Selective Root Retreatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Q4 Dentistry
Mohamed Nagy, A. Ghobashy
{"title":"Selective Root Retreatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Mohamed Nagy, A. Ghobashy","doi":"10.5195/d3000.2022.339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjectives: Post-treatment apical periodontitis is an inflammatory disorder of peri-radicular tissues caused by either persistent or secondary intra-radicular infection . The present study compared the prognosis of cases treated with the “selective root retreatment”  concept to the traditional retreatment approach. Material and Methods: Forty patients complaining of failed root canal treatment having  a periapical lesion in one root were selected. The cases were randomly divided into two groups; group (S): selective root canal retreatment in which only the affected root was retreated and group (T): traditional root canal retreatment in which all canals were retreated. The peri-radicular condition was evaluated radiographically using the Periapical Index (PAI) for one year. The chi-square test statistical tests analyzed the outcome data. Results: At the baseline examination, There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the patients’ baseline mean periapical indices . After one year, we found that the mean periapical index declined without a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: The present study points to selective root retreatment as a successful “minimally invasive alternative” in cases of an independently diseased root. The remaining treated roots can be retained without intervention provided that they are confirmed: “healthy”. Clinical Relevance: Selective root retreatment is a promising conservative option in the treatment of failed endodontic cases with periapical pathosis related to an individual root.","PeriodicalId":37056,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry 3000","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry 3000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2022.339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractObjectives: Post-treatment apical periodontitis is an inflammatory disorder of peri-radicular tissues caused by either persistent or secondary intra-radicular infection . The present study compared the prognosis of cases treated with the “selective root retreatment”  concept to the traditional retreatment approach. Material and Methods: Forty patients complaining of failed root canal treatment having  a periapical lesion in one root were selected. The cases were randomly divided into two groups; group (S): selective root canal retreatment in which only the affected root was retreated and group (T): traditional root canal retreatment in which all canals were retreated. The peri-radicular condition was evaluated radiographically using the Periapical Index (PAI) for one year. The chi-square test statistical tests analyzed the outcome data. Results: At the baseline examination, There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the patients’ baseline mean periapical indices . After one year, we found that the mean periapical index declined without a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: The present study points to selective root retreatment as a successful “minimally invasive alternative” in cases of an independently diseased root. The remaining treated roots can be retained without intervention provided that they are confirmed: “healthy”. Clinical Relevance: Selective root retreatment is a promising conservative option in the treatment of failed endodontic cases with periapical pathosis related to an individual root.
选择性根治疗:一项随机临床试验
摘要目的:治疗后根尖周炎是一种由持续性或继发性根内感染引起的根周组织炎症性疾病。本研究比较了用“选择性根再治疗”概念和传统再治疗方法治疗的病例的预后。材料和方法:选择40名抱怨根管治疗失败的患者,其中一个根有根尖周病变。将病例随机分为两组;(S)组:选择性根管再治疗,其中仅受影响的根后退;(T)组:传统根管再处理,其中所有根管后退。使用根尖周指数(PAI)对根周状况进行一年的放射学评估。卡方检验统计检验对结果数据进行分析。结果:在基线检查时,两组患者的基线平均根尖周指数没有显著差异。一年后,我们发现平均根尖周指数下降,两组之间没有显著差异。结论:本研究指出,对于独立病变的根,选择性根再治疗是一种成功的“微创替代方案”。剩下的处理过的根可以在没有干预的情况下保留,前提是它们被确认为“健康”。临床相关性:选择性根再治疗是一种很有前途的保守选择,用于治疗与单个根相关的根尖周病变的失败牙髓病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry 3000
Dentistry 3000 Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信