{"title":"Working with multilingual aphasia: attitudes and practices among speech and language pathologists in Norway","authors":"M. Norvik, Marianne Lind, Bård Uri Jensen","doi":"10.1080/19313152.2021.2015935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The growing number of elderly multilingual speakers suffering from strokes and aphasia requires a change in the services of speech and language pathologists (SLPs), who will be serving culturally and linguistically diverse individuals to an increasing extent. Two American studies have shown that a majority of SLPs who work with multilingual adults in the US felt that their academic and clinical training had left them insufficiently prepared for working with multilingual persons with aphasia (MPWAs). This insecurity may have considerable negative consequences for MPWAs and their families. Little is known about the generalizability of these studies; hence the objective of the present study is to investigate whether the US situation is comparable to a European country with different demographics. A web-based questionnaire was administered to SLPs in Norway, examining multiple factors regarding work setting, professional training, clinical tools and procedures, and service delivery issues with MPWAs. Overall, the results are in line with Centeno’s, showing that SLPs make sensible decisions to serve MPWAs despite inadequate education programmes, shortcomings in clinical training, and limited clinical resources. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for professional education and the measures needed to minimize present shortcomings in service delivery to MPWAs.","PeriodicalId":46090,"journal":{"name":"International Multilingual Research Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"273 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Multilingual Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2021.2015935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
ABSTRACT The growing number of elderly multilingual speakers suffering from strokes and aphasia requires a change in the services of speech and language pathologists (SLPs), who will be serving culturally and linguistically diverse individuals to an increasing extent. Two American studies have shown that a majority of SLPs who work with multilingual adults in the US felt that their academic and clinical training had left them insufficiently prepared for working with multilingual persons with aphasia (MPWAs). This insecurity may have considerable negative consequences for MPWAs and their families. Little is known about the generalizability of these studies; hence the objective of the present study is to investigate whether the US situation is comparable to a European country with different demographics. A web-based questionnaire was administered to SLPs in Norway, examining multiple factors regarding work setting, professional training, clinical tools and procedures, and service delivery issues with MPWAs. Overall, the results are in line with Centeno’s, showing that SLPs make sensible decisions to serve MPWAs despite inadequate education programmes, shortcomings in clinical training, and limited clinical resources. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for professional education and the measures needed to minimize present shortcomings in service delivery to MPWAs.
期刊介绍:
The International Multilingual Research Journal (IMRJ) invites scholarly contributions with strong interdisciplinary perspectives to understand and promote bi/multilingualism, bi/multi-literacy, and linguistic democracy. The journal’s focus is on these topics as related to languages other than English as well as dialectal variations of English. It has three thematic emphases: the intersection of language and culture, the dialectics of the local and global, and comparative models within and across contexts. IMRJ is committed to promoting equity, access, and social justice in education, and to offering accessible research and policy analyses to better inform scholars, educators, students, and policy makers. IMRJ is particularly interested in scholarship grounded in interdisciplinary frameworks that offer insights from linguistics, applied linguistics, education, globalization and immigration studies, cultural psychology, linguistic and psychological anthropology, sociolinguistics, literacy studies, post-colonial studies, critical race theory, and critical theory and pedagogy. It seeks theoretical and empirical scholarship with implications for research, policy, and practice. Submissions of research articles based on quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods are encouraged. The journal includes book reviews and two occasional sections: Perspectives and Research Notes. Perspectives allows for informed debate and exchanges on current issues and hot topics related to bi/multilingualism, bi/multi-literacy, and linguistic democracy from research, practice, and policy perspectives. Research Notes are shorter submissions that provide updates on major research projects and trends in the field.