Knowledge-based dynamic capability: Concept mapping, usage, and taxonomy

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Sunali Bindra, Deepika Sharma, Rohit Bhardwaj, Sanjay Dhir, Saurabh Srivastava
{"title":"Knowledge-based dynamic capability: Concept mapping, usage, and taxonomy","authors":"Sunali Bindra,&nbsp;Deepika Sharma,&nbsp;Rohit Bhardwaj,&nbsp;Sanjay Dhir,&nbsp;Saurabh Srivastava","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge-based dynamic capability (KBDC) is a firm's ability to acquire, create, and combine knowledge to identify and exploit opportunities while addressing the dynamics of environmental changes. Based on a systematic review and analysis of the extant literature related to KBDC from 1959–2020, we aim to trace significant theories, contexts, characteristics, and methodologies (TCCM) and their inter-relationships to present a holistic view of the KBDCs research. In particular, the study attempts to address the issues inherent in organizing, designing, and executing KBDCs towards the attainment of the firm's strategic and organizational objectives. The study uses a structured methodological approach for conducting a systematic literature review to determine the existing contributions and by proposing the frameworks for future research. By conducting TCCM and bibliometric analysis of the existing KBDCs literature, the study provides comprehensive networks, significant countries, eminent authors, prominent theories, context, characteristics, and methodologies in this field. The analysis, therefore, addresses the managerial concerns over the entire spectrum of knowledge-based entities and bridges the gaps, such as application bias in large organizations, developed nations, and single-level analysis by exploring potential relationships regarding KBDC. Overall, the study provides the logical concept mapping, usage, and taxonomy contributing towards the strengthening of KBDC. In addition, the study also presents areas in which research has made the most progress as well as those in which gaps and unsolved tensions persist. The epistemological exploration traces the significant contributions for determining the future research scope.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"65-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Knowledge-based dynamic capability (KBDC) is a firm's ability to acquire, create, and combine knowledge to identify and exploit opportunities while addressing the dynamics of environmental changes. Based on a systematic review and analysis of the extant literature related to KBDC from 1959–2020, we aim to trace significant theories, contexts, characteristics, and methodologies (TCCM) and their inter-relationships to present a holistic view of the KBDCs research. In particular, the study attempts to address the issues inherent in organizing, designing, and executing KBDCs towards the attainment of the firm's strategic and organizational objectives. The study uses a structured methodological approach for conducting a systematic literature review to determine the existing contributions and by proposing the frameworks for future research. By conducting TCCM and bibliometric analysis of the existing KBDCs literature, the study provides comprehensive networks, significant countries, eminent authors, prominent theories, context, characteristics, and methodologies in this field. The analysis, therefore, addresses the managerial concerns over the entire spectrum of knowledge-based entities and bridges the gaps, such as application bias in large organizations, developed nations, and single-level analysis by exploring potential relationships regarding KBDC. Overall, the study provides the logical concept mapping, usage, and taxonomy contributing towards the strengthening of KBDC. In addition, the study also presents areas in which research has made the most progress as well as those in which gaps and unsolved tensions persist. The epistemological exploration traces the significant contributions for determining the future research scope.

基于知识的动态能力:概念映射、使用和分类
基于知识的动态能力(KBDC)是企业在应对环境动态变化的同时获取、创造和组合知识以识别和利用机会的能力。在系统回顾和分析1959-2020年与KBDC相关的现有文献的基础上,我们旨在追溯重要的理论、背景、特征和方法(TCCM)及其相互关系,以呈现KBDC研究的整体观点。特别是,该研究试图解决组织、设计和执行kbdc以实现公司战略和组织目标的内在问题。本研究采用结构化的方法学方法进行系统的文献综述,以确定现有的贡献,并为未来的研究提出框架。通过对现有的kbdc文献进行TCCM和文献计量学分析,本研究提供了该领域的综合网络、重要国家、著名作者、突出理论、背景、特征和方法。因此,该分析解决了管理人员对整个知识型实体的关注,并通过探索有关KBDC的潜在关系来弥合差距,例如大型组织、发达国家的应用偏见和单层次分析。总体而言,该研究提供了有助于加强KBDC的逻辑概念映射、使用和分类。此外,该研究还提出了研究取得最大进展的领域以及仍然存在差距和未解决的紧张关系的领域。认识论的探索追溯了确定未来研究范围的重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信