PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOCUSED ON STRENGTHENING TEACHERS’ COLLABORATION: THE CASE OF GEORGIA

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marika Kirvalidze, S. Lobzhanidze
{"title":"PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOCUSED ON STRENGTHENING TEACHERS’ COLLABORATION: THE CASE OF GEORGIA","authors":"Marika Kirvalidze, S. Lobzhanidze","doi":"10.33225/pec/23.81.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies confirm that professional development at the school base through the teachers’ collaboration is the most result-oriented outcome among the alternative ways of teachers’ professional development. One of the declared goals of the centralized system of teachers’ professional development and performance assessment operating in Georgia is to facilitate teachers’ collaboration. However, the contribution of the mentioned system in strengthening the teachers’ collaboration has not been studied so far. The purpose of the present research was to study the impact of the centralized system of teachers’ professional development and performance assessment on teachers’ collaboration at general educational institutions.\nThe issue was studied using the qualitative methods - focus group, interview, and content analysis of documents. Eight schools were selected for the study. Two focus groups were conducted with teachers and one interview was recorded with a school leader at each school. Furthermore, Interviews with six experts in the field were recorded. It was demonstrated that the centralized system of professional development and assessment focused on developmental assessment helps to strengthen the teachers’ professional relations. Activities closely related to the teacher's work, the correct attitude of the school leaders, teachers’ involvement in making decisions, the existence of preset goals, working schedule and space are important for collaborative relations. Existence of unified mechanisms for professional development, mistrust among colleagues, changes being constantly introduced to the education system, shortage of time were revealed as hindering factors for teacher collaboration.\nKeywords: qualitative research, school-based teachers’ professional development, teachers’ assessment, teachers’ collaboration","PeriodicalId":44900,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies confirm that professional development at the school base through the teachers’ collaboration is the most result-oriented outcome among the alternative ways of teachers’ professional development. One of the declared goals of the centralized system of teachers’ professional development and performance assessment operating in Georgia is to facilitate teachers’ collaboration. However, the contribution of the mentioned system in strengthening the teachers’ collaboration has not been studied so far. The purpose of the present research was to study the impact of the centralized system of teachers’ professional development and performance assessment on teachers’ collaboration at general educational institutions. The issue was studied using the qualitative methods - focus group, interview, and content analysis of documents. Eight schools were selected for the study. Two focus groups were conducted with teachers and one interview was recorded with a school leader at each school. Furthermore, Interviews with six experts in the field were recorded. It was demonstrated that the centralized system of professional development and assessment focused on developmental assessment helps to strengthen the teachers’ professional relations. Activities closely related to the teacher's work, the correct attitude of the school leaders, teachers’ involvement in making decisions, the existence of preset goals, working schedule and space are important for collaborative relations. Existence of unified mechanisms for professional development, mistrust among colleagues, changes being constantly introduced to the education system, shortage of time were revealed as hindering factors for teacher collaboration. Keywords: qualitative research, school-based teachers’ professional development, teachers’ assessment, teachers’ collaboration
注重加强教师协作的专业发展与绩效评估体系&以乔治亚州为例
研究证实,在教师专业发展的替代方式中,通过教师合作在学校基地进行专业发展是最注重结果的结果。格鲁吉亚实施的教师专业发展和绩效评估集中系统的既定目标之一是促进教师的合作。然而,上述制度在加强教师协作方面的贡献迄今尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是研究集中的教师专业发展和绩效评估系统对普通教育机构教师合作的影响。该问题采用了定性研究方法——焦点小组、访谈和文献内容分析。选择了八所学校进行研究。对教师进行了两次焦点小组讨论,并对每所学校的一名学校领导进行了一次访谈。此外,还记录了对该领域六名专家的访谈。研究表明,以发展性评价为核心的专业发展与评价集中体系有助于加强教师的专业关系。与教师工作密切相关的活动、学校领导的正确态度、教师参与决策、预设目标的存在、工作时间表和空间对协作关系很重要。专业发展统一机制的存在、同事之间的不信任、教育系统不断发生的变化、时间短缺都是阻碍教师合作的因素。关键词:质性研究、校本教师专业发展、教师评价、教师协作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Problems of Education in the 21st Century
Problems of Education in the 21st Century EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Problems of Education in the 21st Century is an international, periodical scientific journal publishing original research across the whole of education. The journal''s Editorial Board and staff are committed to building PEC into the leading scientific journal in its field by publishing articles of outstanding scientific quality that merit the attention and interest of the whole educational community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信