Concurrent Validity of Dual-Task Walking Speed With CERAD-NP Assessment Battery in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Han suk Lee PT, PhD , Mansoo Ko PT, PhD , Hyung-Ji Kim MD
{"title":"Concurrent Validity of Dual-Task Walking Speed With CERAD-NP Assessment Battery in Community-Dwelling Older Adults","authors":"Han suk Lee PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Mansoo Ko PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Hyung-Ji Kim MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the concurrent validity of the dual-task walking speed assessments in older adults using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Neuro-Psychological (CERAD-NP) Assessment Battery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional design.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Welfare care centers, Senior complex centers, and Dementia prevention care centers.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 163 community-dwelling older adults (N=163) were recruited using consecutive sampling. Participants were composed of 65 older adults with cognitive decline and 98 without cognitive decline.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>This study assessed the concurrent validity between dual-task walking speed assessments and the Total II score of CERAD-NP using Spearman's rank order correlations. The effect of the dual-task walking speed assessments on the Total II score was further investigated through multiple linear regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a moderate and statically significant association between the Total II score and all 8 dual-task walking speed assessments (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). The Total II score was strongly associated with the dual tasks of walking on a straight path while counting backward and crossing over an obstacle (<em>r</em>=0.698, <em>r</em>=0.697, respectively; <em>P</em>&lt;.05). According to multiple linear regression, only the dual task of walking while counting backward was significantly associated with the Total II score (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The dual-task walking speed assessments, which involved walking and performing a secondary task such as counting backward or crossing an obstacle on a straight path, were highly indicative of cognitive decline. The combination of results from both tasks may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of cognitive decline compared with relying solely on a single-task assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000472/pdfft?md5=c666332dd70d5f9f93dd613b98882e68&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000472-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the concurrent validity of the dual-task walking speed assessments in older adults using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Neuro-Psychological (CERAD-NP) Assessment Battery.

Design

Cross-sectional design.

Setting

Welfare care centers, Senior complex centers, and Dementia prevention care centers.

Participants

A total of 163 community-dwelling older adults (N=163) were recruited using consecutive sampling. Participants were composed of 65 older adults with cognitive decline and 98 without cognitive decline.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

This study assessed the concurrent validity between dual-task walking speed assessments and the Total II score of CERAD-NP using Spearman's rank order correlations. The effect of the dual-task walking speed assessments on the Total II score was further investigated through multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

There was a moderate and statically significant association between the Total II score and all 8 dual-task walking speed assessments (P<.05). The Total II score was strongly associated with the dual tasks of walking on a straight path while counting backward and crossing over an obstacle (r=0.698, r=0.697, respectively; P<.05). According to multiple linear regression, only the dual task of walking while counting backward was significantly associated with the Total II score (P<.05).

Conclusion

The dual-task walking speed assessments, which involved walking and performing a secondary task such as counting backward or crossing an obstacle on a straight path, were highly indicative of cognitive decline. The combination of results from both tasks may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of cognitive decline compared with relying solely on a single-task assessment.

CERAD-NP双任务步行速度评估组在社区老年人中的并行有效性
目标探讨使用阿尔茨海默病神经心理学(CERAD-NP)评估电池对老年人进行双任务步行速度评估的并发有效性。设计横断面设计。研究地点福利护理中心、老年综合中心和痴呆预防护理中心。参与者采用连续抽样的方法共招募了163名社区老年人(N=163)。主要结果测量本研究使用斯皮尔曼秩序相关性评估了双任务步行速度评估与 CERAD-NP 总分 II 之间的并发有效性。通过多元线性回归分析进一步研究了双任务步行速度评估对 II 总分的影响。结果II 总分与所有 8 项双任务步行速度评估之间存在中度统计学意义(P< .05)。总分 II 与在直道上边走边倒数和越过障碍物这两项双任务之间的关系密切(分别为 r=0.698、r=0.697;P< .05)。根据多元线性回归,只有边倒数边行走的双重任务与总分 II 显著相关(P<.05)。与仅依靠单一任务评估相比,将这两项任务的结果结合起来,可以更全面地评估认知能力的下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信