The impact of deceased versus living donor graft status on kidney transplant outcomes: A Johannesburg single-center 48 years experience of 1685 patients.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000041
Tanya G Milwid, June Fabian, Ahmed Adam
{"title":"The impact of deceased versus living donor graft status on kidney transplant outcomes: A Johannesburg single-center 48 years experience of 1685 patients.","authors":"Tanya G Milwid, June Fabian, Ahmed Adam","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study is aimed to determine the impact of living donor (LD) versus deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation on renal graft survival and patient overall survival rates within Johannesburg, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective assessment was conducted of all 1685 adult first kidney-alone kidney transplant recipients transplanted between the years 1966 and 2013 in a single center. The patients were divided according to the source of the transplant: LD versus DD. Demographics and post-transplantation follow-up data were determined and tabulated. Graft and overall survival plots were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the recipients enrolled, 84.1% were DD recipients and 15.9% were LD recipients. Living donor recipient status was significantly associated with younger age <i>(p</i> ≤ 0.0001), a higher proportion of white, Asian, or mixed race compared to black race <i>(p</i> ≤ 000.1), a higher proportion of urologic etiology of disease <i>(p</i> = 0.015), and a lower proportion with hypertension <i>(p</i> ≤ 0.0001) as the cause of end stage kidney disease. Results showed a decreased risk of graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.66) and a decreased risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.61) among LD graft recipients as compared to DD graft recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In keeping with internationally reported trends, LD recipients continue to have enhanced patient and graft survival outcomes as compared to DD recipients within our local experience. This Johannesburg experience will serve as a foundation for future related studies in this region of the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":" ","pages":"336-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study is aimed to determine the impact of living donor (LD) versus deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation on renal graft survival and patient overall survival rates within Johannesburg, South Africa.

Materials and methods: A retrospective assessment was conducted of all 1685 adult first kidney-alone kidney transplant recipients transplanted between the years 1966 and 2013 in a single center. The patients were divided according to the source of the transplant: LD versus DD. Demographics and post-transplantation follow-up data were determined and tabulated. Graft and overall survival plots were generated.

Results: Of the recipients enrolled, 84.1% were DD recipients and 15.9% were LD recipients. Living donor recipient status was significantly associated with younger age (p ≤ 0.0001), a higher proportion of white, Asian, or mixed race compared to black race (p ≤ 000.1), a higher proportion of urologic etiology of disease (p = 0.015), and a lower proportion with hypertension (p ≤ 0.0001) as the cause of end stage kidney disease. Results showed a decreased risk of graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.66) and a decreased risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.61) among LD graft recipients as compared to DD graft recipients.

Conclusions: In keeping with internationally reported trends, LD recipients continue to have enhanced patient and graft survival outcomes as compared to DD recipients within our local experience. This Johannesburg experience will serve as a foundation for future related studies in this region of the world.

死亡与活体供者移植物状态对肾移植结果的影响
背景:本研究旨在确定南非约翰内斯堡活体供体(LD)与已故供体(DD)肾脏移植对移植肾存活和患者总体生存率的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析了1966年至2013年在同一中心接受首次单肾移植的1685例成人肾移植受者。根据移植来源将患者分为:LD和DD。统计数据和移植后随访数据被确定并制成表格。生成移植物和总体存活图。结果:在纳入的接受者中,84.1%为DD接受者,15.9%为LD接受者。活体供体受体状态与以下因素显著相关:年龄较小(p≤0.0001),白人、亚洲人或混血儿比例高于黑人(p≤000.1),泌尿系统病因比例较高(p = 0.015),高血压作为终末期肾病原因的比例较低(p≤0.0001)。结果显示移植物衰竭的风险降低(危险比,0.55;95%可信区间,0.45-0.66)和死亡风险降低(风险比,0.47;95%可信区间,0.36-0.61),LD受体与DD受体相比。结论:与国际上报道的趋势一致,在我们当地的经验中,与DD受体相比,LD受体继续具有更高的患者和移植物生存结果。这次约翰内斯堡的经历将成为今后在世界这一地区进行相关研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信