Islam Nusantara in Political Contestation Identity Religion in Indonesia

Addin Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.21043/addin.v12i2.4774
Moh. Khamdan, W. Wiharyani
{"title":"Islam Nusantara in Political Contestation Identity Religion in Indonesia","authors":"Moh. Khamdan, W. Wiharyani","doi":"10.21043/addin.v12i2.4774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between the religion represented by Islam and the State that is represented by the democratic political system continues remain to be a problem. Ideological debates that Islamic law should be implemented and escorted through Islamic countries experiencing resistance against groups who argued that Islam is a substance that is in compliance with democracy. Religious ideology has often been a motivation to justify the struggle through the violence that has been done. Strengthening of violence in the name of religion is regarded as a form of struggle for bottomic beliefs and religious form in kaffah. Nationalism of Islamic religion Leaders by receiving Pancasila as the Indonesian ideology  its been a moderate wisdom that has taken to maintain the unity of Indonesia, while keeping the existence of religions living. The relationship of religion and the State by Islamic religion Leaders of Nahdhatul Ulama (NU) considered as a mutual-connection with maintaining Indonesian nationalism without discriminating treatment of religions, tribes, and inter-group relations is face Islam Nusantara in Indonesia. Politics as the source of radicalism muted by NU leaders with a fatwa that receiving of Pancasila both as the nations foundation and as a spirit of Islam Nusantara. This research uses psychology politics theory and the theory of social identity’s approach that analyzing potential radicalism in society.","PeriodicalId":31011,"journal":{"name":"Addin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v12i2.4774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The relationship between the religion represented by Islam and the State that is represented by the democratic political system continues remain to be a problem. Ideological debates that Islamic law should be implemented and escorted through Islamic countries experiencing resistance against groups who argued that Islam is a substance that is in compliance with democracy. Religious ideology has often been a motivation to justify the struggle through the violence that has been done. Strengthening of violence in the name of religion is regarded as a form of struggle for bottomic beliefs and religious form in kaffah. Nationalism of Islamic religion Leaders by receiving Pancasila as the Indonesian ideology  its been a moderate wisdom that has taken to maintain the unity of Indonesia, while keeping the existence of religions living. The relationship of religion and the State by Islamic religion Leaders of Nahdhatul Ulama (NU) considered as a mutual-connection with maintaining Indonesian nationalism without discriminating treatment of religions, tribes, and inter-group relations is face Islam Nusantara in Indonesia. Politics as the source of radicalism muted by NU leaders with a fatwa that receiving of Pancasila both as the nations foundation and as a spirit of Islam Nusantara. This research uses psychology politics theory and the theory of social identity’s approach that analyzing potential radicalism in society.
印尼政治斗争中的伊斯兰身份宗教
以伊斯兰教为代表的宗教与以民主政治制度为代表的国家之间的关系仍然是一个问题。关于伊斯兰法律应该在伊斯兰国家得到实施和保护的意识形态辩论,这些国家正在经历对那些认为伊斯兰是一种符合民主的物质的团体的抵抗。宗教意识形态往往是通过暴力为斗争辩护的动机。在卡法,以宗教名义加强暴力被视为一种争取底层信仰和宗教形式的斗争形式。伊斯兰宗教领袖的民族主义通过接受Pancasila作为印度尼西亚的意识形态,这是一种温和的智慧,它采取了维护印度尼西亚的统一,同时保持宗教的存在。Nahdatul Ulama(NU)伊斯兰宗教领袖的宗教与国家关系被认为是在不歧视宗教、部落和群体间关系的情况下维护印度尼西亚民族主义的相互联系,在印度尼西亚面临伊斯兰努桑塔拉。政治是激进主义的根源,NU领导人通过一项法特瓦将Pancasila视为国家基础和伊斯兰精神而予以压制。本研究运用心理政治理论和社会认同理论分析社会中潜在的激进主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信