Effects of Muscle Energy Technique versus Shoulder Mobilization on Pain and Function in Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome – A pragmatic clinical trial

IF 0.4 Q4 REHABILITATION
Physioscience Pub Date : 2023-03-25 DOI:10.1055/a-2065-0337
Shahid Ishaq, Atif Dustgir, Zunaira Mehdi, Khalid Mahmood, Rukhsar Fatima, Muhammad Noman Tasawer
{"title":"Effects of Muscle Energy Technique versus Shoulder Mobilization on Pain and Function in Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome – A pragmatic clinical trial","authors":"Shahid Ishaq, Atif Dustgir, Zunaira Mehdi, Khalid Mahmood, Rukhsar Fatima, Muhammad Noman Tasawer","doi":"10.1055/a-2065-0337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  Subacromial pain syndrome is most leading cause of disability that includes the wide spectrum of disorders including subacromial tendinopathy, partial or full thickness tear of rotator cuff and subacromial bursitis. The manual therapy interventions for this condition are still debatable. Aim  To evaluate the comparative effects of muscle energy technique (MET) versus posterior shoulder mobilization with movement (MWM) on pain, function and shoulder range of motion in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Method  Patients diagnosed with subacromial pain syndrome were recruited in this pragmatic parallel double blinded randomized clinical trial. The sample was selected through non-probability convenient sampling technique. Forty patients out of 56 meeting the eligibility criteria were equally divided into two groups, MET group (n = 20) and MWM group (n = 20), through a randomization web service. Data were collected at baseline and after successful completion of a six week trial treatment. Pain severity was measured by using a numeric pain rating scale, shoulder disability was measured by using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and ranges of motion were measured by using goniometry. Data was analyzed through SPSS 24. Results  Outcome measures including pain, disability and shoulder range of motion were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) improved in both groups after the intervention. When comparing both groups, pain score was U = 82.0 (p ≤ 0.001) and disability score was t = –2.913 (p ≤ 0.006) favoring MET. Conclusion  Both MET and MWM were effective for symptomatic management in this sample of 40 patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. MET seems to show some superior effects as compared to MWM.","PeriodicalId":41765,"journal":{"name":"Physioscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physioscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2065-0337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  Subacromial pain syndrome is most leading cause of disability that includes the wide spectrum of disorders including subacromial tendinopathy, partial or full thickness tear of rotator cuff and subacromial bursitis. The manual therapy interventions for this condition are still debatable. Aim  To evaluate the comparative effects of muscle energy technique (MET) versus posterior shoulder mobilization with movement (MWM) on pain, function and shoulder range of motion in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Method  Patients diagnosed with subacromial pain syndrome were recruited in this pragmatic parallel double blinded randomized clinical trial. The sample was selected through non-probability convenient sampling technique. Forty patients out of 56 meeting the eligibility criteria were equally divided into two groups, MET group (n = 20) and MWM group (n = 20), through a randomization web service. Data were collected at baseline and after successful completion of a six week trial treatment. Pain severity was measured by using a numeric pain rating scale, shoulder disability was measured by using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and ranges of motion were measured by using goniometry. Data was analyzed through SPSS 24. Results  Outcome measures including pain, disability and shoulder range of motion were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) improved in both groups after the intervention. When comparing both groups, pain score was U = 82.0 (p ≤ 0.001) and disability score was t = –2.913 (p ≤ 0.006) favoring MET. Conclusion  Both MET and MWM were effective for symptomatic management in this sample of 40 patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. MET seems to show some superior effects as compared to MWM.
肌肉能量技术与肩部活动对肩峰下疼痛综合征患者疼痛和功能的影响——一项实用的临床试验
摘要背景 肩峰下疼痛综合征是导致残疾的最主要原因,包括肩峰下肌腱病、肩袖部分或全层撕裂和肩峰下滑囊炎等多种疾病。这种情况的手动治疗干预措施仍有争议。目标 评估肌肉能量技术(MET)与肩后运动动员术(MWM)对肩峰下疼痛综合征患者疼痛、功能和肩部活动范围的比较影响。方法 在这项实用的平行双盲随机临床试验中,招募了被诊断为肩峰下疼痛综合征的患者。样本采用非概率方便抽样技术进行选择。在符合资格标准的56名患者中,40名患者被平均分为两组,MET组(n = 20) MWM组(n = 20) ,通过随机化web服务。在基线和成功完成为期六周的试验治疗后收集数据。疼痛严重程度通过使用数字疼痛评定量表进行测量,肩部残疾通过使用肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)进行测量,运动范围通过使用测角仪进行测量。数据采用SPSS 24。后果 包括疼痛、残疾和肩部活动范围在内的结果指标显著(p ≤ 0.05)在干预后均有所改善。当比较两组时,疼痛评分为U = 82.0(p ≤ 0.001),残疾评分为t = –2.913(p ≤ 0.006)有利于MET。结论 MET和MWM对40例肩峰下撞击综合征患者的症状管理均有效。与MWM相比,MET似乎显示出一些优越的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physioscience
Physioscience REHABILITATION-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信