Practice Insight: Court-connected mediation in Jordan—Considerations for choosing a mediator

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Conflict Resolution Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1002/crq.21383

Bakr Abdel Fattah Al Serhan, Wesam Faisal Al Shawawreh, Pauline Collins

引用次数: 0

Abstract

A model of court-connected mediation following Western practice was adopted in Jordan in 2003. Its success has been limited. This practice insight addresses the current mediation legislation in Jordan in relation to civil and commercial disputes. The law allows the parties three options in choosing a mediator, one being a judge mediator. This raises important considerations for parties when they are choosing a mediator. The practice insight addresses these considerations with a view to improving party awareness when exercising their choice of mediator. It also takes the opportunity to suggest legislative changes to improve the uptake of mediation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

实践洞察:约旦法院连接调解-选择调解员的考虑因素

2003年，约旦采用了一种仿效西方做法的与法院有关的调解模式。它的成功是有限的。这一实践见解涉及约旦目前与民事和商业纠纷有关的调解立法。法律允许当事人在选择调解人时有三种选择，一种是法官调解人。这引起了当事人在选择调解员时的重要考虑。实践洞察解决了这些考虑因素，以期提高当事人在选择调解员时的意识。委员会还借此机会提出立法改革建议，以提高对调解的接受程度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Conflict Resolution Quarterly Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes quality scholarship on relationships between theory, research, and practice in the conflict management and dispute resolution field to promote more effective professional applications. A defining focus of the journal is the relationships among theory, research, and practice. Articles address the implications of theory for practice and research directions, how research can better inform practice, and how research can contribute to theory development with important implications for practice. Articles also focus on all aspects of the conflict resolution process and context with primary focus on the behavior, role, and impact of third parties in effectively handling conflict.