Best Practices for the Analytic Phase of Anaerobic Bacteriology

Q3 Medicine
Allison R. Eberly , Jamie L. Elvert , Audrey N. Schuetz
{"title":"Best Practices for the Analytic Phase of Anaerobic Bacteriology","authors":"Allison R. Eberly ,&nbsp;Jamie L. Elvert ,&nbsp;Audrey N. Schuetz","doi":"10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2022.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>The analytic process for identification of anaerobic bacteria involves direct specimen </span>Gram stains<span> and workup of growth in culture. Direct Gram stains help to develop the initial differential, aiding in guiding both the extent of laboratory workup and clinician decision making for patient management. Workup of anaerobic growth should involve an aerotolerance test to assess aerobic growth and to compare growth rates in anaerobic versus aerobic environments. While matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has become a routine means of </span></span>anaerobe<span><span> identification for many clinical laboratories, spot biochemical tests, such as indole and </span>catalase<span>, should be available in every laboratory that identifies anaerobes. If MALDI-TOF MS and biochemical methods are unsuccessful at providing an identification, 16S rRNA gene PCR and/or sequencing may be performed if the information impacts clinical care. The extent of culture workup to the level of presumptive identification versus definitive identification depends upon several factors, including the specimen source, direct Gram stain results, and the presence or absence of mixed </span></span></span>microbiota<span>. In addition to discussing the current best practices for anaerobic culture workup, commonly encountered anaerobic organism Gram stains and culture growth are detailed.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39211,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Newsletter","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196439922000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analytic process for identification of anaerobic bacteria involves direct specimen Gram stains and workup of growth in culture. Direct Gram stains help to develop the initial differential, aiding in guiding both the extent of laboratory workup and clinician decision making for patient management. Workup of anaerobic growth should involve an aerotolerance test to assess aerobic growth and to compare growth rates in anaerobic versus aerobic environments. While matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has become a routine means of anaerobe identification for many clinical laboratories, spot biochemical tests, such as indole and catalase, should be available in every laboratory that identifies anaerobes. If MALDI-TOF MS and biochemical methods are unsuccessful at providing an identification, 16S rRNA gene PCR and/or sequencing may be performed if the information impacts clinical care. The extent of culture workup to the level of presumptive identification versus definitive identification depends upon several factors, including the specimen source, direct Gram stain results, and the presence or absence of mixed microbiota. In addition to discussing the current best practices for anaerobic culture workup, commonly encountered anaerobic organism Gram stains and culture growth are detailed.

厌氧细菌学分析阶段的最佳实践
厌氧细菌鉴定的分析过程包括直接标本革兰氏染色和培养物生长的检查。直接革兰氏染色有助于初步鉴别,有助于指导实验室检查的范围和临床医生对患者管理的决策。厌氧生长的检查应包括空气耐受性试验,以评估有氧生长,并比较厌氧和有氧环境下的生长速率。虽然基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法(MALDI-TOF MS)已经成为许多临床实验室鉴定厌氧菌的常规手段,但每个实验室都应该使用吲哚和过氧化氢酶等现场生化试验来鉴定厌氧菌。如果MALDI-TOF MS和生化方法无法提供鉴定,如果信息影响临床护理,可以进行16S rRNA基因PCR和/或测序。培养工作的程度取决于几个因素,包括标本来源、直接革兰氏染色结果和混合微生物群的存在或不存在。除了讨论目前厌氧培养工作的最佳实践外,还详细介绍了常见的厌氧生物革兰氏染色和培养生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
Clinical Microbiology Newsletter Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Highly respected for its ability to keep pace with advances in this fast moving field, Clinical Microbiology Newsletter has quickly become a “benchmark” for anyone in the lab. Twice a month the newsletter reports on changes that affect your work, ranging from articles on new diagnostic techniques, to surveys of how readers handle blood cultures, to editorials questioning common procedures and suggesting new ones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信