Intra-Tester and Inter-Tester Reliability of the Lachmeter When Measuring Knee Joint Laxity.

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/5583949
Mikkel Oxfeldt, Anton B Pedersen, Mette Hansen
{"title":"Intra-Tester and Inter-Tester Reliability of the Lachmeter When Measuring Knee Joint Laxity.","authors":"Mikkel Oxfeldt, Anton B Pedersen, Mette Hansen","doi":"10.1155/2023/5583949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knee injuries are common among all age groups, and clinical knee examination is essential for the prognosis, follow-up, and rehabilitation process. The Lachmeter is a newly developed digitized modification of the Rolimeter, making it easier and faster for the test personnel to read the test result. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of the Lachmeter when testing healthy and traumatic knees. 24 healthy participants and a smaller sample of six ACL patients were examined with the Lachmeter by two intermediate testers and re-examined on a second visit within 21 days. All measurements were performed using two different grip techniques: a Lachman grip and an anterior drawer grip. Intra- and inter-tester reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), Student's paired <i>t</i>-test, and Bland-Altman plots. The results showed in healthy subjects poor to good intra-tester reliability (ICC range: -0.28-0.87, SEM range: 0.33-1.14 mm, and SDC range: 0.91-3.17 mm) and inter-tester reliability (ICC range: 0.41-0.87, SEM range: 0.27-0.67 mm, and SDC range: 0.75-1.87 mm). In ACL patients, intra-tester reliability was moderate to excellent (ICC range: 0.53-0.94, SEM range: 0.14-0.88 mm, and SDC range: 0.38-2.44 mm), with the exception of one measurement (ICC: 0.26 95% CI [-3.43; 0.89]), whereas inter-tester reliability was overall good (ICC range: 0.61-0.89, SEM range: 0.29-0.71 mm, and SDC range: 0.79-1.97 mm). Reliability measures between grip techniques indicated that the Lachman grip was more reliable than the anterior drawer grip. In conclusion, the Lachmeter showed variation between reliability measures, ranging from poor to good in healthy subjects and moderate to excellent in ACL patients. Future studies are needed to validate the Lachmeter against a gold-standard knee laxity assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5583949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knee injuries are common among all age groups, and clinical knee examination is essential for the prognosis, follow-up, and rehabilitation process. The Lachmeter is a newly developed digitized modification of the Rolimeter, making it easier and faster for the test personnel to read the test result. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of the Lachmeter when testing healthy and traumatic knees. 24 healthy participants and a smaller sample of six ACL patients were examined with the Lachmeter by two intermediate testers and re-examined on a second visit within 21 days. All measurements were performed using two different grip techniques: a Lachman grip and an anterior drawer grip. Intra- and inter-tester reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), Student's paired t-test, and Bland-Altman plots. The results showed in healthy subjects poor to good intra-tester reliability (ICC range: -0.28-0.87, SEM range: 0.33-1.14 mm, and SDC range: 0.91-3.17 mm) and inter-tester reliability (ICC range: 0.41-0.87, SEM range: 0.27-0.67 mm, and SDC range: 0.75-1.87 mm). In ACL patients, intra-tester reliability was moderate to excellent (ICC range: 0.53-0.94, SEM range: 0.14-0.88 mm, and SDC range: 0.38-2.44 mm), with the exception of one measurement (ICC: 0.26 95% CI [-3.43; 0.89]), whereas inter-tester reliability was overall good (ICC range: 0.61-0.89, SEM range: 0.29-0.71 mm, and SDC range: 0.79-1.97 mm). Reliability measures between grip techniques indicated that the Lachman grip was more reliable than the anterior drawer grip. In conclusion, the Lachmeter showed variation between reliability measures, ranging from poor to good in healthy subjects and moderate to excellent in ACL patients. Future studies are needed to validate the Lachmeter against a gold-standard knee laxity assessment.

Lachmeter在测量膝关节松弛度时的内部和内部可靠性
膝关节损伤在所有年龄组中都很常见,临床膝关节检查对预后、随访和康复过程至关重要。Lachmeter是Rolimeter的一种新开发的数字化修改,使测试人员更容易、更快地读取测试结果。在本研究中,我们旨在评估Lachmeter在测试健康和创伤性膝盖时的测试者内和测试者间可靠性。24名健康参与者和6名ACL患者中的一小部分样本由两名中间测试人员使用Lachmeter进行了检查,并在21日内的第二次就诊中进行了重新检查 天。所有测量均使用两种不同的握持技术进行:Lachman握持和前抽屉握持。使用类内相关系数(ICC)、标准测量误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(SDC)、Student配对t检验和Bland–Altman图评估测试者内部和内部的可靠性。结果显示,在健康受试者中,测试者内部可靠性较差至良好(ICC范围:-0.28–0.87,SEM范围:0.33–1.14 mm,SDC范围:0.91–3.17 mm)和测试仪间可靠性(ICC范围:0.41–0.87,SEM范围:0.27–0.67 mm,SDC范围:0.75–1.87 mm)。在ACL患者中,测试者内部的可靠性为中等至优秀(ICC范围:0.53–0.94,SEM范围:0.14–0.88 mm,SDC范围:0.38–2.44 mm),但一次测量除外(ICC:0.26 95%CI[−3.43;0.89]),而测试仪间的可靠性总体良好(ICC范围:0.61–0.89,SEM范围:0.29–0.71 mm,SDC范围:0.79–1.97 mm)。抓握技术之间的可靠性测量表明,Lachman抓握比前抽屉抓握更可靠。总之,Lachmeter显示出不同的可靠性指标,健康受试者的可靠性从差到好,ACL患者的可靠性从中等到优秀。未来的研究需要根据金标准膝盖松弛度评估来验证Lachmeter。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信