Is #Gender Affirmation Surgery Trending? An Analysis of Plastic Surgery Residency Social Media Content.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1089/trgh.2021.0215
Rose S Maisner, Kailash Kapadia, Ryan Berlin, Edward S Lee
{"title":"Is #Gender Affirmation Surgery Trending? An Analysis of Plastic Surgery Residency Social Media Content.","authors":"Rose S Maisner, Kailash Kapadia, Ryan Berlin, Edward S Lee","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2021.0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given rising demand for gender affirmation surgery (GAS), lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and others' (LGBTQ+) patient care, and sexual and gender minority (SGM) representation in plastic surgery, we sought to analyze integrated residency programs' posts for LGBTQ+ content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Programs were identified from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website. Accounts were searched for on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Posts uploaded through June 24, 2021 were analyzed. Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>- and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare content between programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 82 programs, 76 (92.7%), 31 (37.8%), and 30 (36.6%) have Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter accounts, respectively. Two hundred eighty-one (1.3%) posts displayed LGBTQ+ content, including educational (29.9%), research (17.4%), news (11.0%), resident interests (10.7%), pride/diversity (9.6%), posts to attract applicants/patients (7.5%), operative/clinic cases (6.8%), faculty spotlights (6.4%), and patient testimonials (1.1%). One hundred eighty-one (64.4%) posts described GAS overall, 42 (23.2%) described top, 32 (17.7%) described genital, and 32 (17.7%) described facial surgery. Instagram and Facebook have more LGBTQ+ content than Twitter (<i>p</i>≤0.037). Newly accredited programs have significantly more LGBTQ+ content on Facebook (<i>p</i>=0.036). Programs in the West, having more perceived prestige, or GAS fellowships tended to have more LGBTQ+ content.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite growing demand for GAS and thus training, 1% of content on plastic surgery residency social media accounts is LGBTQ+ related. Reasons for lack of representation require further investigation but may include (1) limited GAS and LGBTQ+ patient exposure during training or (2) lack of SGM inclusivity for residents, faculty, and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2021.0215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Given rising demand for gender affirmation surgery (GAS), lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and others' (LGBTQ+) patient care, and sexual and gender minority (SGM) representation in plastic surgery, we sought to analyze integrated residency programs' posts for LGBTQ+ content.

Methods: Programs were identified from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website. Accounts were searched for on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Posts uploaded through June 24, 2021 were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U- and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare content between programs.

Results: Of 82 programs, 76 (92.7%), 31 (37.8%), and 30 (36.6%) have Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter accounts, respectively. Two hundred eighty-one (1.3%) posts displayed LGBTQ+ content, including educational (29.9%), research (17.4%), news (11.0%), resident interests (10.7%), pride/diversity (9.6%), posts to attract applicants/patients (7.5%), operative/clinic cases (6.8%), faculty spotlights (6.4%), and patient testimonials (1.1%). One hundred eighty-one (64.4%) posts described GAS overall, 42 (23.2%) described top, 32 (17.7%) described genital, and 32 (17.7%) described facial surgery. Instagram and Facebook have more LGBTQ+ content than Twitter (p≤0.037). Newly accredited programs have significantly more LGBTQ+ content on Facebook (p=0.036). Programs in the West, having more perceived prestige, or GAS fellowships tended to have more LGBTQ+ content.

Conclusion: Despite growing demand for GAS and thus training, 1% of content on plastic surgery residency social media accounts is LGBTQ+ related. Reasons for lack of representation require further investigation but may include (1) limited GAS and LGBTQ+ patient exposure during training or (2) lack of SGM inclusivity for residents, faculty, and patients.

#性别确认手术正在流行吗?整形外科住院社交媒体内容分析
目的:鉴于对性别平权手术(GAS)、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者和其他人(LGBTQ+)患者护理以及整形外科中性和性别少数群体(SGM)代表的需求不断增加,我们试图分析综合住院医师培训项目中有关 LGBTQ+ 内容的帖子:方法:我们从美国整形外科学术委员会网站上确定了这些项目。在 Instagram、Facebook 和 Twitter 上搜索账户。对截至 2021 年 6 月 24 日上传的帖子进行了分析。使用 Mann-Whitney U- 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验来比较不同项目的内容:在 82 个节目中,分别有 76 个(92.7%)、31 个(37.8%)和 30 个(36.6%)拥有 Instagram、Facebook 和 Twitter 账户。281条(1.3%)帖子显示了LGBTQ+内容,包括教育(29.9%)、研究(17.4%)、新闻(11.0%)、住院医师兴趣(10.7%)、自豪感/多样性(9.6%)、吸引申请人/患者的帖子(7.5%)、手术/临床病例(6.8%)、教师聚焦(6.4%)和患者感言(1.1%)。有 181 篇(64.4%)帖子描述了 GAS 整体情况,42 篇(23.2%)描述了上部手术,32 篇(17.7%)描述了生殖器手术,32 篇(17.7%)描述了面部手术。Instagram 和 Facebook 上的 LGBTQ+ 内容多于 Twitter(P≤0.037)。新认证的项目在 Facebook 上的 LGBTQ+ 内容明显更多(p=0.036)。西方国家的项目、声望较高的项目或GAS奖学金项目往往有更多的LGBTQ+内容:结论:尽管对 GAS 以及培训的需求不断增长,但整形外科住院医师社交媒体账户中与 LGBTQ+ 相关的内容仅占 1%。缺乏代表性的原因需要进一步调查,但可能包括:(1)培训期间接触的 GAS 和 LGBTQ+ 患者有限;或(2)住院医师、教师和患者缺乏 SGM 包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信