Control of separation shock unsteadiness in an incident-shock-induced interaction

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
C. Manisankar, S. B. Verma
{"title":"Control of separation shock unsteadiness in an incident-shock-induced interaction","authors":"C. Manisankar,&nbsp;S. B. Verma","doi":"10.1007/s00193-023-01129-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Separation shock unsteadiness in an incident-shock-induced interaction with and without control is evaluated in a Mach 2.05 flow using a <span>\\(14^{\\circ }\\)</span> shock generator. An array of mechanical vortex generators (MVGs) in the form of rectangular vanes (MVG1), ramp vanes (MVG2), and a delta ramp (MVG3) is placed <span>\\(14\\delta \\)</span> upstream of the interaction region (<span>\\(\\delta =5.2\\,{\\textrm{mm}}\\)</span> being the local boundary layer thickness at the interaction). Among all the devices tested, MVG1 shows a maximum reduction of the separation length (about 28% relative to the no-control case). The spectra at separation also show a shift in the dominant frequency from 220 Hz without control to 539 Hz with MVG1. Interestingly, the peak rms (root mean square) value is seen to occur with control at much larger intermittency values (<span>\\(\\upgamma _{\\upsigma ,{\\textrm{max}}}=0.92\\)</span> for MVG1) in contrast to the no-control case in which it occurs at <span>\\(\\upgamma _{\\upsigma ,{\\textrm{max}}}=0.5\\)</span> as reported so far. The auto-correlation at the separation and reattachment shock locations indicates the presence of relatively small-scale structures with control as compared to the case without control. Out of all the control cases tested, MVG1 exhibits better separation control with a relatively lower unsteadiness level.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-023-01129-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Separation shock unsteadiness in an incident-shock-induced interaction with and without control is evaluated in a Mach 2.05 flow using a \(14^{\circ }\) shock generator. An array of mechanical vortex generators (MVGs) in the form of rectangular vanes (MVG1), ramp vanes (MVG2), and a delta ramp (MVG3) is placed \(14\delta \) upstream of the interaction region (\(\delta =5.2\,{\textrm{mm}}\) being the local boundary layer thickness at the interaction). Among all the devices tested, MVG1 shows a maximum reduction of the separation length (about 28% relative to the no-control case). The spectra at separation also show a shift in the dominant frequency from 220 Hz without control to 539 Hz with MVG1. Interestingly, the peak rms (root mean square) value is seen to occur with control at much larger intermittency values (\(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.92\) for MVG1) in contrast to the no-control case in which it occurs at \(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.5\) as reported so far. The auto-correlation at the separation and reattachment shock locations indicates the presence of relatively small-scale structures with control as compared to the case without control. Out of all the control cases tested, MVG1 exhibits better separation control with a relatively lower unsteadiness level.

Abstract Image

碰撞-冲击相互作用中分离冲击非定常的控制
在马赫数为2.05的流动中,利用\(14^{\circ }\)激波发生器对有控制和无控制的入射激波相互作用中的分离激波非定常进行了评估。一组机械涡发生器(mvg)以矩形叶片(MVG1)、斜坡叶片(MVG2)和三角洲斜坡(MVG3)的形式放置在相互作用区域的上游\(14\delta \) (\(\delta =5.2\,{\textrm{mm}}\)为相互作用处的局部边界层厚度)。在所有测试的器件中,MVG1显示出最大的分离长度减少(约28% relative to the no-control case). The spectra at separation also show a shift in the dominant frequency from 220 Hz without control to 539 Hz with MVG1. Interestingly, the peak rms (root mean square) value is seen to occur with control at much larger intermittency values (\(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.92\) for MVG1) in contrast to the no-control case in which it occurs at \(\upgamma _{\upsigma ,{\textrm{max}}}=0.5\) as reported so far. The auto-correlation at the separation and reattachment shock locations indicates the presence of relatively small-scale structures with control as compared to the case without control. Out of all the control cases tested, MVG1 exhibits better separation control with a relatively lower unsteadiness level.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shock Waves
Shock Waves 物理-力学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
17.4 months
期刊介绍: Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization. The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine. Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community. The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信