Commentary on: developing a logic model for implementing citizen advocacy for adults with learning disabilities based on the experience of community inclusion centres for disabled people

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
M. Clifton, Steve Chapman
{"title":"Commentary on: developing a logic model for implementing citizen advocacy for adults with learning disabilities based on the experience of community inclusion centres for disabled people","authors":"M. Clifton, Steve Chapman","doi":"10.1108/tldr-04-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis commentary reflects on peer advocacy in relation to citizen advocacy in the context of the vital need for advocacy in all its different forms.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors reflect from the standpoint of developing peer advocacy in secure mental health settings as an organisation based on self-advocacy and co-production.\n\n\nFindings\nBy reflecting on peer advocacy and citizen advocacy side by side, the authors affirm both and all kinds of advocacy as being vital to people with learning disabilities living full and free lives as citizens.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors hope this commentary will enrich people’s understandings of the essential role of peer advocacy within different kinds of advocacy, and the need to enlarge the range of possibilities and choices open to a person.\n","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-04-2022-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This commentary reflects on peer advocacy in relation to citizen advocacy in the context of the vital need for advocacy in all its different forms. Design/methodology/approach The authors reflect from the standpoint of developing peer advocacy in secure mental health settings as an organisation based on self-advocacy and co-production. Findings By reflecting on peer advocacy and citizen advocacy side by side, the authors affirm both and all kinds of advocacy as being vital to people with learning disabilities living full and free lives as citizens. Originality/value The authors hope this commentary will enrich people’s understandings of the essential role of peer advocacy within different kinds of advocacy, and the need to enlarge the range of possibilities and choices open to a person.
评论:根据残疾人社区包容中心的经验,制定一个逻辑模型,为有学习障碍的成年人开展公民宣传
目的本评论反映了在各种不同形式的宣传的迫切需要的背景下,同行宣传与公民宣传的关系。设计/方法论/方法作者从在安全的心理健康环境中发展同伴倡导的角度进行反思,认为这是一个基于自我倡导和共同生产的组织,作者确认,这两种和各种各样的宣传对学习障碍者作为公民过上充实和自由的生活至关重要。原创性/价值作者希望这篇评论能丰富人们对同伴倡导在不同倡导中的重要作用的理解,以及扩大一个人的可能性和选择范围的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信