UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF DANTE ALIGHIERI AND IMMANUEL KANT

Q4 Arts and Humanities
E. Mettini
{"title":"UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF DANTE ALIGHIERI AND IMMANUEL KANT","authors":"E. Mettini","doi":"10.19090/arhe.2021.35.49-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ideals of universal power able to manage and solve social and ethical (religious) questions as many ways to reach the highest wisdom, and consequently, fullest well-being of humankind to reach a perpetual peace are present throughout human history so that we can find these ideals in Plato’s Republic, in Aristotle’s Politeia and other works concerning the establishment of more or less utopic “states” and commonwealth since our days. In the present essay we shall scrutinize the universalistic vision of Italian thinker Dante Alighieri (1265–1321) and the cosmopolitan idea of German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). We decided to analyze the political philosophy of those thinkers on the following grounds: on one hand, D. Alighieri took as the basis of his rumination Roman Empire that having as solid basis of its universalistic ideology Right of every Roman citizen (lying on the observance of religious and civil obligations), and the so-called pax romana[1], a theoretical ground on which D. Alighieri would create a communitas a secular led by Reason commonwealth, which might have replaced the so-called humanitas (in Augustinian understanding of such idea); and, on the other hand, I. Kant tried to explain how human self-improvement under the right use of Reason (that we understand like ethical ruling principle of humankind) can be achieved to lead human beings from the state of nature (a semi-brutal one) to the state of reason, which would have as final end a perpetual peace in a universal republic. On those bases we shall try to detect common theoretical and ideal features between D. Alighieri and I. Kant’s vision, so to prove that universalistic power is not a despotic power, but a unifying power under ethical and spiritual principles of the whole humankind. \n  \n[1] The Pax Romana (Latin for \"Roman Peace\") is a roughly 200-year-long time span lasting from accession of Caesar Augustus, founder of the Empire (27 BC) to the death of Marcus Aurelius (180 AD) identified as a period and golden age of increased as well as sustained Roman imperialism, order, prosperous stability, hegemonial power and expansion, despite several revolts and internal political riots.","PeriodicalId":38340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy ARHE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy ARHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2021.35.49-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ideals of universal power able to manage and solve social and ethical (religious) questions as many ways to reach the highest wisdom, and consequently, fullest well-being of humankind to reach a perpetual peace are present throughout human history so that we can find these ideals in Plato’s Republic, in Aristotle’s Politeia and other works concerning the establishment of more or less utopic “states” and commonwealth since our days. In the present essay we shall scrutinize the universalistic vision of Italian thinker Dante Alighieri (1265–1321) and the cosmopolitan idea of German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). We decided to analyze the political philosophy of those thinkers on the following grounds: on one hand, D. Alighieri took as the basis of his rumination Roman Empire that having as solid basis of its universalistic ideology Right of every Roman citizen (lying on the observance of religious and civil obligations), and the so-called pax romana[1], a theoretical ground on which D. Alighieri would create a communitas a secular led by Reason commonwealth, which might have replaced the so-called humanitas (in Augustinian understanding of such idea); and, on the other hand, I. Kant tried to explain how human self-improvement under the right use of Reason (that we understand like ethical ruling principle of humankind) can be achieved to lead human beings from the state of nature (a semi-brutal one) to the state of reason, which would have as final end a perpetual peace in a universal republic. On those bases we shall try to detect common theoretical and ideal features between D. Alighieri and I. Kant’s vision, so to prove that universalistic power is not a despotic power, but a unifying power under ethical and spiritual principles of the whole humankind.   [1] The Pax Romana (Latin for "Roman Peace") is a roughly 200-year-long time span lasting from accession of Caesar Augustus, founder of the Empire (27 BC) to the death of Marcus Aurelius (180 AD) identified as a period and golden age of increased as well as sustained Roman imperialism, order, prosperous stability, hegemonial power and expansion, despite several revolts and internal political riots.
但丁和康德政治哲学中的普遍原则
普世力量的理想能够管理和解决社会和伦理(宗教)问题,以多种方式达到最高智慧,从而实现人类最大福祉,实现永久和平,这些理想贯穿于人类历史,因此我们可以在柏拉图的《理想国》中找到这些理想,在亚里士多德的《政治学》和其他关于自我们时代以来或多或少建立乌托邦式“国家”和联邦的著作中。在本文中,我们将仔细考察意大利思想家丹蒂·阿利吉耶里(1265-1321)的普世主义视野和德国哲学家伊曼纽尔·康德(1724-1804)的世界观。我们决定从以下几个方面来分析这些思想家的政治哲学:一方面,D.Alighieri将罗马帝国作为其沉思的基础,罗马帝国拥有其普世意识形态的坚实基础——每个罗马公民的权利(取决于对宗教和民事义务的遵守),以及所谓的pax romana[1],这是D。Alighieri将创建一个由理性联邦领导的世俗共同体,它可能取代了所谓的人道主义(在奥古斯丁对这种思想的理解中);另一方面,I·康德试图解释如何在理性(我们理解为人类的伦理统治原则)的正确使用下实现人类的自我完善,将人类从自然状态(半残酷的状态)引导到理性状态,这将最终导致一个普世共和国的永久和平。在此基础上,我们将试图发现阿利吉耶里和康德的共同的理论和理想特征,从而证明普世权力不是专制的权力,而是在全人类的伦理和精神原则下的统一权力。[1]罗马和平(拉丁语中“罗马和平”的意思)是从帝国创始人凯撒·奥古斯都登基(公元前27年)到马库斯·奥勒留去世(公元180年)大约200年的时间跨度,被认为是罗马帝国主义、秩序、繁荣稳定、霸权和扩张不断发展和持续的时期和黄金时代,尽管发生了几次叛乱和内部政治骚乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Philosophy ARHE
Journal of Philosophy ARHE Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信