Graduate certificate in local development planning, land use management and disaster risk management: a knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) evaluation

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
J. Sarmiento, Catalina Sarmiento, Gabriela Hoberman, Meenakshi Chabba
{"title":"Graduate certificate in local development planning, land use management and disaster risk management: a knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) evaluation","authors":"J. Sarmiento, Catalina Sarmiento, Gabriela Hoberman, Meenakshi Chabba","doi":"10.1108/DPM-02-2021-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to assess knowledge retention of the graduates of the online graduate certificate on local development planning, land use management and disaster risk management (PDLOTGR, the abbreviation of the certificate's Spanish title). The certificate was offered to practitioners and faculty members of Latin American countries since 2016.Design/methodology/approachThe authors reviewed the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) method to develop a specific approach, which included the preparation of a KAP survey, a composite KAP index and three sub-indices. The survey targeted two groups: (1) experimental group, composed of the certificate's 76 graduates, and (2) control group, comprised of 25 certificate's candidates, who had not yet undergone the training/intervention. The statistical analysis included a one-way multivariate analysis of variance to compare the mean scores on the KAP index and sub-indices for individuals in the experimental and control groups.FindingsThe study results showed significant differences in the knowledge sub-index between those who had completed the PDLOTGR training and those who had not, while the attitudes and practices sub-indices did not show significant differences. When using the KAP index, a statistically significant difference was also observed between the two groups.Originality/valuePerceived knowledge assessment offers an acceptable and non-intimidating option for evaluating continuing education and professional development programs associated to disaster risk. It is particularly helpful in determining whether an intervention or program has a lasting impact. It is not, however, a substitute for direct knowledge assessment, and the use of other methods to evaluate the performance of a capacity building program's graduates.","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2021-0034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to assess knowledge retention of the graduates of the online graduate certificate on local development planning, land use management and disaster risk management (PDLOTGR, the abbreviation of the certificate's Spanish title). The certificate was offered to practitioners and faculty members of Latin American countries since 2016.Design/methodology/approachThe authors reviewed the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) method to develop a specific approach, which included the preparation of a KAP survey, a composite KAP index and three sub-indices. The survey targeted two groups: (1) experimental group, composed of the certificate's 76 graduates, and (2) control group, comprised of 25 certificate's candidates, who had not yet undergone the training/intervention. The statistical analysis included a one-way multivariate analysis of variance to compare the mean scores on the KAP index and sub-indices for individuals in the experimental and control groups.FindingsThe study results showed significant differences in the knowledge sub-index between those who had completed the PDLOTGR training and those who had not, while the attitudes and practices sub-indices did not show significant differences. When using the KAP index, a statistically significant difference was also observed between the two groups.Originality/valuePerceived knowledge assessment offers an acceptable and non-intimidating option for evaluating continuing education and professional development programs associated to disaster risk. It is particularly helpful in determining whether an intervention or program has a lasting impact. It is not, however, a substitute for direct knowledge assessment, and the use of other methods to evaluate the performance of a capacity building program's graduates.
本地发展规划、土地使用管理和灾害风险管理研究生证书:知识、态度和实践(KAP)评估
目的本研究旨在评估在线研究生证书(PDLOTGR,证书西班牙语名称的缩写)毕业生对当地发展规划、土地利用管理和灾害风险管理的知识保留情况。该证书自2016年起提供给拉丁美洲国家的从业者和教员。设计/方法/方法作者回顾了知识、态度和实践(KAP)方法,以制定一种具体的方法,其中包括准备一项KAP调查、一项综合KAP指数和三个子指数。该调查针对两组:(1)实验组,由76名证书毕业生组成,(2)对照组,由25名证书候选人组成,他们尚未接受培训/干预。统计分析包括单向多变量方差分析,以比较实验组和对照组个体的KAP指数和子指数的平均得分。研究结果显示,完成PDLOTGR培训的人和未完成PDLOTGR-培训的人在知识子指数上存在显著差异,而态度和实践子指数没有显示出显著差异。当使用KAP指数时,两组之间也观察到统计学上的显著差异。原创性/价值感知知识评估为评估与灾害风险相关的继续教育和专业发展计划提供了一个可接受且不具威胁性的选择。它特别有助于确定干预或计划是否具有持久影响。然而,它不能代替直接的知识评估,也不能代替使用其他方法来评估能力建设项目毕业生的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信