“Will I be judged harshly after trying to help but causing more troubles?” A misprediction about help recipients

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xuesong Shang, Zhuo Chen, Jingyi Lu
{"title":"“Will I be judged harshly after trying to help but causing more troubles?” A misprediction about help recipients","authors":"Xuesong Shang, Zhuo Chen, Jingyi Lu","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"competence. Afterwards, helpers predicted help recipients’ reactions, whereas help recipients rated their own reactions. The results showed that helpers underestimated help recipients’ ratings of warmth and competence in the failure condition and that this underestimation accounted for the overestimation of help recipients’ negative reactions. In Study 5, we recorded participants’ real-time thoughts during their prediction or rating process. We found that helpers considered their competence (warmth) earlier and more (later and less) than help recipients, indicating that helpers focused more on their competence and less on their warmth when making predictions about help recipients than help recipients did. The query order and content accounted for the overestimation of help recipients’ negative reactions in the failure condition. We show that people who try to help others but eventually cause more troubles mispredict the reactions of help recipients. Helpers overestimate the negative consequences (underestimate the positive consequences) of their behaviors to help recipients. We also reveal the underlying mechanism of this misprediction that helps recipients pay more attention to helpers’ warmth and less attention to helpers’ competence compared to helpers’ predictions about help recipients. Understanding this misprediction helps alleviate the concerns of helpers when they are intended to offer help but actually do harm to others and helps promote subsequent helping behaviors.","PeriodicalId":36627,"journal":{"name":"心理学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"心理学报","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

competence. Afterwards, helpers predicted help recipients’ reactions, whereas help recipients rated their own reactions. The results showed that helpers underestimated help recipients’ ratings of warmth and competence in the failure condition and that this underestimation accounted for the overestimation of help recipients’ negative reactions. In Study 5, we recorded participants’ real-time thoughts during their prediction or rating process. We found that helpers considered their competence (warmth) earlier and more (later and less) than help recipients, indicating that helpers focused more on their competence and less on their warmth when making predictions about help recipients than help recipients did. The query order and content accounted for the overestimation of help recipients’ negative reactions in the failure condition. We show that people who try to help others but eventually cause more troubles mispredict the reactions of help recipients. Helpers overestimate the negative consequences (underestimate the positive consequences) of their behaviors to help recipients. We also reveal the underlying mechanism of this misprediction that helps recipients pay more attention to helpers’ warmth and less attention to helpers’ competence compared to helpers’ predictions about help recipients. Understanding this misprediction helps alleviate the concerns of helpers when they are intended to offer help but actually do harm to others and helps promote subsequent helping behaviors.
“在试图帮助但造成更多麻烦后,我会受到严厉的评判吗?”关于受援者的错误预测
能力之后,帮助者预测受援者的反应,而受援者则对自己的反应进行评分。结果表明,帮助者低估了受援者在失败情况下的热情和能力评级,这种低估是高估受援者负面反应的原因。在研究5中,我们记录了参与者在预测或评级过程中的实时想法。我们发现,与受援者相比,帮助者更早、更多(更晚、更少)地考虑自己的能力(温暖),这表明帮助者在预测受援者时比受援者更关注自己的能力,而更少关注自己的温暖。查询顺序和内容解释了在失败情况下过高估计帮助接受者的负面反应。我们发现,那些试图帮助他人但最终造成更多麻烦的人会错误预测受援者的反应。帮助者高估了他们帮助接受者的行为的负面后果(低估了积极后果)。我们还揭示了这种预测失误的潜在机制,与帮助者对帮助对象的预测相比,这种预测失误有助于帮助对象更多地关注帮助者的热情,而较少关注帮助对象的能力。理解这种错误的预测有助于减轻帮助者在意图提供帮助但实际伤害他人时的担忧,并有助于促进后续的帮助行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
心理学报
心理学报 Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1612
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信