Effect of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor versus Valsartan on Cardiac Status in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Rangpur Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh

S. Ghafur, Md. Abu Zahid, H. Sarkar, R. Barman, A. Al-Mahmud, Mahbubur Rahman, Hasanul Islam
{"title":"Effect of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor versus Valsartan on Cardiac Status in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Rangpur Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh","authors":"S. Ghafur, Md. Abu Zahid, H. Sarkar, R. Barman, A. Al-Mahmud, Mahbubur Rahman, Hasanul Islam","doi":"10.4236/ojim.2020.101003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction has a significant association with considerable morbidity and mortality, but there is still inadequacy in appropriate treatment to prevent this condition. We observed the effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) with such disorder compared to valsartan. Methods: In this single-blind trial, the patients were enrolled with chronic HF aged on or above 40 years, symptomatic NYHA class II - IV, an elevated NT-proBNP above 400 pg/ml level and a reduced LVEF of 40% or less. The patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the treatment arms either ARNi (50 mg titrated to 100 mg twice a day) or valsartan (40 mg titrated to 80 mg twice a day) and followed for a median of 88 days. The primary outcome was mode of cardiovascular death and re-hospitalization for heart failure. Changes in the level of NT-proBNP and rate of ejection fraction were also measured. Results: Cardiovascular deaths occurred 4 (8%) in the ARNi treatment arm, while 11 (22%) in the valsartan treatment arm with significant hazard ratio in the ARNi group [Hazard Ratio = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.64; p = 0.042] during a median of 88 days of follow up period and 2 (4%) of the patients from the ARNi treatment arm were hospitalized due to HF, while in the valsartan treatment arm, 10 (20%) patients were hospitalized due to HF followed by receiving treatment respectively with hazard ratio in the ARNi group [Hazard Ratio = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.92; p < 0.037]. Furthermore, a significant effect was found to have in LVEF and NT-proBNP at 95% level of significance (p < 0.05). These effects resulted from somewhat increased in LVEF (30.4% ± 6.7% to 38.8% ± 8.1%) and intensely decreased in NT-proBNP (3066.5 ± 1882.1 pg/ml to 808.2 ± 592.5 pg/ml) in the ARNi group, as compared to valsartan group in LVEF (30.6% ± 6.0% to 35% ± 7.9%) and in NT-proBNP (3488.2 ± 2912.2 pg/ml to 1886.4 ± 1017.8 pg/ml). Conclusion: Chronic treatment with the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) strongly decreases the NT-proBNP as well as morbidity and mortality and increases LVEF in patients with heart failure compared to valsartan.","PeriodicalId":60567,"journal":{"name":"内科学期刊(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"内科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojim.2020.101003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction has a significant association with considerable morbidity and mortality, but there is still inadequacy in appropriate treatment to prevent this condition. We observed the effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) with such disorder compared to valsartan. Methods: In this single-blind trial, the patients were enrolled with chronic HF aged on or above 40 years, symptomatic NYHA class II - IV, an elevated NT-proBNP above 400 pg/ml level and a reduced LVEF of 40% or less. The patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the treatment arms either ARNi (50 mg titrated to 100 mg twice a day) or valsartan (40 mg titrated to 80 mg twice a day) and followed for a median of 88 days. The primary outcome was mode of cardiovascular death and re-hospitalization for heart failure. Changes in the level of NT-proBNP and rate of ejection fraction were also measured. Results: Cardiovascular deaths occurred 4 (8%) in the ARNi treatment arm, while 11 (22%) in the valsartan treatment arm with significant hazard ratio in the ARNi group [Hazard Ratio = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.64; p = 0.042] during a median of 88 days of follow up period and 2 (4%) of the patients from the ARNi treatment arm were hospitalized due to HF, while in the valsartan treatment arm, 10 (20%) patients were hospitalized due to HF followed by receiving treatment respectively with hazard ratio in the ARNi group [Hazard Ratio = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.92; p < 0.037]. Furthermore, a significant effect was found to have in LVEF and NT-proBNP at 95% level of significance (p < 0.05). These effects resulted from somewhat increased in LVEF (30.4% ± 6.7% to 38.8% ± 8.1%) and intensely decreased in NT-proBNP (3066.5 ± 1882.1 pg/ml to 808.2 ± 592.5 pg/ml) in the ARNi group, as compared to valsartan group in LVEF (30.6% ± 6.0% to 35% ± 7.9%) and in NT-proBNP (3488.2 ± 2912.2 pg/ml to 1886.4 ± 1017.8 pg/ml). Conclusion: Chronic treatment with the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) strongly decreases the NT-proBNP as well as morbidity and mortality and increases LVEF in patients with heart failure compared to valsartan.
血管紧张素受体尼泊尔赖氨酸抑制剂与缬沙坦对射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭患者心脏状态的影响:孟加拉国朗布尔医学院医院的一项随机临床试验
背景:射血分数降低的心力衰竭与相当大的发病率和死亡率有着显著的相关性,但预防这种情况的适当治疗仍然不足。与缬沙坦相比,我们观察了血管紧张素受体奈普赖氨酸抑制剂(ARNi)对此类疾病的影响。方法:在这项单盲试验中,入选的患者年龄在40岁或以上,有症状的NYHA II-IV级,NT-proBNP水平升高超过400 pg/ml,LVEF降低40%或更低。患者被1:1随机分配到ARNi(50 mg,每天两次滴定至100 mg)或缬沙坦(40 mg,每天二次滴定至80 mg)治疗组,平均随访88天。主要结果是心血管死亡模式和心力衰竭再次住院治疗。还测量了NT-proBNP水平和射血分数的变化。结果:在平均88天的随访期内,ARNi治疗组发生心血管死亡4例(8%),缬沙坦治疗组发生11例(22%),ARNi组有显著的危险比[危险比=0.37;95%可信区间:0.34,0.64;p=0.042],ARNi治疗组有2例(4%)患者因HF住院,ARNi组有10名(20%)患者因HF住院,随后分别接受治疗,风险比为[风险比=0.80;95%CI:0.57,0.92;p<0.037]。此外,ARNi组LVEF(30.4%±6.7%至38.8%±8.1%)略有升高,NT-proBNP(3066.5±1882.1 pg/ml至808.2±592.5 pg/ml)显著降低,与缬沙坦组相比,LVEF(30.6%±6.0%至35%±7.9%)和NT-proBNP(3488.2±2912.2pg/ml至1886.4±1017.8pg/ml)。结论:与缬沙坦相比,血管紧张素受体奈普赖氨酸抑制剂(ARNi)的慢性治疗可显著降低心力衰竭患者的NT-proBNP、发病率和死亡率,并增加LVEF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书