Determining the dimensionality and gender invariance of the MACE work-to-family enrichment scale using bifactor and approximate invariance tests
IF 1.5
Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
P. Schaap, E. Koekemoer
{"title":"Determining the dimensionality and gender invariance of the MACE work-to-family enrichment scale using bifactor and approximate invariance tests","authors":"P. Schaap, E. Koekemoer","doi":"10.4102/SAJIP.V47I0.1821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright: © 2021. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Introduction Over the past few decades, work–family research has been dominated by the conflict perspective (Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985) according to which the fulfilment of multiple work and family roles leads to experiences of conflict and stress and their concomitant detrimental effects (Eby, Casper, Lockwood, Bordeaux, & Brinley, 2005). The conflict perspective has also been the focus of most work–family studies conducted in Africa (Dubihlela & Dhurup, 2013; Koekemoer, Mostert, & Rothmann, 2010; Mostert, 2011; Opie & Henn, 2013). However, because of the growing attention given to positive psychology, international work–family researchers have come to realise that resources may be generated when multiple roles are occupied, resulting in positive outcomes for employees, organisations and families (Greenhaus & Powell, 2006; Voydanoff, 2002). As a result, international scholars, organisations and human resource practitioners increasingly focus on the positive aspects of the work–family interface. Nevertheless, the number of studies emphasising this positive interaction between work and family within the South African context is limited (De Klerk, Nel, Hill, & Koekemoer, 2013; Jaga, Bagraim, & Williams, 2013).","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJIP.V47I0.1821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Copyright: © 2021. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Introduction Over the past few decades, work–family research has been dominated by the conflict perspective (Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985) according to which the fulfilment of multiple work and family roles leads to experiences of conflict and stress and their concomitant detrimental effects (Eby, Casper, Lockwood, Bordeaux, & Brinley, 2005). The conflict perspective has also been the focus of most work–family studies conducted in Africa (Dubihlela & Dhurup, 2013; Koekemoer, Mostert, & Rothmann, 2010; Mostert, 2011; Opie & Henn, 2013). However, because of the growing attention given to positive psychology, international work–family researchers have come to realise that resources may be generated when multiple roles are occupied, resulting in positive outcomes for employees, organisations and families (Greenhaus & Powell, 2006; Voydanoff, 2002). As a result, international scholars, organisations and human resource practitioners increasingly focus on the positive aspects of the work–family interface. Nevertheless, the number of studies emphasising this positive interaction between work and family within the South African context is limited (De Klerk, Nel, Hill, & Koekemoer, 2013; Jaga, Bagraim, & Williams, 2013).
利用双因子和近似不变性检验确定MACE工作家庭富集量表的维度和性别不变性
版权所有:©2021。作者。被许可方:AOSIS。本作品获得知识共享署名许可。引言在过去的几十年里,工作-家庭研究一直以冲突视角为主(Greenhaus&Beutell,1985),根据该视角,履行多重工作和家庭角色会导致冲突和压力的经历及其伴随的有害影响(Eby,Casper,Lockwood,Bordeaux,&Brinley,2005)。冲突视角也是在非洲进行的大多数工作-家庭研究的焦点(Dubihlela和Dhurup,2013;Koekemor、Mostert和Rothmann,2010年;Mostert,2011年;Opie和Henn,2013年)。然而,由于对积极心理学的日益关注,国际工作-家庭研究人员已经意识到,当担任多个角色时,可能会产生资源,从而为员工、组织和家庭带来积极的结果(Greenhaus&Powell,2006;Voydanoff,2002年)。因此,国际学者、组织和人力资源从业者越来越关注工作与家庭互动的积极方面。然而,在南非背景下强调工作和家庭之间这种积极互动的研究数量有限(De Klerk,Nel,Hill,&Koekemor,2013;Jaga,Bagraim,&Williams,2013)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。