Assessing the impact of de-escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department

IF 4.1 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Robin S. Engel, Nicholas Corsaro, Gabrielle T. Isaza, Hannah D. McManus
{"title":"Assessing the impact of de-escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department","authors":"Robin S. Engel,&nbsp;Nicholas Corsaro,&nbsp;Gabrielle T. Isaza,&nbsp;Hannah D. McManus","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research summary</h3>\n \n <p>Changing police use of force policies and training to incorporate de-escalation tactics is one of the most routinely recommended police reform measures. Despite widespread promotion and proliferation of de-escalation trainings, to date, no research has empirically demonstrated that these trainings reduce use of force in the field (Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., &amp; Herold, T. D., 2020). Therefore, it is unknown if de-escalation trainings actually reduce force, have no impact, or have unintended consequences that possibly increase injuries to officers or citizens. We collaborated with the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) in 2019 to evaluate the impact of the Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) de-escalation training developed by the Police Executive Research Forum. Using a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial research design, the panel regression results demonstrated statistically significant reductions in use of force incidents (−28.1%), citizen injuries (−26.3%), and officer injuries (−36.0%) in the post-training period. These significant reductions were larger than any changes in LMPD arrest patterns during the same period. Other possible time-based confounders were also considered; the combined analyses show robust, consistent, and immediate impacts on use of force counts after training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that agencies should continue to implement and evaluate de-escalation trainings and adopt other resiliency-based approaches to police training. To facilitate long-term changes in police behavior, a holistic approach is recommended that supports training tenets with complementary policies, supervisory oversight, managerial support, and community involvement in reform efforts. Finally, researchers must continue to support police executives willing to open their agencies for evaluation and oversight. Due to the LMPD's partnership with researchers, evidence now exists that de-escalation training can make police encounters with the public safer for all. Continuing to implement and evaluate innovative police trainings is our best opportunity for meaningful changes in policing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":"21 2","pages":"199-233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Research summary

Changing police use of force policies and training to incorporate de-escalation tactics is one of the most routinely recommended police reform measures. Despite widespread promotion and proliferation of de-escalation trainings, to date, no research has empirically demonstrated that these trainings reduce use of force in the field (Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., & Herold, T. D., 2020). Therefore, it is unknown if de-escalation trainings actually reduce force, have no impact, or have unintended consequences that possibly increase injuries to officers or citizens. We collaborated with the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) in 2019 to evaluate the impact of the Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) de-escalation training developed by the Police Executive Research Forum. Using a stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial research design, the panel regression results demonstrated statistically significant reductions in use of force incidents (−28.1%), citizen injuries (−26.3%), and officer injuries (−36.0%) in the post-training period. These significant reductions were larger than any changes in LMPD arrest patterns during the same period. Other possible time-based confounders were also considered; the combined analyses show robust, consistent, and immediate impacts on use of force counts after training.

Policy implications

Our findings suggest that agencies should continue to implement and evaluate de-escalation trainings and adopt other resiliency-based approaches to police training. To facilitate long-term changes in police behavior, a holistic approach is recommended that supports training tenets with complementary policies, supervisory oversight, managerial support, and community involvement in reform efforts. Finally, researchers must continue to support police executives willing to open their agencies for evaluation and oversight. Due to the LMPD's partnership with researchers, evidence now exists that de-escalation training can make police encounters with the public safer for all. Continuing to implement and evaluate innovative police trainings is our best opportunity for meaningful changes in policing.

评估降级训练对警察行为的影响:肯塔基州路易斯维尔市地铁警察局减少警察使用武力
改变警察使用武力的政策和培训,纳入缓和冲突的策略,是最常被建议的警察改革措施之一。尽管“冲突降级”训练得到了广泛推广和扩散,但迄今为止,还没有实证研究表明这些训练可以减少现场的武力使用(Engel, r.s., McManus, h.d., &赫罗尔德,t.d., 2020)。因此,不知道降级训练是否真的减少了武力,没有影响,或者产生可能增加警察或公民受伤的意外后果。2019年,我们与路易斯维尔大都会警察局(LMPD)合作,评估了警察行政研究论坛开发的综合通信、评估和战术(ICAT)降级培训的影响。采用楔形随机对照试验设计,面板回归结果显示,在培训后期间,使用武力事件(- 28.1%),公民伤害(- 26.3%)和警察伤害(- 36.0%)的统计学显著减少。这些显著的减少比同一时期LMPD逮捕模式的任何变化都要大。还考虑了其他可能的基于时间的混杂因素;综合分析表明,训练后对武力使用数量的影响是强大的、一致的和直接的。我们的研究结果表明,各机构应继续实施和评估降级培训,并采用其他基于弹性的警察培训方法。为了促进警察行为的长期变化,建议采用一种整体方法,支持培训原则,辅以配套政策、监督监督、管理支持和社区参与改革工作。最后,研究人员必须继续支持愿意开放他们的机构进行评估和监督的警察主管。由于伦敦警察局与研究人员的合作,现在有证据表明,降级训练可以使警察与公众的接触更加安全。继续实施和评估创新的警察培训是我们在警务方面进行有意义变革的最佳机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信