2.661, P<0.05), while CD3+ , CD4+ , CD4+ /CD8+ were significantly higher than before chemotherapy (t=3.520, 3.077, 3.218, P<0.05). The subcellular level of protein and T lymphocytes was significantly better than that of stable group and ineffective group (P<0.05). The levels of tumor markers CEA, CA199 and CA242 in the effective group and stable group were significantly lower than those before chemotherapy (P<0.05), and significantly lower than the ineffective group (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe levels of immunoglobulins, T lymphocyte subsets and tumor markers in patients with AGC have significant changes after chemotherapy, and their levels can guide the efficacy of chemotherapy. \n \n \nKey words: \nAdvanced gastric cancer; Chemotherapy; Immunoglobulin; T lymphocyte subsets; Tumor markers","PeriodicalId":10365,"journal":{"name":"中国综合临床","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国综合临床","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2019.05.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To analyze the dynamic changes of immunoregulatory factors and tumor markers before and after chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
From October 2015 to February 2018, 58 patients with chemotherapy AGC in our hospital were selected as gastric cancer group.According to the efficacy of chemotherapy they were divided into effective group, stable group and ineffective group.Meanwhile, 30 healthy persons were selected as normal group.The immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM), T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+ , CD4+ , CD8+ , CD4+ /CD8+ ) and related tumor markers (CEA, CA199, CA242) were compared before and after chemotherapy.
Results
The levels of IgA((2.11±0.89) g/L), IgM((10.65±4.61) g/L), IgG((1.25±0.45) g/L), CD8+ ((28.12±3.56)%), CEA((40.33±16.24) μg/L), CA199((76.34±21.56) kU/L) and CA242((29.34±9.57)k U/L) in the gastric cancer group were significantly higher than those in the normal group IgA((0.93±0.36) g/L), IgM((6.46±3.59) g/L), IgG((0.65±0.32) g/L), CD8+ ((25.02±4.78)%), CEA((1.81±0.55) μg/L), CA199((7.51±2.67) kU/L), CA242((3.35±1.21) kU/L)(t=6.958, 3.600, 6.495, 3.435, 12.952, 17.370, 14.773, P<0.05), while CD3+ ((64.12±5.12)%), CD4+ ((34.12±4.10)%), CD4+ /CD8+ (1.09±0.28) were lower than the normal group (CD3+ (71.23±7.14)%, CD4+ (39.78±5.20)%, CD4+ /CD8+ (1.47±0.40))(t=5.376, 5.592, 5.192, P<0.05). The total effective rate of AGC patients in gastric cancer group was 79.31 % (46/58), and the ineffective rate was 20.69 % (12/58). IgA, IgG, IgM, and CD8+ in the effective group were significantly lower than those before chemotherapy (t=3.925, 3.745, 4.036, 2.661, P<0.05), while CD3+ , CD4+ , CD4+ /CD8+ were significantly higher than before chemotherapy (t=3.520, 3.077, 3.218, P<0.05). The subcellular level of protein and T lymphocytes was significantly better than that of stable group and ineffective group (P<0.05). The levels of tumor markers CEA, CA199 and CA242 in the effective group and stable group were significantly lower than those before chemotherapy (P<0.05), and significantly lower than the ineffective group (P<0.05).
Conclusion
The levels of immunoglobulins, T lymphocyte subsets and tumor markers in patients with AGC have significant changes after chemotherapy, and their levels can guide the efficacy of chemotherapy.
Key words:
Advanced gastric cancer; Chemotherapy; Immunoglobulin; T lymphocyte subsets; Tumor markers
期刊介绍:
Clinical Medicine of China is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association (CMA), which mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and commentaries in the field.
Clinical Medicine of China is a source journal of Peking University (2000 and 2004 editions), a core journal of Chinese science and technology, an academic journal of RCCSE China Core (Extended Edition), and has been published in Chemical Abstracts of the United States (CA), Abstracts Journal of Russia (AJ), Chinese Core Journals (Selection) Database, Chinese Science and Technology Materials Directory, Wanfang Database, China Academic Journal Database, JST Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (Japanese) (2018) and other databases.