{"title":"Effectiveness of Phonological Awareness Stimulation in Preschoolers – A Systematic Review","authors":"Marta Sá, M. Lousada","doi":"10.5354/0719-4692.2022.64161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nPhonological awareness is a strong predictor of reading and writing skills development. Several programs have been developed and tested for the stimulation of phonological awareness, but the degree of variation among them makes it difficult to compare the different methods. A synthesis of the literature on phonological awareness stimulation programs is needed to examine the effectiveness of PA programs while considering the variability that exists between the methodologies used. This systematic review aimed to 1) synthesize the literature on PA stimulation programs in typically developing children; 2) examine the effectiveness of PA programs; 3) critically appraise the methodology of PA stimulation programs. Central, Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge were used to conduct an extensive literature search. A total of 10 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present study. Results showed that, in general, the phonological awareness stimulation programs carried out in the analyzed research were effective. However, the quality of the methodology varied significantly across studies, showing in some cases a lack of detail in the inclusion criteria, limited training of the professionals who carried out the PA programs, an inconsistency in parent involvement, and a lack of follow-up. Guidelines for future research are discussed to enhance the methodological quality of this line of research and reduce the risk of bias.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":30716,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2022.64161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Phonological awareness is a strong predictor of reading and writing skills development. Several programs have been developed and tested for the stimulation of phonological awareness, but the degree of variation among them makes it difficult to compare the different methods. A synthesis of the literature on phonological awareness stimulation programs is needed to examine the effectiveness of PA programs while considering the variability that exists between the methodologies used. This systematic review aimed to 1) synthesize the literature on PA stimulation programs in typically developing children; 2) examine the effectiveness of PA programs; 3) critically appraise the methodology of PA stimulation programs. Central, Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge were used to conduct an extensive literature search. A total of 10 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present study. Results showed that, in general, the phonological awareness stimulation programs carried out in the analyzed research were effective. However, the quality of the methodology varied significantly across studies, showing in some cases a lack of detail in the inclusion criteria, limited training of the professionals who carried out the PA programs, an inconsistency in parent involvement, and a lack of follow-up. Guidelines for future research are discussed to enhance the methodological quality of this line of research and reduce the risk of bias.
语音意识是阅读和写作技能发展的有力预测因素。已经开发并测试了几种刺激语音意识的程序,但它们之间的差异程度使得很难比较不同的方法。需要对语音意识刺激程序的文献进行综合,以检查PA程序的有效性,同时考虑所用方法之间存在的可变性。本系统综述旨在1)综合关于典型发育中儿童PA刺激方案的文献;2) 检查PA计划的有效性;3) 批判性地评价PA刺激方案的方法。Central、Medline、Pubmed、Scopus和Web of Knowledge被用于进行广泛的文献检索。共有10篇文章符合资格标准,并被纳入本研究。结果表明,总体而言,在所分析的研究中进行的语音意识刺激程序是有效的。然而,不同研究的方法质量差异很大,在某些情况下,纳入标准缺乏细节,实施PA项目的专业人员培训有限,家长参与不一致,缺乏后续行动。讨论了未来研究的指导方针,以提高这一研究领域的方法论质量并降低偏见的风险。