Redesigning a Course Evaluation Instrument: Experience, Practical Guidance, and Lessons Learned

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal of Management Education Pub Date : 2023-04-11 DOI:10.1177/10525629231167296

A. Williamson, Irene Guannan Wang

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Course evaluation instruments (CEIs) are widespread, influential components of faculty professional development and evaluation processes. Given their importance to continuous instructional improvement and their weight in promotion, tenure, and other evaluation processes, it is critical that business schools and higher education institutions more broadly ensure a well-designed instrument. While the literature covering course evaluation instruments is extensive, coverage of the CEI revision process is virtually nonexistent. This article seeks to fill that gap, providing a case study of a successful CEI change process at an AACSB accredited business school. We offer practical recommendations for a revision process, including a sample timeline, revised instrument, and lessons learned from experience.

查看原文本刊更多论文

重新设计课程评估工具：经验、实践指导和经验教训

课程评估工具（CEI）是教师专业发展和评估过程中广泛而有影响力的组成部分。考虑到它们对持续教学改进的重要性，以及它们在晋升、任期和其他评估过程中的重要性，商学院和高等教育机构更广泛地确保一个精心设计的工具至关重要。虽然涵盖课程评估工具的文献非常广泛，但CEI修订过程的涵盖范围几乎不存在。本文试图填补这一空白，提供了一个在AACSB认证的商学院成功的CEI变更过程的案例研究。我们为修订过程提供了切实可行的建议，包括样本时间表、修订后的文书和经验教训。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Management Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Management Education (JME) encourages contributions that respond to important issues in management education. The overriding question that guides the journal’s double-blind peer review process is: Will this contribution have a significant impact on thinking and/or practice in management education? Contributions may be either conceptual or empirical in nature, and are welcomed from any topic area and any country so long as their primary focus is on learning and/or teaching issues in management or organization studies. Although our core areas of interest are organizational behavior and management, we are also interested in teaching and learning developments in related domains such as human resource management & labor relations, social issues in management, critical management studies, diversity, ethics, organizational development, production and operations, sustainability, etc. We are open to all approaches to scholarly inquiry that form the basis for high quality knowledge creation and dissemination within management teaching and learning.