Development of Burnout in Physical Therapist Students and Associated Factors: A Study During COVID-19

Allison L. Smith, J. Ellison, J. Bogardus, P. Gleeson
{"title":"Development of Burnout in Physical Therapist Students and Associated Factors: A Study During COVID-19","authors":"Allison L. Smith, J. Ellison, J. Bogardus, P. Gleeson","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Introduction. Burnout is a negative response to work-related stress and follows a developmental process that might begin during students' academic studies. Review of Literature. Numerous factors affect burnout in graduate students, and few published studies have assessed burnout in physical therapist students. Subjects. Participants included 1,340 Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students from DPT programs across the United States. Method. Students completed a Psychdata survey in fall 2020 that assessed burnout using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for Students (OLBI-S), resilience using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), perceived stress using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and additional questions regarding levels of support and the learning environment. Burnout levels for each year in a DPT program were determined using 2 one-way independent analysis of variances, 1 for each OLBI-S subscale. Cutoff scores to group students into the burnout and nonburnout groups were determined using quartiles. Logistic regression was used to identify factors that may have an influence on the development of burnout. Results. No significant difference was found in burnout scores among students in different years in a DPT program. Using cutoff scores, 35.4% of DPT students were in the burnout group. Factors found to be statistically significant in predicting burnout were satisfaction with the level of support from faculty, satisfaction with overall learning environment, CD-RISC score, and PSS score (χ2(4) = 266.827, P < .001). The final model explained 24.8% of the variance and correctly classified 72.1% of cases. Discussion and Conclusion. Students who have higher levels of perceived stress, lower levels of satisfaction with the level of support from faculty, and lower levels of satisfaction with their overall learning environment at DPT school may be more likely to develop burnout, while students who have higher levels of resilience may be less likely to develop burnout. This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and may not be generalizable to nonpandemic times.","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"36 1","pages":"210 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Introduction. Burnout is a negative response to work-related stress and follows a developmental process that might begin during students' academic studies. Review of Literature. Numerous factors affect burnout in graduate students, and few published studies have assessed burnout in physical therapist students. Subjects. Participants included 1,340 Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students from DPT programs across the United States. Method. Students completed a Psychdata survey in fall 2020 that assessed burnout using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for Students (OLBI-S), resilience using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), perceived stress using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and additional questions regarding levels of support and the learning environment. Burnout levels for each year in a DPT program were determined using 2 one-way independent analysis of variances, 1 for each OLBI-S subscale. Cutoff scores to group students into the burnout and nonburnout groups were determined using quartiles. Logistic regression was used to identify factors that may have an influence on the development of burnout. Results. No significant difference was found in burnout scores among students in different years in a DPT program. Using cutoff scores, 35.4% of DPT students were in the burnout group. Factors found to be statistically significant in predicting burnout were satisfaction with the level of support from faculty, satisfaction with overall learning environment, CD-RISC score, and PSS score (χ2(4) = 266.827, P < .001). The final model explained 24.8% of the variance and correctly classified 72.1% of cases. Discussion and Conclusion. Students who have higher levels of perceived stress, lower levels of satisfaction with the level of support from faculty, and lower levels of satisfaction with their overall learning environment at DPT school may be more likely to develop burnout, while students who have higher levels of resilience may be less likely to develop burnout. This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and may not be generalizable to nonpandemic times.
新冠肺炎期间物理治疗师学生倦怠的发展及其相关因素研究
文本中提供了补充数字内容。介绍倦怠是对与工作相关的压力的负面反应,它遵循着一个可能始于学生学业期间的发展过程。文献综述。许多因素影响研究生的倦怠,很少有发表的研究评估物理治疗师学生的倦怠。受试者。参与者包括1340名来自美国各地物理治疗项目的物理治疗博士(DPT)学生。方法学生们在2020年秋季完成了一项心理健康数据调查,该调查使用奥尔登堡学生倦怠量表(OLBI-S)评估了倦怠,使用康纳·戴维森复原力量表(CD-RISC)评估了复原力,使用感知压力量表(PSS)评估了感知压力,以及关于支持水平和学习环境的其他问题。DPT项目中每年的消耗水平使用2个单向独立方差分析来确定,每个OLBI-S分量表1个。使用四分位数确定将学生分为倦怠组和非倦怠组的截止分数。使用Logistic回归来确定可能影响倦怠发展的因素。后果在DPT项目中,不同年级学生的倦怠得分没有显著差异。使用截止分数,35.4%的DPT学生属于倦怠组。预测倦怠具有统计学意义的因素是对教师支持水平的满意度、对整体学习环境的满意度、CD-RISC评分和PSS评分(χ2(4)=266.827,P<.001)。最终模型解释了24.8%的方差,并正确分类了72.1%的病例。讨论和结论。在DPT学校,感知压力水平较高、对教师支持水平满意度较低、对整体学习环境满意度较低的学生可能更容易出现倦怠,而韧性水平较高的学生可能不太可能出现倦怠。这项研究是在新冠肺炎大流行期间进行的,可能无法推广到非大流行时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信