Plant Novices and Experts Differ in Their Value of Plant Type, Price, and Perceived Availability

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
B. Behe, M. Knuth, A. Rihn, C. Hall
{"title":"Plant Novices and Experts Differ in Their Value of Plant Type, Price, and Perceived Availability","authors":"B. Behe, M. Knuth, A. Rihn, C. Hall","doi":"10.24266/2573-5586-40.3.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Individuals with greater plant knowledge likely differ in purchase behavior compared to those with less plant knowledge. The goal of this study was to investigate consumer preferences for plants based on availability, price, and type, comparing plant experts with novices. Researchers employed an online survey and sub-contracted with a survey panel to recruit participants, yielding 1,010 complete and useful responses. Participants responded to a 10-item plant knowledge test adopted from Knuth et al. (2020). The number of correct answers to the knowledge test was used to categorize respondents into plant novice and expert groups (those intermediate in plant knowledge were excluded from analyses) and differences were explored. Experts had a slightly higher percentage of females compared to novices, were eight years older, and were slightly more educated compared to novices. Experts spent nearly twice as much on plants in 2021 as novices and bought more plants but from fewer plant categories. Plant type was the most important contributor to the expert's purchase decision, followed by price, and then availability. Novices valued more (had a higher mean utility score) plants that were moderately common when compared to experts, while experts valued rare plants more than novices.","PeriodicalId":15780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental horticulture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24266/2573-5586-40.3.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with greater plant knowledge likely differ in purchase behavior compared to those with less plant knowledge. The goal of this study was to investigate consumer preferences for plants based on availability, price, and type, comparing plant experts with novices. Researchers employed an online survey and sub-contracted with a survey panel to recruit participants, yielding 1,010 complete and useful responses. Participants responded to a 10-item plant knowledge test adopted from Knuth et al. (2020). The number of correct answers to the knowledge test was used to categorize respondents into plant novice and expert groups (those intermediate in plant knowledge were excluded from analyses) and differences were explored. Experts had a slightly higher percentage of females compared to novices, were eight years older, and were slightly more educated compared to novices. Experts spent nearly twice as much on plants in 2021 as novices and bought more plants but from fewer plant categories. Plant type was the most important contributor to the expert's purchase decision, followed by price, and then availability. Novices valued more (had a higher mean utility score) plants that were moderately common when compared to experts, while experts valued rare plants more than novices.
植物新手和专家在植物类型、价格和感知可用性方面的价值不同
与植物知识较少的人相比,植物知识较多的人在购买行为上可能有所不同。这项研究的目的是调查消费者根据可用性、价格和类型对植物的偏好,比较植物专家和新手。研究人员采用了一项在线调查,并与一个调查小组签订了分包合同,招募参与者,得到了1010份完整有用的回复。参与者对Knuth等人采用的10项植物知识测试做出了回应。(2020)。使用知识测试的正确答案数量将受访者分为植物新手组和专家组(那些植物知识中级的人被排除在分析之外),并探讨差异。与新手相比,专家的女性比例略高,比新手大八岁,受教育程度略高。2021年,专家们在植物上的花费几乎是新手的两倍,他们购买了更多的植物,但植物种类较少。植物类型是专家购买决定的最重要因素,其次是价格,然后是可用性。与专家相比,新手更重视(平均效用得分更高)中等常见的植物,而专家比新手更重视稀有植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental horticulture
Journal of environmental horticulture Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信