Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: Typical Antipsychotic Drugs Versus Atypical Antipsychotic Medications

Saeed Shoja Shafti
{"title":"Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: Typical Antipsychotic Drugs Versus Atypical Antipsychotic Medications","authors":"Saeed Shoja Shafti","doi":"10.31579/2642-9730/025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is an idiosyncratic reaction and a severe disorder caused by an adverse reaction to drugs with dopamine receptor- antagonist properties and is characterized by a tetrad of rigidity, fever, altered mental status, and autonomic instability. In the present assessment, typical or conventional antipsychotics have been contrasted with atypical antipsychotics with respect to recorded cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome among a sample of nonwestern psychiatric inpatients. Methods: For assessment, all the cases with a diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome during the last sixty-two months, after exclusion of other conceivable differential diagnoses, were incorporated in the current retrospective, record-based evaluation. The clinical diagnosis was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition. The valuation of independent variables was analyzed by ‘Compression of proportions. Statistical significance is defined as p value ≤0.05. Results: Amongst 19814 psychiatric inpatients, in the course of sixty-two months, eighteen cases received the diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. As said by the findings, neuroleptic malignant syndrome was meaningfully more frequent among males, in comparison with females, and it was importantly more prevalent among cases suffering from schizophrenia, in comparison with bipolar disorder. Also, the highest risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome was found in the age group of 30-39. In the current assessment, only one of the patients, who had received haloperidol, died due to aspiration pneumonia and respiratory failure, and the most prevalent symptom was fever, which was observable in one hundred percent of cases. In addition to a similar clinical profile, ‘Compression of proportions’ did not show any significant difference between the conventional (typical) antipsychotics versus the atypical antipsychotic medications with respect to the occurrence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Conclusion: As said by the findings, no significant difference was evident between the typical antipsychotic drugs versus the atypical antipsychotic medications, with respect to incidence and clinical profile of neuroleptic malignant syndrome.","PeriodicalId":93528,"journal":{"name":"Brain and neurological disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and neurological disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9730/025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is an idiosyncratic reaction and a severe disorder caused by an adverse reaction to drugs with dopamine receptor- antagonist properties and is characterized by a tetrad of rigidity, fever, altered mental status, and autonomic instability. In the present assessment, typical or conventional antipsychotics have been contrasted with atypical antipsychotics with respect to recorded cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome among a sample of nonwestern psychiatric inpatients. Methods: For assessment, all the cases with a diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome during the last sixty-two months, after exclusion of other conceivable differential diagnoses, were incorporated in the current retrospective, record-based evaluation. The clinical diagnosis was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition. The valuation of independent variables was analyzed by ‘Compression of proportions. Statistical significance is defined as p value ≤0.05. Results: Amongst 19814 psychiatric inpatients, in the course of sixty-two months, eighteen cases received the diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. As said by the findings, neuroleptic malignant syndrome was meaningfully more frequent among males, in comparison with females, and it was importantly more prevalent among cases suffering from schizophrenia, in comparison with bipolar disorder. Also, the highest risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome was found in the age group of 30-39. In the current assessment, only one of the patients, who had received haloperidol, died due to aspiration pneumonia and respiratory failure, and the most prevalent symptom was fever, which was observable in one hundred percent of cases. In addition to a similar clinical profile, ‘Compression of proportions’ did not show any significant difference between the conventional (typical) antipsychotics versus the atypical antipsychotic medications with respect to the occurrence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Conclusion: As said by the findings, no significant difference was evident between the typical antipsychotic drugs versus the atypical antipsychotic medications, with respect to incidence and clinical profile of neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
抗精神病恶性综合征:典型抗精神病药物与非典型抗精神病药
引言:抗精神病药恶性综合征是一种特殊反应和严重疾病,由对具有多巴胺受体拮抗剂特性的药物的不良反应引起,其特征是强直、发烧、精神状态改变和自主神经不稳定。在本评估中,在非西方精神病住院患者样本中记录的抗精神病药物恶性综合征病例方面,将典型或常规抗精神病药与非典型抗精神病剂进行了对比。方法:为了评估,在排除其他可能的鉴别诊断后,将过去六十二个月内诊断为神经抑制性恶性综合征的所有病例纳入当前的回顾性、基于记录的评估中。临床诊断依据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版。自变量的估值采用“比例压缩法”进行分析。统计显著性定义为p值≤0.05。结果:在19814例住院精神病患者中,在62个月的时间里,有18例被诊断为抗精神病药物恶性综合征。正如研究结果所说,与女性相比,抗精神病药物恶性综合征在男性中更为常见,重要的是,与双相情感障碍相比,它在精神分裂症患者中更为普遍。此外,30-39岁年龄组患抗精神病药物恶性综合征的风险最高。在目前的评估中,只有一名接受氟哌啶醇治疗的患者死于吸入性肺炎和呼吸衰竭,最常见的症状是发烧,百分之百的病例都可以观察到发烧。除了类似的临床特征外,“比例压缩”在抗精神病恶性综合征的发生方面,传统(典型)抗精神病药物与非典型抗精神病药之间没有任何显著差异。结论:正如研究结果所说,在抗精神病恶性综合征的发病率和临床特征方面,典型抗精神病药物与非典型抗精神病药之间没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信