COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVENTIONAL, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HYBRID BASED MPPT TECHNIQUE FOR 852.6-WATT PV SYSTEM

Q4 Social Sciences
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVENTIONAL, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HYBRID BASED MPPT TECHNIQUE FOR 852.6-WATT PV SYSTEM","authors":"","doi":"10.4018/ijsesd.302463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, Matlab & Simulation software is used for analysis and comparison of 8(Eight) different MPPT. Different MPPT techniques that have been considered in this article are PWM-based, Perturb and Observation (P&O), Incremental Conductance (InC), and Modified InC (MIC) that comes under the Conventional Method. In the Artificial Intelligence, Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is chosen and in Hybrid method Neuro-Fuzzy Network (NFN) and Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) has been considered. PV module of 852.2 Watt is designed with the Boost Converter which can boost the voltage up to 185 Volt for all MPPT. A set of data has been taken for FLC, ANN, NFN, and ANFIS. After implementation, the result has been analyzed for standard test conditions and for the different environmental conditions. In this article, both irradiation and the temperature have been varied together for all MPPT rest are kept constant.","PeriodicalId":38556,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsesd.302463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, Matlab & Simulation software is used for analysis and comparison of 8(Eight) different MPPT. Different MPPT techniques that have been considered in this article are PWM-based, Perturb and Observation (P&O), Incremental Conductance (InC), and Modified InC (MIC) that comes under the Conventional Method. In the Artificial Intelligence, Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is chosen and in Hybrid method Neuro-Fuzzy Network (NFN) and Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) has been considered. PV module of 852.2 Watt is designed with the Boost Converter which can boost the voltage up to 185 Volt for all MPPT. A set of data has been taken for FLC, ANN, NFN, and ANFIS. After implementation, the result has been analyzed for standard test conditions and for the different environmental conditions. In this article, both irradiation and the temperature have been varied together for all MPPT rest are kept constant.
852.6瓦光伏系统常规、人工智能和混合MPPT技术的对比分析
本文利用Matlab和仿真软件对8种不同的MPPT进行了分析和比较。本文中考虑的不同MPPT技术是基于PWM的、扰动和观测(P&O)、增量电导(InC)和常规方法下的修正InC(MIC)。在人工智能中,选择了模糊逻辑控制器(FLC)、人工神经网络(ANN),并在混合方法中考虑了神经模糊网络(NFN)和自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)。852.2瓦的光伏模块设计有升压转换器,可以将所有MPPT的电压提高到185伏。已经为FLC、ANN、NFN和ANFIS获取了一组数据。实施后,对标准试验条件和不同环境条件下的结果进行了分析。在这篇文章中,辐照和温度都是一起变化的,所有MPPT休息都保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信